Folks, all this time I have been telling you that not only is there not an experimental confirmation of the 2.7 K Big Bang relic blackbody in the sky, but there are numerous experimental determinations that this DOES NOT exist.
So when an establishment academic suggests that I am wrong (i.e. Planck Satellite HAS found the 2.7 K blackbody), I feel that in all honesty I should include that information here. The following matter has just come to my attention. You should know about it.
Is it possible then that there is an underground academic grapevine where it is known that the 2.7 K Blackbody has been confirmed by the Planck Satellite? For that is the impression being given out from within the American academic scientific establishment.
If on the other hand this academic is in any way, shape or form trying to mislead the public by issuing a terse comment like this, and then let someone else’s clear elaboration on it stand, I would consider it a damn serious business.
How is it possible that when all the satellite experimentalists and all the antenna & microwave engineers and all the bigbangistas are silent, a string theorist has the real dope on the measurement of the Blackbody Spectrum?
Absolutely nothing changes in my position. If I find this report of the Planck Satellite Blackbody Spectrum from the Planck people themselves, I will examine it and let you know here.
[Click to enlarge]
Planck Satellite results CMB Blackbody Spectrum, Prof. Matt Strassler, Rutgers University, Big Bang Cosmology Theory
Planck Satellite results CMB Blackbody Spectrum, Prof. Matt Strassler, Rutgers University, Big Bang Cosmology Theory
Tags: ESA garbage science, Intellectual poseurs, NASA's garbage science, Planck Satellite vs COBE Satellite, The Age of Fakery, What did they know and when did they know it?, When the nobles scam you
Leave a reply relevant to the above post.