COSMIC BLACKBODY ALIVE AND WELL IN MAINSTREAM PHYSICS ESTABLISHMENT

August 21, 2014

Just this summer, Professor Amber Miller of Columbia University (appearing at the World Science Festival panel discussion on BICEP2), stated emphatically (and it seems, not required by the context of the discussion) that the cosmic blackbody is intact. Her taxpayer-funded high-tech research in the high frontier is riding on this assumption.

A video released last month by the learned society SPIE and filmed at NASA Goddard pointedly avers that the blackbody is fully intact, with 50 ppm accuracy.

And today this bit of public education from Professor Peter Coles of the University of Sussex (upon holding many consultations with mainstream colleagues at a conference on this very subject in Denmark) states:

The problem – the Achilles Heel of BICEP, so to speak – is that it operates at a single frequency, 150 GHz. That means that it is not possible for this experiment on its own to determine the spectrum of the detected signal. This is important because it is not only the cosmic microwave background that is capable of producing polarized radiation at a frequency of 150 GHz, foreground dust inside our own Galaxy being the prime suspect. It should be possible to distinguish between dust and CMB using measurements at different frequencies because the microwave background has a black-body spectrum whereas dust does not.

This shows how far and how long this scientific establishment will consciously ride on an utter falsehood (and deceive the public and the taxpayers), under the convenient pretext that the fraud has not been publicly acknowledged by this scientific establishment. See the circular logic?!

Lord have mercy!

10 SKELETONS IN THE BIG BANG CLOSET

August 15, 2014


Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Theory, Kavli Prize 2014, Cosmological Inflation Theory, Bicep2 discovery, Bicep2 South Pole, Bicep2 galactic dust, Cosmological redshift, Hubble redshift, expanding universe, Alan Guth MIT Kavli Prize, Andrei Linde Stanford Kavli Prize, John Kovac Harvard Bicep2, Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford Bicep2, Jamie BocK JPL Bicep2, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, Planck Satellite, Big Bang Blackbody Spectrum, CMB Spectrum, Cosmic Background Radiation CMB, Kavli Foundation, Keck Foundation, NSF

Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Theory, Kavli Prize 2014, Cosmological Inflation Theory, Bicep2 discovery, Bicep2 South Pole, Bicep2 galactic dust, Cosmological redshift, Hubble redshift, expanding universe, Alan Guth MIT Kavli Prize, Andrei Linde Stanford Kavli Prize, John Kovac Harvard Bicep2, Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford Bicep2, Jamie BocK JPL Bicep2, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, Planck Satellite, Big Bang Blackbody Spectrum, CMB Spectrum, Cosmic Background Radiation CMB, Kavli Foundation, Keck Foundation, NSF

WHO CAN STOP BIG BANG INFLATION THEORY ANYMORE?

August 11, 2014

THE NEW PARADIGM ON HOW GREAT SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERERS ARE IDENTIFIED, GROOMED, ANOINTED AND ENSHRINED:

There was that viral YouTube video.

There was the showy Press Conference.

There was the endorsement with linguistic flair from the Harvard President.

Then there was the star-studded endorsement from TIME Magazine.

There was the solemn endorsement on the floor of the United States Congress from Rep. Bill Foster.

Then there was the rich endorsement from the Kavli Foundation.

There was that elegant glass case in blond wood built to order to house the anticipated Inflation Theory Nobel citation.

And now this:

Inflation Theorists Andrei Linde and Alan Guth receiving congratulations from President Obama on their winning the Kavli Prize 2014.

Inflation Theorists Andrei Linde and Alan Guth receiving congratulations from President Obama on their winning the Kavli Prize 2014.

See full article.

What does all this have to do with the scientific process, you ask me, kids?
Beats me!
Should you go into physics?
Best not.

THE SCIENTIFIC TRUTH: SCAMMING AND SCHEMING

THE 2014 KAVLI PRIZE FOR ASTROPHYSICS IS DELIBERATELY BASED ON PATENT SCIENTIFIC LIES

“As the universe expanded it cooled. Today it is bathed in a sea of microwave radiation, the heat left over from the Big Bang.”
-from 2014 Kavli Prize citation.

There is not an iota of observational evidence of any heat left over from any Big Bang. The discovery of the predicted Big Bang relic Blackbody radiation was an outright fraud. It does not exist in any shape or form or approximation. Period. The observed non-existence of the Blackbody fatally disproved Big Bang Theory and Inflation Theory. Starting in 1990!

The observed Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB) has not been established to be the Big Bang Relic Radiation. While its true spectrum is known, it is being kept under wraps so that scam events such as the 2014 Kavli Prize could proceed.

The very first step in trying to establish that CMB is the relic radiation would have been to disown the Blackbody: explain why the predicted Blackbody is not there in the sky. The second step would have been to release that true spectrum, and explain why this spectrum is now the revised prediction for Big Bang relic radiation.

None of that has been done. As soon as you open that door, the jig would be up for the Bigbangistas and the inflationistas.

Do I mean that the true spectrum can be determined from WMAP and Planck Satellite measurements? No!

I mean that the spectrum has been determined and embargoed.

How do I know this?

Simple deduction anyone can make. When WMAP and Planck have calculated such things as polarization vectors referred to the sky, they had to go through the intermediate step of calculating the absolute intensities referred to the sky. That’s the spectrum right there!

Can I be more specific? Sure.

Five data points of this spectrum are on this side of the Atlantic, in the files of Charles Bennett of Johns Hopkins University; and nine data points are on the other side of the Atlantic, in the files of Jan Tauber of ESA.

Altogether there are fourteen data points in the frequency range of the 2.7 K blackbody spectrum.

For those who think I exaggerate when I say that the scientific civilization is in decline, just consider this: As all of the above is going on, the scientific establishment remains totally complicit with their total silence. And for how many decades has this been going on now?

Lord have mercy!

COSMIC BLACKBODY AND B-MODE ARE ONE AND THE SAME THING

July 30, 2014

The reader may have noticed that there is a great deal of effort today by the Big Bang establishment to establish that inflation and Big Bang – while linking smoothly – are two different things. The purpose of this deception is to save Big Bang in case inflation falls apart.

Now consider:

The 2.7 K Blackbody Spectrum: It arises in theory because – as Big Bang space stretches – the same amount of radiative energy occupies larger and larger volume. Therefore an initial high temperature blackbody shifts to lower and lower temperatures. Big Bang Cosmologists have taught us emphatically that the wavelength of radiation stretches with space, and this is how this cooling happens. In other words, the entire crux of Big Bang is that electromagnetic fields are glued to the space.

[Note that they can not very well say that light from distant stars are glued to the space, but the Blackbody is not!]

B-Mode polarization: When the inflationary gravitation waves perturb this (same) space, they perturb the glued-on electromagnetic fields in a special way, and this is how the special B-Modes are produced in the Blackbody medium.

So when we speak of the 2.7 K Blackbody and B-Mode polarization, we are speaking of one and the same thing. Blackbody is the medium and B-Mode is the shape of the medium.

If it were a 5 K Blackbody instead, the quantitative theoretical predictions for the B-Mode would be different. If there is no blackbody radiation medium, there is no B-Mode polarization of the medium.

Before the advent of Dreamheron, the 2.7 K Blackbody radiation and CMB (Cosmic Microwave Blackground Radiation) were one and the same thing – like Fred and Freddie.

After the advent of Dreamheron, they have separated the Blackbody language and the CMB language. Having done so, they no longer speak the Blackbodyspeak, but they speak only the CMBspeak. The Blackbody is now “… the thing of which we do not speak….” (…ooh…ooh ….ooh….).

Now, what if they come out and say: We can give up the Blackbody, and treat in our theory the non-blackbody CMB as the original relic radiation medium upon which the B-Mode is imprinted? But this they have not done. To do so they first have to prove that the non-Blackbody CMB is the relic radiation.

The isotropy of CMB is not proof that it is relic radiation. The patchy nature of CMB is not a proof that it relic radiation. All the spectra they generated about the patchiness are not proof that CMB is relic radiation.

Remember how, after the discovery of the picture-perfect 2.7 K Blackbody, the Big Bang Cosmologists averred all over the place that this was the real clincher, because everything else was unconvincing.

Don’t forget that recently, inflation theorist Alexei Starobinsky spelled out explicitly that inflation theory rests on the 2.7 K Relic Blackbody radiation theory.

Don’t forget that the BICEP2 (and other similar telescopes) were specifically designed to look for B-Modes imprinted on the 2.7 K Blackbody.

So they are now covering up the most obvious fatal flaw in their ideas with linguistic trickery. The scientific process has been replaced by jiggery pokery. The scientific establishment knows this, and is going along with this most deliberately. They already got their colleagues the Kavli Prize for this grand deception. And there is talk of the Nobel Prize.

B-Mode polarization is bogus because the 2.7 K Blackbody is bogus. If there is no medium, then there is no imprint.

After the Blackbody stood disproved seven years ago, there was never any scientific reason for anyone to try to observe the B-Mode polarization.

Theoretically, there is no scientifically valid prediction of B-Mode polarization. Experimentally, BICEP2 most definitely did not observe any B-Mode polarization.

When I took down that Blackbody, I took down everything.

So why do the new heads of Hydra keep sprouting?

Lord have mercy!

cosmic microwave background radiation, cmb spectrum, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, Big Bang Theory, Inflation theory, andrei linde stanford, alan guth mit, alexei starobinsky, bicep2 discovery, kavli prize 2014

cosmic microwave background radiation, cmb spectrum, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, Big Bang Theory, Inflation theory, andrei linde stanford, alan guth mit, alexei starobinsky, bicep2 discovery, kavli prize 2014

BICEP2 MEASUREMENTS REAFFIRMED

July 28, 2014

There is an interview with Bicep2 team leader John Kovac of Harvard University published today. In it Kovac reaffirms his discovery, subject to the resolution of the foreground/background issue:

“Our BICEP2 telescope clearly detected a B-mode pattern of polarisation on the sky, matching what would be expected from inflationary gravitational waves.”

The following language confirms that the Planck scientists accept that the Bicep2 sky measurements are valid (on equal footing with the Planck measurements), but that the discovery is subject to resolution of the foreground/background issue (the dust issue):

“Fortunately we have now agreed to directly collaborate with the Planck team on a joint analysis which will combine our ultra-deep BICEP2 maps with their Planck maps at a wide range of frequencies to assess galactic emission, and we hope this will produce results that will reduce the uncertainties very soon.”

[The reader should remain mindful that the above analysis will require the observed CMB spectrum. The currently accepted blackbody spectrum is fraudulent, and the actual spectrum - though known - has never been released. So clearly some BICEP2-Planck collaborative hanky-panky is going on here, and will be going on when they deal with the new data. The taxpaying public is being royally screwed because nobody is ever telling them the truth. Neither BICEP2 nor Planck is deserving of public trust in this proposed collaboration. The fact of the matter is that this "collaboration" is meaningless and deceptive: It is like pooling together of investors' funds between Warren Buffett and Bernie Madoff in an attempt to rescue the latter.]

Kovac’s concluding sentence makes the BICEP2 discovery entirely contingent on the Planck sky measurements, thus subliminally removing from the public mind any other BICEP2 issues:

“Nothing beats new data to settle a debate, and that’s the great thing about science.”

[Indeed! When Planck had new data disproving the COBE Satellite discovery, they kept mum about it and let the fraudulent discovery stand. Planck thus has a demonstrated "political" propensity for covering the American butt, whatever the science is. It may be these things are being dictated from a much higher level.]

In another accompanying report, Australian scientific experts are also affirming that that the Bicep2 sky measurements are valid, but that the discovery is subject to the resolution of the foreground/background issue.

Australia is one of the leading countries in radio astronomy, and so this position is weighty.

On 24 July 2014, Mario Livio, a scientist at the Space Telescope Science Institute tweeted thus:

“Mario Livio ‏@Mario_Livio Jul 24

@JoelAchenbach My pleasure.I still have some hopes that the #BICEP2 result will turn out to be real (after corrections for dust are made).”

So an internationally concerted position is being promulgated that there are no other issues with the Bicep2 measurements.

My position remains the same.

For me, what is going on is all too familiar: déjà vu all over again. But I must admit that I had hoped that the matter would be handled differently this time around.

bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock jpl, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, Planck Satellite

bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock jpl, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, Planck Satellite

COMPARE THE ABOVE GRAPHIc WITH THE FOLLOWING:

BIG BANG STORIES: The education of Assumpta Innocent

July 22, 2014

Bicep2 discovery, Big Bang Cosmology

Bicep2 discovery, Big Bang Cosmology

BICEP2: Alexei Alexandrovich speaks

July 14, 2014

One of the 2014 Kavli Laureates, Alexei Starobinsky, has just given an interview. This is in Russian. So I used Google Translate, and then tried to polish up the machine translation a little bit. But there may still be translational glitches.

There are important points to note here:

(1). The Kavli Prize for inflation was indeed the direct result of the Bicep2 verification. (This verification is totally bogus.)

(2). The predictions of inflation theories pertain to the cosmic blackbody radiation, and the gravitational wave imprint is predicted to be in that blackbody radiation. (The existence of this blackbody has been repeatedly and emphatically disproved by COBE, WMAP and Planck Satellites. Enormous amounts of public moneys continue to be invested in ideas whose foundation has already been solidly disproved by the very same community with enormous amounts of public moneys.)

(3). Therefore, 2014 Kavli Prize for Cosmology should be seen as an enormous embarrassment. It marks a new low in the ongoing “Decadence and Declivity in the Contemporary Physics Establishment.” Physics as we knew it has been demolished and a totally false edifice is being erected in its place – complete with its heroes, geniuses, wunderkinds … Pretend physicists are making pretend discoveries and are garnering real life prizes.

Once you get past the humor, try and think how frightening it is what is going on. If you are an establishment physicist, your house is on fire. Right now!

EXCERPTS FROM THE INTERVIEW

Alexei Alexandrovich, first let me congratulate your on being awarded the prestigious Kavli Prize along with Andrei Linde. Was it a surprise to you?

Thank you. For me it was a great surprise that the Kavli Foundation decided to give the award for this because the past awards were more of observational nature. If Gruber Prize (which Starobinsky received in 2013) was for cosmology, the Kavli Prize so far, except for Astrophysicist Lynden-Bell, has been given for observation.

And I think the award is in order, so to speak; I am no longer being bypassed for appreciation of my pioneering work of 1979-1980.

When it came not to the words but to the observational data, then they remembered my work.

What kind of data?

First data – the COBE Satellite experiment of 1992. Then there were the results of observations of WMAP and Planck, which best relates to my work in 1980, and a recent result of BICEP 2, which best relates to my work in 1979.

In those years there were created several models of the expanding universe; what are their differences?

The main difference is: Should we go on the geometry or on physics? My 1980 model was in the spirit of Einstein, who had a general idea of geometricization of physics, and my model really was purely geometrical, since it all depended only on the curvature of spacetime. Another approach inherent in the work of Guth and Linde starts from elementary particle physics. So from the beginning they have postulated a scalar field.

Then in a funny way it turned out that the difference between these two approaches is not that big, and people began to talk about a certain duality. When two theories that formally look like completely different, but mathematical transformation one into another, their observational predictions can be the same. So now it turns out that there is not such a profound difference between the two approaches. In the last year a lot of Andrei Linde’s work is committed to both of his approach and supergravity which appears my original model.

Therefore, our two models rather complement each other.

What is the infamous unreliability of the experimental results BICEP2?

Our two models differ in the prediction of gravitational waves. In my model parameter r was 0.5%. In the model Linde – 15%, the ratio of the square of the amplitude of gravitational waves to the square of the amplitude of density perturbations. General prediction was that the gravitational wave has less than the scalar value, that is, must be less than unity. By how much it should be lessis dependent on the particular model assumed.

BICEP2 measurements, at first glance, speak more in favor of a model of Andrei. The only experiment that achieves accuracy in measuring the polarization of the CMB 10**-7 is BICEP2, but the price of such sensitivity is that that they measure the only one wavelength. And we are interested in not just any temperature of electromagnetic radiation, but only the black body temperature. Everything extraneous, produced by secondary sources, which are not too far away – the dust in our galaxy, or synchrotron radiation from active nuclei of nearby galaxies (complicate the situation). Therefore, strictly speaking, we cannot assert that Bicep2 measured the blackbody component. The survey data recently published by the Planck team are not in the galactic pole, where BICEP2 looked, because it is believed there is less dust in that direction, in high galactic latitudes.

The Planck conclusion was pessimistic: if their observations take the most “cold” area, the dust emission is sufficient to explain the results BICEP2 as not primarily due to gravitational waves, but mostly due to dust.

Just dust itself radiates: its temperature is about 20 degrees Kelvin.

So we should not blindly accept the results BICEP2, and check them. But check them not referring to other parts of the sky, but at the same location (as Bicep2), and also make measurements at other wavelengths. In principle, there are Planck results covering the entire sky, and the puzzle is why they keep it a secret. They have promised to publish these results in late October.

What should happen to bring this matter to a conclusion?

I think that the experimental data from Planck will be enough.

If this is not enough, you will need to do a new experiment.

We will need to look at other frequencies and measure the intensities that give the r value itself at three different frequencies.

DID BICEP2 TELESCOPE DISCOVER THE INTELLIGENT DESIGNER?

July 1, 2014

bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 cmb, bicep2 south pole, b-mode polarization, intelligent designer, cosmic inflation, gravitational wave, john kovac harvard, Chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, andrei linde stanford, alan guth mit, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics

bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 cmb, bicep2 south pole, b-mode polarization, intelligent designer, cosmic inflation, gravitational wave, john kovac harvard, Chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, andrei linde stanford, alan guth mit, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics

LET PLANCK DO RIGHT BY THE WORLD

June 30, 2014

Things are hotting up. This is what will happen in a conference in Valencia, Spain later this week:

Another issue of particular interest is the results of the BICEP2 experiment, which according to recent announcement, establish some primary evidence of the cosmic inflation process that occurred in the first moments of the universe after the Big Bang. “A presentation and discussion of the results will be held as well as the confirmation or contestation that should be provided by the European satellite Planck. This issue is to be one of the hot moments of the Conference”, Fuster states.

Another report has it that a wood-framed glass case has been set up in front of Alan Guth’s MIT office to hold the forthcoming Nobel Diploma:

“It” is not just any prize but one thing in particular: a citation for the Nobel Prize in physics. Even since his remarkable work analyzing the gravitational ripples after the big bang, Guth’s perhaps inevitable acceptance of a Swedish-accented phone call from the Nobel committee is now the talk of the physics world.

When Planck issued its main results in 2013, no one asked them about corroborating the Nobel prizewinning COBE Satellite discovery of the 2.7 degree K cosmic blackbody spectrum, and the Planck team never said anything. They knew there was hide nor hair of this blackbody in the sky – but they kept mum. Faces were saved and science was sacrificed.

Now bicep2 is being readied for the next round of Big Bang Nobel Prizes. The first necessary step towards this – the publication of the discovery in a refereed journal – has already been accomplished. The dust issue will blow over (It was planned that way!). So the only other thing that is necessary now is for Planck to keep mum on bicep2 instrumental botch up. That will clear the way to filling Guth’s glass case.

Believe me, the Planck people are smart cookies, and if anyone within the establisahment has figured out that bicep2 was a scandalous instrumental botch up, the Planck people have. In fact, I would go so far as to surmise that they have known this from long before I ever came on the scene.

Since the Nobelgivers will not read Internet blog sites, they will never know that there were any instrumental issues in absence of any indications from Planck. Everything will be shipshape for the award to proceed.

(Have you been enjoying as much as I have this jockeying for position among the potential Inflation Nobel candidates? Kovac and Guth have the most campaign clout going for them!)

Don’t be COBEd by Planck yet once again, World! Don’t let them biceptwo you too. Don’t let them equivocate. Remember this:

planck satellite, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 cmb, bicep2 telescope, jean-jacques dordain esa, galactic dust, b-mode polarization, cosmic inflation, gravitational wave, john kovac harvard, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli

planck satellite, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 cmb, bicep2 telescope, jean-jacques dordain esa, galactic dust, b-mode polarization, cosmic inflation, gravitational wave, john kovac harvard, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli

WHY BICEP2 PAPER SHOULD BE RETRACTED, PART III

June 28, 2014

PART III: THE IMAGE FAULT
APERTURE FAULT + FOCAL PLANE FAULT => IMAGE FAULT

III.1 Image presentation

When the Bicep2 sky images of polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (an all pervasive isotropic radiation with no directionality of any kind) were unveiled, they were plotted on a Right Ascension-Declination diagram with different scales for the different axes. On this diagram, the full Moon would look like a vertical bar. In Figure 5 below, I have resized one such diagram to where the full Moon would look like a circular disc.


Figure 5

And what do we see here?! There was a pronounced preference of the gravitational waves produced during the inflation era 14 billion years ago to favor the Earthly coordinate system. Lord how mysteriously you do work!

A first coincidence?

Wait a moment. Don’t answer. There’s more.

III.2 Little boxes little boxes ….

Now this point requires that you sit down with your kid and give him/her a red pencil and ask him/her to mark as many right angles as can be found.

All of them are perfectly aligned with RA-Dec coordinate system.

A second coincidence?

What does the kid say?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.