ON CORONAVIRUS TREATMENT: Guest Commentary by Chris Currie

April 1, 2020

There are two fundamentally different approaches for enabling victims of viruses like COVID-19 (which created fluids in human lungs) to survive long enough for their bodies to create enough antibodies to rid their bodies of such deadly viruses.

1. THE HORIZONTAL APPROACH: This is the approach that our news agencies have been promoting EXCLUSIVELY (apparently in order to please their corporate sponsors who can profit handsomely from this approach). I have seen numerous video clips on TV showing COVID-19 victims who were lying flat on their backs or on their sides while apparently hooked up to “ventilating” machines. The problem with this approach is that the force of gravity is working against them by distributing the fluids created by the COVID-19 virus pretty much evenly throughout their lungs. This the primary reason why a large number of COVID-19 victims have died even though they were hooked up to ventilator devices! While providing temporary breathing relief, the HORIZONTAL APPROACH makes the COVID-19 disease potentially MORE deadly!

2. THE VERTICAL APPROACH: This approach is where the COVID-19 victim is forced to “sleep while sitting up” (and sitting up while awake), so that the force of gravity concentrates the fluids created by the COVID-19 virus to the bottom of their lungs. This enables the victims to continue breathing long enough for their bodies to create enough antibodies to rid their bodies of the COVID-19 viruses. My oldest uncle, Lawrence D. Dickey, told me that he survived the 1918 Spanish Flu (which was far deadlier than the COVID-19 virus), because his doctor forced him to “sleep while sitting up.” He went on to become a highly respected doctor himself and a medical pioneer who published the book “Clinical Ecology.”

3. Unlike the Horizontal Approach described above, the Vertical Approach is essentially FREE and 100% SAFE to use as well as being more effective for saving people’s lives. Apparently, that is why this approach is being censored by our irresponsible news agencies (because there is little or no profit to be gained by using the vertical approach). Last night on MSNBC’s “Last Word With Lawrence O’Donnell Show” Anthony Fauci mentioned that “clinical trials” of various COVID-19 treatment options were being handled by “private interests” (i.e. corporations that are NOT interested in promoting the Vertical Approach), but now that there are no longer enough ventilators to meet our nation’s rapidly growing COVID 19 treatment needs, if our news agencies advocated that the Vertical Approach be used by COVID-19 victims who can’t get ventilator support, that would not only save their lives, it would also serve as a nationwide “clinical trial” which I believe will prove that the Vertical Approach is in fact more effective for saving the lives of COVID-19 Victims than the Horizontal Approach!

April 1, 2020

Coronavirus policy-making: Decision Analysis

March 31, 2020

k vijayraghavan psakelvin droegemeier ostp, k vijayraghavan psa

UPDATE 04/01/2020: I have looked at many photos of Coronavirus patients in hospitals. The patients are mostly lying flat on their backs.


A silence of the yakking intellectuals

March 28, 2020


CORONAVIRUS: Guest Commentary

March 27, 2020

The following commentary on the the Coronavirus Pandemic was published anonymously in a medical forum. The writer is afraid to use his name. Stephen Crothers reproduced this report in his Facebook account. I have copied from his post.

Thinking people should also read a series of timely posts made by Lubos Motl in his blog site The Reference Frame. Motl is a respected physicist. He is using clear logic and uncluttered reason.

I am not an expert on any aspect of the pandemic. What is clear to me is that Dr Fauci is flying without a radar. He does not know which direction to confidently go, and is doing what is safe: erring on the side of caution. I think he knows that himself. But when you fly without a radar, the only safe thing you can do is keep flying. So, how does this end?

I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply cannot make accurate assessments.

This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.

The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.

The problem is the test is known not to work.

It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.

Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.

The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.

And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.

If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if a osteogenesis is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.

If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.

And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.

Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.

They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.

There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.

All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.

Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.

You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.

Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.

Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.

Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.

But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.

1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.

2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.

3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.

4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.

Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.

They cannot “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.

Academic Corruption: American Astronomical Society

March 17, 2020

philip bucksbaum apsmegan donahue aas, philip bucksbaum aps, michael moloney aip, steven chu aaas, james ulvestad nsf, petra rudolf eps, jonathan flint cbe, chandrima shaha insa

Reader reveals Brian Greene’s fake intellectualism

March 12, 2020

Brian Greene’s new book Until the end of time has been greeted with rave reviews from high places. These reviewers are clearly sycophants trying to give Greene a sales boost. The following review is an eye-opener. (Click twice to enlarge.)

brian greene books

Also see this closely-similar review.

How Big Bang infiltrates the Great Religions

March 9, 2020

Big Bang at first is science fraud. However, do not stop there. It is also garbage science that is being stuffed into the heads of your children – whether at school, at science museums, at PBS and so on. It is also a huge commercial merchandising business. And it is fast-growing social and spiritual evil. Consider how more than a billion Catholics around the world have been told to accept Big Bang as God’s own truth.

Interestingly, however, when they tried to impose Big Bang on Buddhism, the Dalai Lama would have none of it!

Not even Ian Fleming could have dreamed up a world-domination scenario that is more evil. I am not angry for no reason.

WFIRST satellite update

March 8, 2020

WFIRST satellite was conceived a decade ago to serve as a monument to Big Bang fraud Saul Perlmutter who got the 2011 Nobel Prize for discovering dark energy. These Big Bang dweebs are experts at getting the taxpayers to feather their nest and tickle their ego. However, when it became too starkly obvious what was going on, Perlmutter’s visible role was scaled back, and other unrelated science programs were added – making it look less like a Perlmutter commemorative in the sky. The following are my two graphics from 2011 and 2016, suggesting that this was another Big Bang megafraud taking shape.

The Trump administration wants to shut down this program. However, its backers are mobilizing democratic congressional support to rescue it.

You might rightly ask: If this is such a grand fraud, how come no fraudmeisters from Princeton are involved?! They sure are. David Spergel of Princeton is one of the WFIRST leaders. He is a Big Bang made man.

wfirst satellite, saul perlmutter, david spergel princeton

Here is the conclusion from my book:


Detective Dreamheron: World’s first detective for space-based crimes

March 7, 2020

Since I am the world’s first detective for space-based crimes, I made up this diagram – myself among my peer group! I like them all.

Why is NASA’s fraud Nobelist John Mather invincible?

March 5, 2020

(Recycling a couple of old graphics):

john mather nasajohn mather nasa, cobe satellite, cmb, cosmic black body
john mather nasa