When NASA’s John Mather received his Nobel Prize in 2006, his job title for a number of years prior was Senior Astrophysicist. President Bush was in the White House. Today, 12 years later, President Trump is in the White House. Mather’s job title: Senior Astrophysicist.
The Nobel Banquet Procession is a well-crafted and time-honored symbolism. When a stark departure occurs in full view of the world, there is a message there.
You can download the eBook here:
I have updated and placed my LIGO fraudbook on the Internet Archive. It will be there in perpetuity. Click on the image to download/read.
Gradually, I will try to do the same with other physics Nobel frauds.
CASEBOOK OF BIBHAS DE
The Mystery of the Hanford Empaths
ligo book, ligo fraud, ligo scambook, lsc collaboration, ligonauts, ligoneers, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo india, roger falcone aps, michael moloney aip, megan donahue aas, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, france cordova nsf director, nsf director, nallison lerner nsf, nsf oig, anne kinney nsf, diane souvaine tufts, fiona harrison caltech, anneila sargent caltech, maria zuber mit, edward witten princeton, robbert dijkgraaf princeton, rainer weiss nobel, kip thorne nobel, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l rafael reif mit, starmus 2019, starmus v
somak raychaudhury iucaa, abhay ashtekar penn state, rana adhikari caltech, sukanta bose wsu, k n vyas dae, k vijayraghavan psa, ajay k sood insa, lars heikensten nobel foundation, olga botner uppsala, nils martensson uppsala, royal swedish academy of sciences, nobel prize physics 2017
roger falcone aps, michael moloney aip, megan donahue aas, marcia mcnutt nas, rush holt aaas, institute of physics, julia higgins iop, physical review letters, Hugues Chaté prl, france cordova nsf, france a. cordova, nsf director, anne kinney nsf, edward witten princeton, robbert dijkgraaf princeton, decadal survey 2020, national science board, diane souvaine tufts, anneila sargent caltech, fiona harrison caltech, maria zuber mit, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l rafael reif mit, nils martensson uppsala, olga botner uppsala
lsc collaboration, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, kip thorne nobel, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne interstellar, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss nobel, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss mit, ligo india, ligo indigo, somak raychaudhury, somak raychaudhury iucaa, k n vyas dae, k vijayraghavan psa, ajay k. sood insa, abhay ashtekar penn state, nobel prize physics 2017
roger falcone aps, michael moloney aip, megan donahue aas, marcia mcnutt nas, rush holt aaas, france cordova nsf, allison lerner nsf, anne kinney nsf, edward witten, robbert dijkgraaf, decadal survey 2020, national science board, diane souvaine tufts, anneila sargent caltech, fiona harrison caltech, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo
lsc collaboration, ligo india, k n vyas dae, k vijayraghavan psa, nobel prize physics 2017, lars heikensten nobel foundation, carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, christina moberg kth, royal swedish academy of sciences
“The Astrophysics and Cosmology Theory program supports proposals that primarily are involved with theoretical particle astrophysics and big-bang cosmology as well as more speculative string theory-inspired cosmologies.
….
Research in cosmology and astrophysics topics not mentioned above is supported by the Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Grants Program in the MPS Division of Astronomical Sciences.”
– NSF Statement
roger falcone aps, michael moloney aip, megan donahue aas, marcia mcnutt nas, rush holt aaas, france cordova nsf, allison lerner nsf, anne kinney nsf, edward witten, robbert dijkgraaf, decadal survey 2020, national science board, ostp white house, diane souvaine tufts, anneila sargent caltech, fiona harrison caltech
nobel prize physics 2017, lars heikensten nobel foundation, carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, christina moberg kth, royal swedish academy of sciences
Planck satellite, planck collaboration, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, penzias wilson, robert wilson, arno penzias, john mather nasa, george smoot, rainer weiss mit, nasa gsfc, jan tauber esa, big bang cosmology, big bang fraud, cosmic black body, cmb, france cordova nsf, anne kinney nsf, berkeley nobel laureates, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud
starmus v, starmus 2019, roger falcone aps, michael moloney aip, megan donahue aas, marcia mcnutt nas, carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, lars heikensten nobel foundation, christina moberg kth, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, nobel prize physics 1978, nobel prize physics 2006
Click to enlarge and enjoy!
roger falcone aps, michael moloney aip, megan donahue aas, marcia mcnutt nas, rush holt aaas, france cordova nsf, allison lerner nsf, anne kinney nsf, edward witten, robbert dijkgraaf, decadal survey 2020, national science board, diane souvaine tufts, anneila sargent caltech, fiona harrison caltech, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l. rafael reif mit, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss ligo, john mather nasa, george smoot, saul perlmutter berkeley, brian schmidt anu, starmus 2019, starmus v
lars heikensten nobel foundation, carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, christina moberg kth, royal swedish academy of sciences, nobel foundation, nobel prize physics 2006, nobel prize physics 2011, nobel prize physics 2017
france cordova nsf, allison lerner nsf, diane souvaine tufts, anne kinney nsf, anneila sargent caltech, fiona harrison caltech, maria zuber mit, marcia mcnutt nas, nergis mavalvala mit, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel, kip thorne interstellar, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel, david reitze caltech, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, lsc collaboration, thomas f rosenbaum caltech, l rafael reif mit, roger falcone aps, michael moloney aip, megan donahue aas, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nsf fraud, edward witten, robbert dijkgraaf, Lamar University Academic Lecture Series, Montauk Observatory, NAUKA 0+, all-russia science festival
starmus 2019, starmus v, ligo india, ligo indigo, k n vyas dae, Kamlesh Nilkanth Vyas, somak raychaudhury iucaa, tarun souradeep, sukanta bose wsu, rana adhikari caltech, c s unnikrishnan tifr, k vijayraghavan psa, ashutosh sharma dst, ajay k sood insa, carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, lars heikensten nobel foundation, christina moberg kth, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, nobel prize physics 2017, ligo nobel prize, ligo fraud
In 1964 one of mankind’s greatest scientific feats occurred: the discovery of the predicted Big Bang Black Body relic radiation on the sky by two guys named Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson. This feat would be recognized in 1978 by the award of the Nobel Prize in Physics. And just recently, the Planck Scientific Collaboration has issued a resounding reaffirmation of this discovery. Next summer Robert Wilson will be celebrated at the Starmus V Festival in Switzerland.
Fascinatingly, the discovery paper was very brief, like the Watson-Crick discovery paper.
However, if in the latter case brevity was the soul of wit, in the former case it was the heart of the scam.
When I read the PW paper for the first time with an investigator’s mind-set, I was struck by the fact that there is absolutely no description of the instrument they used. I looked in the scientific literature, and I could not find anything there either.
Here was my problem. This was a satellite communication equipment and as such was most likely set up to receive two orthogonal linear polarizations. But the cosmic black body radiation is unpolarized. How can you receive the total power from this black body with this antenna? You have either to add the power in the two linear polarizations to get the full power on the sky, or use one polarization and account for a factor of 2. What did they do? This is the information I was looking for. In other words, I wanted to know what comes behind the Holmdel Antenna that has become a visual icon. What’s in that shed? Not being able to find the answer, here’s what I wrote in my 2015 book The Falsifiers of the Universe: .. the powers in the two polarizations would then have to be added before determining the Antenna Temperature. At 4 GHz, this feed would probably be a substantial waveguide contraption, certainly not something one would forget to mention in a paper where this fact was of paramount importance.
Sometime later I learned that there was an exhibit of the PW equipment in Deutsches Museum, and photos of this were available at this web site. So now we know what’s in the shed. We can go back to my problem and resolve it.
Refer to the figure. Radiation travels from left to right. The silver horn is a replica to represent the Holmdel antenna outside the shed. Everything else is inside the shed. This is the original equipment. The horn has a square cross-section. As unpolarized radiation from sky travels through this square pipe as two orthogonal linear polarizations, it is gradually transformed to a circular pipe so as to be able to accommodate a device called an Orthomode Transducer (OMT). This is the device marked A by me. At A, the OMT separates out the two orthogonal polarizations. Half the power travels downward at A through a standard rectangular waveguide that carries the polarization with the electric field vector perpendicular to the plane of the paper. This portion of the radiation is used for calibration purposes. Thus, half the unknown signal power to be measured is prevented from going into the receiver. The other half – where the field is vertical and in the plane of the paper – travels to the right and enters the receiver at the point marked B by me via a standard rectangular waveguide, seen coming out of the plane of the paper. This is the entire power Penzias and Wilson analyzed, and deduced from this a 3.5 K black body in the sky.
Michael Fletcher has also provided a block diagram of the instrument, endorsed by Arno Penzias.
So, half the power that was incident on the Holmdel antenna accounted for the entire discovery of a black body of 3.5 K – a temperature that happened to be just right to clinch Big Bang. Morale of the story: Lose a factor of 2, get a Nobel.
This is only one of the many fatal faults of this experiment. In no way, shape or form did Penzias and Wilson find any black body of any temperature on the sky. Nor did John Mather. Nor did Herbert Gush, nor anyone else for that matter
In this context I remind you also of these old graphics:
