MAINAU DECLARATION 2015: A grotesque joke

July 6, 2015

The Mainau Declaration is presented first, with reference numbers added. My commentary follows.

Mainau Declaration 2015 on Climate Change

We undersigned scientists, who have been awarded Nobel Prizes [1], have come to the shores of Lake Constance in southern Germany, to share insights with promising young researchers [2], who like us come from around the world. Nearly 60 years ago, here on Mainau, a similar gathering of Nobel Laureates in science issued a declaration of the dangers inherent in the newly found technology of nuclear weapons—a technology derived from advances in basic science. So far we have avoided nuclear war though the threat remains [3]. We believe that our world today faces another threat of comparable magnitude [4].

Successive generations of scientists have helped create a more and more prosperous world. This prosperity has come at the cost of a rapid rise in the consumption of the world’s resources. If left unchecked, our ever-increasing demand for food, water, and energy will eventually overwhelm the Earth’s ability to satisfy humanity’s needs, and will lead to wholesale human tragedy. Already, scientists who study Earth’s climate are observing the impact of human activity.

In response to the possibility of human-induced climate change, the United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to provide the world’s leaders a summary of the current state of relevant scientific knowledge. While by no means perfect, we believe that the efforts that have led to the current IPCC Fifth Assessment Report represent the best source of information regarding the present state of knowledge on climate change. We say this not as experts in the field of climate change, but rather as a diverse group of scientists [5] who have a deep respect for and understanding of the integrity of the scientific process [6].

Although there remains uncertainty as to the precise extent of climate change, the conclusions of the scientific community contained in the latest IPCC report are alarming, especially in the context of the identified risks of maintaining human prosperity in the face of greater than a 2°C rise in average global temperature. The report concludes that anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the likely cause of the current global warming of the Earth. Predictions from the range of climate models indicate that this warming will very likely increase the Earth’s temperature over the coming century by more than 2°C above its pre-industrial level unless dramatic reductions are made in anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases over the coming decades.

Based on the IPCC assessment, the world must make rapid progress towards lowering current and future greenhouse gas emissions to minimize the substantial risks of climate change. We believe that the nations of the world must take the opportunity at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris in December 2015 to take decisive action to limit future global emissions. This endeavor will require the cooperation of all nations, whether developed or developing, and must be sustained into the future in accord with updated scientific assessment.

COMMENTARY:

[1] “We undersigned scientists” are some 36 signatories from a pool of some 65 scientists who might have signed. For whatever reasons, some 30 scientists from the pool did not sign. One dissenter was jeered away and made to appear to be a senile fool.

[2] “promising young researchers” – in what way does this expression add to the context? Who are they trying to impress? Basically they are saying: We mature gliterati and these junior glitterati have come together to give you hoi polloi a little of our priceless wisdom.

[3] What did the Mainau declaration of 60 years ago have to do with the world avoiding nuclear war thus far? There is no evidence it had any effect. While an individual scientist can have an impact with powers that be because of his moral authority and sincerity, collective representations by the elite are pretty much useless. It is creating history for the sake of the signatories.

[4] “threat of comparable magnitude” of nuclear war and climate change? This is like saying the war on terror and the war on poverty have comparable magnitudes. This is meaningless.

[5] “diverse group of scientists” – five out of the 36 signatories were there to promote Big Bang. Three of these five were the movers behind this declaration. They are the ones who were in visible evidence. These five are under a dark cloud (because of the exposition that their Nobel discoveries were a combination of sham, scam and fraud.) This declaration is a stratagem to distract attention from that fact. If instead of climate change the burning issue today were chemical pollution of Earth’s aquifers, that is the cause this coterie would have jumped on. They just needed some global bandwagon to get on, and fete themselves out of the jam.

Speaking of climate, one of the three movers is a cigarette-smoking-man.

[6] “integrity of the scientific process” – these five are absolutely the last people on this periled planet to speak of integrity of the scientific process.

One of the movers told blatant scientific lies at Lindau Nobel 2012 to the “promising young researchers” then, and never retracted it. He and the organizers of Lindau Nobel made a decision to let his lie stand. To the organizers, saving his face was more important than saving science.

And these very organizers are now going to save the world?! They are doing the same thing here – using the Lindau Nobel platform and the climate change stratagem to rescue sham Nobel Laureates.

Indeed, what the Big Bang Nobel Gang is doing very efficiently and very rapidly is cheapening the long-traditioned institution of the Nobel Prize.

Because of all these reasons, the Mainau Declaration 2015 should be seen as a grotesque joke.

LORD HAVE MERCY!

LINDAU NOBEL LAUREATES MEETING 2015: Opium den?

July 4, 2015

The Lindau Nobel Meetings have ended. As far as I can tell, there was nothing done on the matter described in the following graphic. Physics’s Cigarette-smoking-man leaves his great big matzo ball hanging out there, while further swinging his cute butt on stage and pretending to be the grand rock-star inspirer to the world’s young.

These meetings have devolved to a dark platform for various parties to execute various agendas. A scamming physicist craving a narcissistic fix can go there and tell utter scientific lies, and then engage in great bravado over telling these lies. Then, pleasurably wasted, they lay back and luxuriate in some kind of trance. Then the organizers of the meeting spread these lies thick all over the world with the help of videos and such. Then they let these lies stand in perpetuity.

The other Big Bang scammers – Brian Schmidt, Saul Perlmutter, George Smoot and Robert Wilson – were also peddling their wares. They continue to peddle their totally fraudulent creation as established science.

Brian Schmidt, David Gross and George Smoot – in an attempt to shine even more limelight on themselves – cooked up this bizarre climate change manifesto! I don’t understand this. Serious people around the world are working their tail off to address this problem. Tough international negotiations are going on. There are powerful forces and counter-forces contending. How does it help anything for some intellectual elites to put their John Hancock on a piece of paper with beautiful words and invite the media for a photo shoot?

All this in the name of helping the select young talent find their path.

LORD HAVE MERCY!

DAVID GROSS LEAVES HIS MATZO BALL HANGING OUT THERE!

Lindau Nobel Laureates Meeting, Lindau Nobel Laureates Meeting 2015, Lindau Nobel Meeting, Lindau Nobel Meeting 2015, Nobel Prize Physics, David Gross Nobel Laureate, David Gross ucsb, David Gross Nobel Prize, Robert Laughlin Nobel Laureate

Lindau Nobel Laureates Meeting, Lindau Nobel Laureates Meeting 2015, Lindau Nobel Meeting, Lindau Nobel Meeting 2015, Nobel Prize Physics, David Gross Nobel Laureate, David Gross ucsb, David Gross Nobel Prize, Robert Laughlin Nobel Laureate

REGARDING DAVID GROSS

[Click to enlarge]
Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting, Lindau Nobel Lureate Meeting 2015, Lindau Nobel Meeting, Lindau Nobel Meeting 2015, David Gross, David Gross Nobel Prize, David Gross Nobel Laureate, David Gross ucsb, Asymptotic Freedom, David Gross bet

Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting, Lindau Nobel Lureate Meeting 2015, Lindau Nobel Meeting, Lindau Nobel Meeting 2015, David Gross, David Gross Nobel Prize, David Gross Nobel Laureate, David Gross ucsb, Asymptotic Freedom, David Gross bet

BIG BANG: Government-aided second and third order frauds…

July 2, 2015

Folks, the US Government is moving right along, vigorously pumping new money into Big Bang Cosmology. Your tax dollars at work.

A project to study the origins of the universe that is led, in part, by scientists at UC San Diego has won a $5 million grant from the National Science Foundation, the school announced Thursday.
The funding to support the Simons Array, which will consist of three powerful telescopes in Chile’s Atacama desert, will pay for three years of observation and data analysis of the Big Bang, along with graduate student stipends, undergraduate research scholarships, travel and other operational expenses, according to UCSD.

And there are other Big Bang scams in various stages of development (DESI, WFIRST…). The following is a second order fraud in the making. The idea here is that since there exists such a pristine, picture perfect blackbody spectrum in the sky, let us now look for the minutest imperfactions in that spectrum to detail the early history of Big Bang (like studying that beauty spot on the perfect face of Cindy Crawford).


COBE’s measurement 25 years ago is “still the best, the gold standard,” said Jim Peebles, a physicist at Princeton University.
But more sensitive measurements should undoubtedly reveal small deviations from the blackbody curve that COBE measured. That’s because anything that injected energy into the universe after it was a few months old should have distorted this spectrum somewhat, said Alan Kogut, a physicist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.
“There’s a whole lot of things you can learn” from such distortions, he said.

So these folks are taking their own first-order fraud to be a valid and established scientific fact, and are looking to build on it with more millions of your dollars. In effect, they have cooked up the second order fraud.

Here is a statement about how very minute distortion in that perfect blackbody spectrum they would be looking for. Remember, the more minute variations you are looking to measure, the more perfect the existing blackbody spectrum has to be.

PIXIE will compare the CMB to a full-aperture blackbody calibrator to measure spectral distortions with sensitivity μ < 10-8 for the chemical potential and y < 2 x 10-9 for Compton distortions. Sensitivity at these levels opens a new window to the early universe, probing physical processes ranging from Big Bang cosmology to dark matter decay/annihilation to the nature of the first stars responsible for reionization.

As I have told you many times in many ways in many levels of scientific detail for the last eight years, there is no blackbody in the sky in any approximation, and the actual CMB power in the sky is orders of magnitude smaller than the 2.7 K blackbody power in that spectral region. This fact is known most of all to the very people who are proposing these new ventures to be build on the selfsame blackbody.

They are defrauding the taxpayers. The same way dead people continue to receive social security checks monthly, Big Bang is continuing to receive its social security checks on a regular basis.

THE BIG BANG COSMOLOGY TOUTS: They really peddle their wares!

July 2, 2015

[Click to enlarge]
Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Theory, Big Bang Cosmology, Stephen Hawking, Stephen Hawking Big Bang Theory, Big Bang Theory science, Stephen Hawking scam, Steven Weinberg, Steven Weinberg Nobel, David Gross, David Gross Nobel, David Gross ucsb, Michael Turner, Michael Turner Chicago, Michael Turner Kavli Institute, Lawrence Krauss

Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Theory, Big Bang Cosmology, Stephen Hawking, Stephen Hawking Big Bang Theory, Big Bang Theory science, Stephen Hawking scam, Steven Weinberg, Steven Weinberg Nobel, David Gross, David Gross Nobel, David Gross ucsb, Michael Turner, Michael Turner Chicago, Michael Turner Kavli Institute, Lawrence Krauss

SAFEGUARDING HUMANITY IN THE HOMEPLACE, ON THE FINAL FRONTIER

June 24, 2015

[Click to enlarge]

Bibhas De, Bibhas De book, Big Bang Cosmology book, Big Bang Theory book, Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Cosmology fraud, scientific misconduct, science fraud, the great american fraud

Bibhas De, Bibhas De book, Big Bang Cosmology book, Big Bang Theory book, Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Cosmology fraud, scientific misconduct, science fraud, the great american fraud

A SNAPSHOT FOR LINDAU NOBEL 2015 ATTENDEES: David Gross

June 23, 2015

[Click to enlarge]
Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting, Lindau Nobel Lureate Meeting 2015, Lindau Nobel Meeting, Lindau Nobel Meeting 2015, David Gross, David Gross Nobel Prize, David Gross ucsb, Asymptotic Freedom, David Gross bet

Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting, Lindau Nobel Lureate Meeting 2015, Lindau Nobel Meeting, Lindau Nobel Meeting 2015, David Gross, David Gross Nobel Prize, David Gross ucsb, Asymptotic Freedom, David Gross bet

BIZARRE CELEBRATION AT PRINCETON: “That old gang of mine?”

June 17, 2015

Have you heard the expression “Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic”?

How about “Whistling in the graveyard”?

I am trying to think of another example of a bizarre celebration like the one below, but I come up empty.

Four Big Bang Nobel Laureates (John Mather, Saul Perlmutter, Adam Riess and Robert Wilson) joined assorted luminaries at Princeton to celebrate 50 years of excellence in scamming and defrauding the world. Check out the weirdorama here.

P. J. E. Peebles, P. J. E. Peebles Princeton, Jim Peebles, Jim Peebles Princeton, John Mather Nobel Prize, Robert Wilson Nobel Prize, Paul Richards Berkeley, Big Bang Relic Radiation, cmb50, cmb, cosmic microwave background radiation, Big Bang blackbody spectrum, Big Bang Theory science, Big Bang cosmology

P. J. E. Peebles, P. J. E. Peebles Princeton, Jim Peebles, Jim Peebles Princeton, John Mather Nobel Prize, Robert Wilson Nobel Prize, Paul Richards Berkeley, Big Bang Relic Radiation, cmb50, cmb, cosmic microwave background radiation, Big Bang blackbody spectrum, Big Bang Theory science, Big Bang cosmology

Have you heard the Princeton motto “Princeton in the nation’s service and in the service of all nations”?

Or their Latin motto “Dei Sub Numine Viget”, meaning “Under the protection of the Lord she prospers”?

LORD HAVE MERCY!

HOW LANGUAGE RESCUED BIG BANG THEORY

June 14, 2015

There have been sad news items lately reminding us of that old Dutch proverb from the Brueghel painting:

He who has spilt his porridge cannot scrape it all up again

Nobel Laureate James Watson, who made some unfortunate remarks a long time ago, is in the news because, reportedly, he had fallen on hard times in the aftermath of those remarks and had recently to sell his Nobel Prize gold medal.

Nobel Laureate Tim Hunt recently slipped up with his language, and was forced to resign immediately. But the reverberations are continuing.

I am not going to judge them.

But I got to thinking. If language can sink Nobels, can it also rescue Nobels? Read on. The applicable proverb in this case is in the diagram.

Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Theory, Big Bang cosmology fraud, CMB, Cosmic Microwave Background, COBE Satellite, Big Bang Blackbody Spectrum, Big Bang relic radiation

Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Theory, Big Bang cosmology fraud, CMB, Cosmic Microwave Background, COBE Satellite, Big Bang Blackbody Spectrum, Big Bang relic radiation

GRUBER PRIZE CONTINUES TO PROMOTE BIG BANG COSMOLOGY FRAUD

June 11, 2015

Yo Gruber Foundation, the Big Bang cosmologists are using you (and other prize-givers) to perpetuate a fraudulent scientific enterprise. They are engineering these prizes to be given to Big Bang. Then they are turning around and telling the funding agencies that Big Bang has been reaffirmed by these prizes. Then the funding agencies, thus reassured, are shelling out more millions. And so it goes.

But the world is now hip to all these because of me. So the reputation of your prize is on a slippery slope. Except for the Big Bang-ers, nobody pays any mind to your prize. Mr. Gruber’s hard earned money and his noble vision are both going down the Big Bang drain.

Check out my book if you like.

A STRATEGIC REAFFIRMATION OF BIG BANG COSMOLOGY

Folks, the Gruber Cosmology Prize continues with its plan to promote and bolster fraudulent science. This year’s prize is being used as the occasion to emphatically reaffirm Big Bang to the world:

The current scientific interpretation of the universe began to crystallize in the mid-1960s with the discovery of relic radiation from the infancy of the universe. This radiation, called the cosmic microwave background (CMB), finally allowed scientists to test the longstanding and sometimes contradictory predictions of competing cosmologies. The winner: the Big Bang model— a universe that arose out of an inconceivably dense state of matter and energy, and has been expanding and cooling ever since, eventually coalescing into today’s familiar skyscape of planets, stars, and galaxies.

The thing to note in this long and detailed write-up is that there is not a single mention of the most seminal observation of the 2.7 K blackbody – the established connection between two entirely independent, totally unrelated entities: Big Bang Relic radiation (a prediction of Big Bang Theory) on one hand, and CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background, an observed radiation field) on the other. This blackbody linkage (which was a fraud) is now being very carefully skirted around – the way a furtive thief at night skirts around lighted places.

A QUESTION OF IDENTITY

Notice the clever working of the language: “This radiation, called the cosmic microwave background (CMB), …” This says that CMB is the name we have given to the Big Bang relic radiation. They are one and the same thing.

The identicality of the unrelated entities CMB radiation and Big Bang Relic radiation – which identification is the heart and soul of Big Bang – is now being taken as received truth. No scientific proof of the identicality is needed anymore. All you have to do is constantly intone:


You say potato, I say potahto…
CMB is Relic radiation.
Relic radiation is CMB.
Let’s call the whole Blackbody thing off.

So you can ask: If the identicality is self-evident now in 2015, why did they spend $400 million in the 1980s (COBE Satellite) to try to establish the identicality? What has changed about the Universe in 30 or so years?

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

This business of things beginning to “crystallize” in the mid-1960s is a Molière-esque farce. Not only Penzias and Wilson did not observe any blackbody, but that 3.5 K “crystallization” temperature they reported was also patently wrong. It was grossly miscalculated. The correct calculation would have given a temperature of no significance to Big Bang. So Penzias and Wilson – while observing CMB at a single frequency – in no way, shape or form did anything to crystallize Big Bang. And every following Big Bang satellite experiment solidly DISPROVED Big Bang. Three satellites in all.

So the thing for you to very clearly understand is that the issues here are not something of my making. They are 100% objective, real and fatal scientific miscarriages. Every time science told us something, the Big Bang cosmologists told us the opposite.

THEY, the Big Bang cosmologists themselves, said that CMB can be identified as relic radiation because the former has been observed to have the predicted signature Big Bang blackbody form. They gloried over this discovery. The blackbody form made Big Bang unquestionably correct, THEY said. They made their triumphal ramp walk on the world stage – swinging their cute butts in wide arcs. Then they hit the Big Bang dissidents hard over the head with this blackbody. Then they said: Dissidents, go die so we can continue with our fun and games. They had some “pretty harsh words” for my teacher who, it now turns out, was right all along. Let us not forget all these, folks!

OUTRUNNING THEIR OWN SCAM

THEY are now deep-sixing the blackbody because it has been exposed as a fraud, because they got found out. They are not accepting any responsibility for this, and they are offering no explanation or elaboration on this. With that blackbody-based identity gone, the identity of CMB and relic radiation is now by diktat, period. Jawohl, Herr Obersturmbannführer!

Why the hell are these people being allowed by the scientific establishment to get away with repeatedly and flagrantly perverting the course of science?! Why do they have a pass on accepting responsibility for this huge evil blackbody empire they had erected to prop up Big Bang? Why are they exempt from even the minimal standards of ethical conduct in science? How can these deniers of hard scientific evidence continue to operate unchecked?

The actual extent of this defrauding of the world is far worse: THEY know that the blackbody has been disproved and therefore CMB and Big Bang Relic radiation have been positively delinked.

THEIR EXPERIMENTERS HAVE REPEATEDLY PROVED THAT CMB IS NOT RELIC RADIATION – THAT THERE IS NO CONNECTION. THEY HAVE THEN DEEP-SIXED THIS EVIDENCE SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE WITH THEIR GIGANTIC FRAUD. THE SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISHMENT AND THE MEDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT FUNDING AGENCIES KEEP QUIET ABOUT THIS, AND LET THIS SCOURGE GO ON.

BIG BANG M.O.: SHAM AWAY, SCAM AWAY, DEFRAUD AWAY; IF YOU GET CAUGHT, WALK AWAY

Never in the history of science have so many cunning, conniving, scheming scientists enjoyed so much limelight and so much adoration for so long. The physics establishment is entirely to blame.

One gigantic Big Bang scam unfolded in real time during my watch: the BICEP2 botch up. You saw me nip this thing in the bud the very day the rolled out the discovery. Then you saw the gang try to cover it up for a year. They put a twist to it (galactic dust vs. primordial B-mode), others moved in and made a name as BICEP2 busters, never admitting the gross instrumental botch up. You saw them get a testimonial from a dishonest Planck Collaboration that the instrument was shipshape. Then, I think the private funding agencies (who, unlike the government agencies, value their own money) woke up, and put the squeeze on them. Then they went absolutely quiet.

If repeated exposing of scam science, sham science and fraud science conducted by these people cannot stop them, what will?

I ask you, what will?

This is the truth I have learned over the years of watching them: Big Bang cosmologists are not bad scientists. They are bad people operating in science.

LET’S GET CONCRETE: LET’S NAME SOME NAMES

Here is a list of people who made the decision to make this award and did the clever language-smithing. Take a good look at these – – these cheloveks, these leute – – who under their showy academic mantles are systematically corrupting your world all around you. When you gonna wake up?!

The Prize recipients are chosen by the Cosmology Selection Advisory Board. Its members are:

Andrew Fabian, University of Cambridge; Wendy Freedman, University of Chicago (Chair); Helge Kraghe, Niels Bohr Institute; Frans Pretorius, Princeton University; Sadanori Okamura, Hosei University; Subir Sarkar, University of Oxford; and Rashid Sunyaev, Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics. Owen Gingerich of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Martin Rees of the University of Cambridge also serve as special Cosmology advisors to the Foundation.

LORD HAVE MERCY!

HOW “POWERFUL” ARE THE BIG BANG COSMOLOGISTS?

June 3, 2015

Folks, from time to time I have told you that Big Bang Cosmologists are very powerful people with very powerful friends . Did you think I meant this figuratively?

Whatever they might do to control a scientific critic whom they cannot silence with within-establishment thumbscrews, will be done with extreme covertness. Any message the “target” receives will have dual interpretation. One, a perfectly innocuous – if strange – event that is just a fluke occurrence. This is for the public. The other is a message only the target is meant to interpret for himself. When he does, he is supposed to be shaking in his boots in mortal fear. He is supposed to give up on his critic activities.

Let me make up just two imaginary scenarios of many I could make up.

– The target senses that a law firm specializing in civil litigation is thoroughly checking out his web site in a way that he cannot miss. What is he supposed to make of it?

Me, I would say this does not mean anything.

– A family member from the target’s old country writes a personal letter, addressed in ink, with the full correct address and crystal clear handwriting (as this person has done like clockwork for some forty years.) The letter is now “missent” to US Carrier Strike Group 11 on high seas. It is opened, and then scotch-taped. It eventually arrives with big red stamps marked on it. What is the target supposed to make of it?

Me, I would say this does not mean anything.

LORD HAVE MERCY!

[Click to enlarge]

[Click to enlarge]


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.