NOBEL PRIZE FOR PHYSICS: A stained roster

Scientific fraud is not uncommon today. These incidents in themselves do not tell us that the scientific civilization is in decline. To see any such meaningful trends, we must go to a high place and view from a great distance a time-honored, high-integrity edifice. Has it remained fully intact and shining? Or has the plaster started peeling off in places and the red brick has become exposed? If you see more and more such blights appear over time, the edifice is crumbling.

What is this high place? This author’s sites.

What is the edifice? The institution of Nobel Prize.

[CLICK TO ENLARGE]
LIST OF NOBEL PRIZE FOR PHYSICS:
A tainted roster of history

LIST OF NOBEL PRIZE FOR PHYSICS:
A tainted roster of history

[Click to enlarge]

Physics Nobel Prizes for patently bogus discoveries – issued again and again and again – are a sure sign that the scientific civilization is in decline.
Question:
Are there any commonalities among these ten individuals?
If so, what can you tell from these?

References:

1978, 2006, 2011
2004

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s