PERIMETER DEFENSES FOR NASA SCIENCE FRAUD JOHN MATHER

[Click to enlarge]
John Mather Nobel Laureate NASA GSFC science fraud, Smithsonian Associates Future is Here Conference, National Geographic Big Idea, TIME Magazine Most Influential Man in Space, US Congress, James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scientific misconduct, decline and fall of the American civilization

John Mather Nobel Laureate NASA GSFC science fraud, Smithsonian Associates Future is Here Conference, National Geographic Big Idea, TIME Magazine Most Influential Man in Space, US Congress, James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scientific misconduct, decline and fall of the American civilization

REFERENCES:

How powerful Democratic members of the US Congress have repeatedly expressed solidarity with science fraud John Mather

How the James Webb Space Telescope crew have used the platform to promote the individual Mather

How National Geographic feted John Mather (VIDEO)

How TIME Magazine feted John Mather

How the Smithsonian Institution fetes Mather

John C. Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud/scientific misconduct

John C. Mather (left) NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud was never publicly acknowledged in six years since it was exposed. There is no public mention that there was anything the matter with his discovery. His fraud is being handled by various parties concerned by slinking away from his “discovery”. Even as this surreptitious back-pedaling is happening, he is being enabled by people in very high places to whoop it up as a high profile celebrity and a NASA icon, and to inspire young people with his own example.
And now about the luckless ones whose backs no one has.
The frauds of Dr. Anil Potti, Dr. Diapk Das and Dr. Bharat Aggarwal (right, top to bottom) – all Indian-Americans, in unconnected research programs – have all been subjected very promptly and with great urgency to zealous investigation and media reporting, as they should be.
Their careers have pretty much ended.

IN CONCLUSION:

The true intent of the US policy on science fraud/scientific misconduct/scientific integrity clarified

QUO VADIS AMERICAN PHYSICIST?

Summer is nearly upon us. Soon it will be announced that two young people have been branded with the John Mather iron: AIP Mather Policy Interns. In July, several more young people will become branded: John Mather Nobel Scholars.

It is time to take a good look at those who stick the branding iron in glowing ember, those who pin down the cattle, and those who position the red hot iron and …

[Click to enlarge]
John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud, Big Bang Cosmology, Louis J. Lanzerotti, H. Frederick Dylla, C. Megan Urry, Lawrence Krauss, Richard Conn Henry, AIP Mather Policy Intern, John Mather Nobel Scholar

John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud, Big Bang Cosmology, Louis J. Lanzerotti, H. Frederick Dylla, C. Megan Urry, Lawrence Krauss, Richard Conn Henry, AIP Mather Policy Intern, John Mather Nobel Scholar

[Click to enlarge]
Science fraud physics scientific misconduct, Big Bang Cosmology Theory CMB Relic Radiation Blackbody Spectrum, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate, University of California Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Victor Ninov, Jan Hendrik Schon

Science fraud physics scientific misconduct, Big Bang Cosmology Theory CMB Relic Radiation Blackbody Spectrum, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate, University of California Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Victor Ninov, Jan Hendrik Schon

[Click to enlarge]
Nobel Prize for Physics Big Bang Cosmology,
Penzias & Wilson; Smoot & Mather: Perlmutter, Schmidt and Riess

Nobel Prize for Physics Big Bang Cosmology,
Penzias & Wilson; Smoot & Mather: Perlmutter, Schmidt and Riess

Lord have mercy on the young of America!

TWO WHO TOOK DOWN BIG BANG COSMOLOGY

[Click to enlarge]
Big Bang Cosmology Takedown
A tribute to Hannes Alfvén

Big Bang Cosmology Takedown
A tribute to Hannes Alfvén

[Click to enlarge]
Hannes Alfvén, a founding father of Electromagnetic Theory and Space Physics, has long warned us about Big Bang Cosmology.

Hannes Alfvén, a founding father of Electromagnetic Theory and Space Physics, has long warned us about Big Bang Cosmology.
Maddox is John Maddox, former editor of the journal Nature.
To read the full report, click here.

JOHN MATHER NOBEL SCHOLAR INTERVIEWS FOR A JOB

This job interview takes place sometime in future. A John Mather Nobel Scholar “Jim” has finished his Ph. D. and has applied for a most coveted job. In due course he is called to an interview.

*****

INTERVIEWER: Jim, great to meet you. Please have a seat. Can I get you a cup of coffee?

JIM: Great to meet you too. No coffee for me, thanks, I’m good.

INTERVIEWER: OK, so I have been going through your resume with interest. You truly have had a most accomplished student career – finest universities, straight A’s, scholarships all the way, awards, summer internships at impressive places. The letters of recommendation we have received on you are all superlative. You’re just the kind of person this organization is looking for.

JIM: Thank you. I am most interested in becoming a part of this organization.

INTERVIEWER: That’s good to hear. Now, there’s just one thing in your otherwise fabulous record that puzzled me a bit. I looked you up on the Internet and read about this John Mather Nobel Scholar thing you had won, although this is not included in your resume. Is this the same John Mather who has been exposed as the greatest science fraud in history?

JIM: Well .. er…

INTERVIEWER: Don’t be uncomfortable. I’m just trying to understand something about your thought process and decision-making process. At the time that you made a decision to apply for this, was there any indication that Mather is a science fraud?

JIM: Well .. er … not officially, no.

INTERVIEWER: So there was some indication unofficially?

JIM: It was just some crackpot agitating on the Internet. Otherwise Dr. Mather was held in the highest regard by the scientific establishment. He was constantly in the limelight – more so than any other Nobel physicists. He was seen with the most powerful leaders of the United States Congress. He was on such distinguished forums as the National Geographic, Smithsonian Institution and TIME Magazine. A professor who knows Dr. Mather called me into his office and strongly urged me to apply for this. My NASA Goddard internship supervisor who is a colleague of Dr. Mather wrote me a strong recommendation. And after I received the award, the Goddard Center Director Chris Scolese met with me personally and congratulated me.

INTERVIEWER: I see. What did the award consist of?

JIM: It’s the right to call yourself a John Mather Nobel Scholar, a photo-op with Dr. Mather, and a scientific travel grant of $3000.

INTERVIEWER: That’s not a lot of money. It’s not like something you could not find from other sources if you had a scientific meeting to go to. So your real motivation was not this money, right?

JIM: If you put it that way, yes.

INTERVIEWER: So the fact that you end up with the name of the greatest science fraud in history attached to you stems from your decision to glom on to a famous name at a time that name was placed in question?

JIM: Placed in question by a crackpot, I remind you.

INTERVIEWER: You might have a point there. You were a young student and you went with the scientific establishment view. No one would fault you for that. I certainly would not hold this against you.

JIM: (Appearing visibly relieved) Thank you. I am glad that’s all cleared up.

INTERVIEWER: Well, actually it is not. What concerns me is that you have omitted from your resume factual information that I should have had right in front of me. You could have then explained it. Instead you have hidden this from your resume. That’s the type of thought process and decision-making process I was talking about. The fraud itself is not at issue here. So thank you for coming in. Our HR Deaprtment will be in touch with you about what we decide.

JIM: (Hesitatingly) Just one question. If I had included this in my resume, how would you have reacted to that?

INTERVIEWER: That would depend on how explained it. Actually, in my browsing the Internet I found that there was much more to the allegation of science fraud than just a crackpot agitating at the time you applied for this program. How would you have explained that?

*****

The same scenario also applies to the AIP Mather Policy Intern Program.

THE GREAT PHYSICS FRAUD TRIO

[Click to enlarge]
Science fraud physics scientific misconduct, Big Bang Cosmology Theory CMB Relic Radiation Blackbody Spectrum, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate, University of California Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Victor Ninov, Jan Hendrik Schon

Science fraud physics scientific misconduct, Big Bang Cosmology Theory CMB Relic Radiation Blackbody Spectrum, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate, University of California Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Victor Ninov, Jan Hendrik Schon

BIG BANG RELIC RADIATION: Then & Now

BIG BANG TRENDING – BUT WHICH WAY?

[Click to enlarge]
Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation

Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation

THE BIG BANG THEORY BLACKBODY SPECTRUM:

The success of Big Bang Cosmology rests 100.00% on the discovery of the Cosmic Blackbody Spectrum. This is what the Big Bang Cosmologists themselves have strongly averred. It was with the Blackbody that they shut out all alternative cosmologies and all the critics, and beat up some of them badly.

But there is an attempt today to cite a laundry list of other things that support Big Bang. The idea is to continue Big Bang Cosmology without the Blackbody, now that that scam has been laid bare. Do not fall for this deception. Do not let Big Bang Cosmologists outrun their scam! Do not let these hombres weasel out of this one!

The strangest thing! After plastering the world with the glory of the Big Bang Blackbody all these years, after installing it in museums and in monuments and in children’s textbooks, after garnering all these prizes and accolades and limelight, after conducting such brisk commerce with glossy books and dvds, suddenly everyone has clammed up on it.

The scientific establishment does not ask any questions about this. The scientific media does not ask any questions about this. Why?

Are there parallels between Big Bang Blackbody and Iraqi WMD?

When a science fraud is very fully exposed, what do they do? They simply deep-six the fraudulent discovery. A NATO style secrecy is imposed around it.

Not only that. In concert with the cover up plan, they are relaunching their great hero, science fraud John Mather this summer through a platform as high as the Smithsonian Institutions!

The greatest science fraud in history has been saved by the greatest cover up plan in history – engaged in by a coalition of willing nations.

[Click to enlarge]
Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation
Cover Up of science fraud, scientific misconduct NASA Satellite fraud
Physics Nobel Prize for Physics 1978, 2006, 2011

Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation
Cover Up of science fraud, scientific misconduct NASA Satellite fraud
Physics Nobel Prize for Physics 1978, 2006, 2011

Because there has been no official retraction of the Blackbody from any quarters, all the peripheral pundits today are going like energizer bunnies, telling the world in most authoritative language that Big Bang Cosmology has been proved beyond the shadow of a doubt. The truth is that it is the worst kind of chicanery that has ever been perpetrated under the guise of science.

THE GREATEST MUSEUM SCAMS: Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum

[Click to enlarge]
Smithsonian Conference Future is Here.
The John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate COBE Satellite scam exhibits at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum

Smithsonian Conference Future is Here.
The John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate COBE Satellite scam exhibits at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum

SHOCK-JOCK HAWKING IS DOING MORE THAN SHOCK-JOCKING!

MODEL 2013

Every year or so Stephen Hawking goes on a tour and issues a shock-jock quotation and follows it by a little self-deprecating humor. This year he has come to Caltech.

At his home institution Cambridge University Hawking is surrounded by a whole bunch of scientists, an entourage that has now been formalized as the Stephen Hawking Center for Theoretical Cosmology.

I don’t know if these scientists sit around an oval conference table and drink tea from Royal Doulton China with hand-painted periwinkles and brainstorm and develop what joke and what humor Hawking should spin each year, or if these are pure Hawking. Hard to say.

At any rate, from reading various news reports, here is what I understand to be the 2013 Model Shock-Jock Revelation:

M-Theory will save mankind from assured annihilation.

How does that work? It seems that M-Theory will help define the Inflation Era geometry of the Cosmic Egg and show us the seeds of the beneficial places there that will be evident in the picture of the Baby Universe. Then the “current” locations of these places in the universe will be identified. Then mankind will go to those places and set up household.

The Earth will self-destruct in another 1000 years, give or take. So that’s how much time we have to work this out.

The 2013 Model Self-Deprecating Humor is this:

His Holiness the then Pope had once subjected Hawking to an (Torquemada-style?) Inquisition, and Hawking feels proud about it.

Oh – kay then.

Now someone asked him a question. Advances in science and technology have made it possible for a human to control a machine with only his thoughts. What kind of machine would Hawking like to control?

The answer: He would like to control a human being.

If you put that together with another statement he made on the occasion of his 70th birthday, it would seem that he would like to control a human being of the female pursuation.

ENOUGH HUMOR!

Enough humor! There is something very dark going on here folks.This is the beginning of the retrenchment of Big Bang Theory. They are doing a number on you.

Big Bang is dead – and they know it. They can keep it alive like Norman Bates’ mother only so long.

Having subjected the world most aggressively to this garbage science for a hundred years, and having roughed up the critics badly, they cannot now admit that Big Bang is dead. They are riding a fast and ferocious and a very hungry tiger they cannot dismount.

Hence this surreptitious plan to make Big Bang go away without anyone ever realizing that any fault was ever admitted.

LE PLAN DIABOLIQUE

Here’s how it will play out. The huge umbrella of M-Theory has been brought over Big Bang. Hawking introduces the idea kind of casual-like, but this is a part of a well-orchestrated stratagem. Under the cover of this already unfurled umbrella, the hombres will do their hanky-panky.

Big Bang will be taken from the Cosmology Directorate and transferred to the Superstring Directorate. There it will be refurbished in Hangar 18. It will then be given a new name and a new coat of paint. (The superstringers are nothing if not masters at coming up with jargons.) Then the new model will be rolled out.

This entire process will then be described as normal, healthy course of evolution of scientific ideas.

WHO WILL PUNISH THE HOMBRES MALOS?

Who will the GAO hold accountable for the tens of billions of dollars and euros of taxpayer money? Who can be sued class-action for the hundreds of millions of dollars and euros of brisk commerce in glossy books and dvds, products that should have been recalled years ago? Who will answer for the scamming with data from three satellites? How will the seven bogus Nobel Prizes be addressed? What about the historically tainted roster of so many prizes and accolades and commencement speeches? How will the historical monuments and permanent museum exhibits be explained to visiting children? How will children’s textbooks be rectified? How will they be told to disregard people who they have worshipped so lovingly as great heroes? Who will pay for the shrinks the children might then need to cope with this trauma?

A PROVERB

There is a Bengali proverb: Whatever blame there is to assign, just dump it all on Nanda Ghosh. (Joto dosh Nanda Ghosh.)

Who will be Big Bang’s Nanda Ghosh?

[Click to enlarge]
Stephen Hawking Big Bang Theory Cosmology landscape
COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, Planck Satellites

Stephen Hawking Big Bang Theory Cosmology landscape
COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, Planck Satellites

BIG BANG THEORY FRAUD: Where do we stand?

[Click to enlarge]
Big Bang Theory, ESA Planck Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate fraud, Big Bang Cosmology, White House, US Congress, Nobel Foundation

Big Bang Theory, ESA Planck Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate fraud, Big Bang Cosmology, White House, US Congress, Nobel Foundation

[Click to enlarge]
Big Bang Theory fraud, Dreamheron has coffee with a Friend

Big Bang Theory fraud, Dreamheron has coffee with a Friend

NASA SCIENCE FRAUD JOHN MATHER A “DEEP POCKET OF KNOWLEDGE”: Smithsonian

Smithsonian Conference: Future is Here
with John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud

Smithsonian Conference: Future is Here
with John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud

The clever stratagems to transform the greatest science fraud in history into the noblest American are picking up steam yet once again!

Smithsonian Air and Space Museum – a part of the Smithsonian Institutions – has long undertaken a systematic program to glorify and immortalize NASA science fraud John Mather and his fraudulent discovery and the paraphernalia thereto pertaining.

These activities have happened even as the allegation of fraud was a public matter, and even as NASA Leadership capped Mather’s job at the pre-Nobel Prize level, and even as the PBS documentary Hunting the Edge of Space surgically expunged John Mather and George Smoot from the history of cosmological discoveries.

The Museum has immortalized Mather’s discovery by installing as a permanent exhibit a replica of the COBE Satellite.

Then they entered into their permanent exhibit a replica of Mather’s Nobel Prize Medal. Then they collaborated in a program to fly this medal on a Space Shuttle and then reinstall it.

Read about these here.

Now, just this month, the Smithsonian Magazine declared that Mather is a “deep pocket of knowledge,” and represents that “Future is here.”

The Smithsonian will fete him as such this summer.

Very strangely, the US DOE has just launched in March 2013 an effort to plug the John Mather Nobel Prize, some six years after the Prize. The timing is uncanny. Why trot out this warmed-over news now? It is as though some behind-the-scence forces are promoting Mather with a concerted plan at this critical juncture. Smithsonian and DOE are two fronts – there may emerge others.

And here is another thing. While Smoot and Perlmutter actually worked in a DOE-funded Lab while they made their discoveries, Mather had no connection whatsoever to DOE. There is no basis to say that Mather COBE Satellite discovery was a DOE Accomplishment. But it was dug up that when Mather was a Ph. D. student at Berkeley (long before his COBE work), he received some little support under some odd program that was connected somehow to DOE. So you can see how this whole thing was “engineered” recently for the specific purpose of the John Mather Revival Campaign!

Whether the architects of this Revival Campaign are using the platforms like Smithsonian and DOE, or whether these platforms are themselves corrupted, I cannot say.

[Click to enlarge]
US Department of Energy accomplishments 2013:
John Mather, Saul Perlmutter, George Smoot

US Department of Energy accomplishments 2013:
John Mather, Saul Perlmutter, George Smoot.
John Mather had no connection whatsoever to DOE the whole time he worked on the COBE Satellite, leading to his Nobel Prize.
The above graphic on him was “engineered” based on a far-fetched connection, to help him beat the science fraud charge in the public eye.

This appears indeed to be the Summer of Mather. Other activities include placing two Mather Policy Interns inside the US Congress, and the usual associated publicity for Mather.

And of course the John Mather Nobel Scholar program still operates in full glory.

There is out some more information on the John Mather Nobel Scholar Murderer in this photo. On top of reportedly being mentally unwell, he was also reportedly drunk when he shot and killed an innocent young man, and wounded another.

Certainly this has nothing to do with the Mather Scholarship, and certainly no one is comfortable reading about this . But it is news, and Mather’s friends like to constantly keep him afloat in all kinds of news. So let’s not pick and choose. Remember how it became big news worldwide about a “Nobel Laureate pedophile” even though this had nothing to do with the Nobel Prize? John Mather Nobel Scholar Murderer in this photo provided by NASA to the media within the present context comes under the same category.

In the above photo of the 2010 Scholars, bright young people at the threshold of their careers, happen to be there today in company of one murderer and one science fraud.

If somebody puts me in a situation where something untoward happens to me that would not normally happen to me, it is not that somebody’s fault. But, unreasonably perhaps, I would think twice before agreeing to be placed in any situation again by that somebody. That’s just me.

[Click to enlarge]
Why is John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate so relevant to the Smithsonian Museum?

Why is John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate so relevant to the Smithsonian Museum?
Get it?