ATTN: PHYSICS ESTABLISHMENT

As I am working on the Big Bang Fraud Book (see my previous post), I am letting you know that the three major areas of allegation against the physics establishment will be:

(1). THE PENZIAS-WILSON-DICKE-PEEBLES SCAM

(The scientific linkage of Penzias & Wilson observation to the Big Bang Blackbody in 1965 by Dicke, Peebles & Co. of Princeton was a total scam which has withstood the physics establishment’s close examination for a period approaching half a century.)

(2). COBE SATELLITE FRAUD AND THE ANTENNA SWITCHEROO

(In addition to reporting the fraudulent blackbody spectrum, John Mather may have made last minute crucial – and bungling – design changes without telling the scientific community – before or after his “discovery”.)

(3). THE HERBERT GUSH NON-DISCOVERY

(The Gush discovery came close on the heels of the Mather discovery, and confirmed the latter with equally phenomenal precision. May be people felt secure in the knowledge that Gush had Mather’s six. However, Gush did not observe a cosmic blackbody – his publication in Physical Review Letters notwithstanding.)

I am also letting you know that I gave a key figure in each area a way to preempt these allegations by offering any scientific information I may have missed. To date, I have not received any responses to my emails (below.)

A LETTER TO PROFESSOR EDWARD “Ned” WRIGHT, UCLA – A VETERAN OF THE COBE SATELLITE – ABOUT THE PENZIAS-WILSON-DICKE-PEEBLES SCAM:

Subject: A question about Big Bang
Date: 5/23/2011 3:24:36 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Dear Professor Wright:

I am at a loss figuring out something – and would greatly appreciate your enlightening me on this.

In 1965 Penzias & Wilson reported an excess Antenna Noise Temperature of 3.5 +/- 1 degrees Kelvin.

This is a handy number engineers use to characterize noise in their system. Not only is this NOT a temperature of anything – it is also a system-specific number. If Penzias & Wilson had used another antenna, this number would be different.

So why has it been reported for the past 45 years that Penzias and Wilson observed a 3.5 +/- 1 degrees K Cosmic Blackbody?

For example, one of your teaching web pages says:

“Penzias & Wilson were studying the radiation collected by a large horn antenna in New Jersey when they found an excess radiation at 7.35 cm wavelength that was equivalent to a 3.5 +/- 1 K blackbody.”

How did a system specific Antenna Noise Temperature at the output of a receiver in New Jersey come to be equated exactly to an absolute Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature?

Thank you in advance for setting me straight on this.

Sincerely,
Bibhas De


On 7/2/11 I received the following response from UCLA’s Professor Wright:

“Actually antenna temperature is the temperature of the blackbody cavity that would give the same signal as the one being seen — at least in the Rayleigh-Jeans limit. So for an isotropic signal it is independent of the antenna. For a real antenna on the Earth it will be different because of side and back lobes seeing the hot ground.

–Edward L. (Ned) Wright, David Saxon Presidential Chair in Physics
Professor of Physics and Astronomy”

A LETTER TO DR. GARY HINSHAW, NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER – ARCHIVIST FOR COBE SATELLITE – ABOUT THE COBE SATELLITE FRAUD AND ANTENNA SWITCHEROO:

Subject: Re: LAMBDA REQUEST
Date: 1/10/2011 9:47:03 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Dear Dr. Hinshaw:

I am sorry to impose on you again but, upon due diligence, I have not been able to find answers to a couple of material questions in the open literature or in your archives. May be I am missing something, and you have the answers at your finger tips.

Please see the attachment. I would greatly appreciate any clarification you might be able to provide.

Many thanks in advance.

Sincerely yours,
Bibhas De

ATTACHMENT

A LETTER TO PROFESSOR MARK HALPERN, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – CO-DISCOVERER OF GUSH – ABOUT THE FAULTY HERBERT GUSH DISCOVERY:

Subject: Re: A request
Date: 12/22/2010 10:31:44 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time

Dear Professor Halpern:

May I take you up on your offer to answer any questions?

I have tried to pose my question as clearly as possible in the attachment. Hope it is clear.

Your response is for my edification only – so please feel free to be as pedagogic as you wish.

Many thanks in advance.

Sincerely,
Bibhas De

ATTACHMENT

A NOTE ADDED ON 3 JUNE 2011:

A LETTER TO SMOOT COSMOLOGY GROUP, UC BERKELEY ABOUT GEORGE SMOOT’S BOGUS CORROBORATION OF JOHN MATHER’S BOGUS BLACKBODY:

Subject: Question about COBE DMR
Date: 6/2/2011 3:50:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time
From: BibhasDe@
To: KMByrd@
CC: SMOOT@

Hello!

In the Big Bang Blackbody master diagram that brings together all the experiments, several points from COBE DMR experiment are plotted.

Could you give me a reference to Professor Smoot’s scientific paper where these DMR blackbody curve points were presented?

I have tried, and unfortunately, have not been able to find this information.

Many thanks in advance for your help.

Sincerely yours,

Bibhas De


(In absence of a satisfactory response to this letter, I will conclude and report that George Smoot was a collaborator in the John Mather science fraud.)

George Smoot discovery

George Smoot discovery

*****

Should I have submitted all my criticisms to peer-reviewed journals?

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s