BICEP2: OK, let me frame the question

BICEP2 A TOTAL INSTRUMENTAL BOTCH UP

bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys, michael turner kicp kavli chicago, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, big bang cosmology inflation theory, big bang theory gravitational waves, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli foundation

bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys, michael turner kicp kavli chicago, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, big bang cosmology inflation theory, big bang theory gravitational waves, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli foundation

Raphael Flauger ias Princeton, Subir Sarkar Oxford, David Spergel Princeton, Brian Koberlein Rochester Institute of Technology, john kovac harvard, bicep2 foreground background polarization galactic dust b-mode polarization, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys
.
INTELLECTUAL POSEURS!

The charade that is being carefully maintained that the bicep2 discovery is going through a normal, healthily combative evaluation process is intended to hide the fact that this discovery is a total concoction. It is as fake as John Mather’s blackbody. There is absolutely nothing to DISCUSS or to EVALUATE. There are no Ifs, Ands or Buts. There is no “If confirmed ….”.

Those who are discussing and evaluating are thereby legitimizing a scam discovery, and prolonging its life. They are a witting party to the scam. They are engaged in exactly the same “process” that the Mather-backers engaged in for seven years, trying to protect that fraudster.

And Planck Satellite has as much to do with confirming bicep2 results as it has to do with confirming Stephen Hawking’s World Cup prediction.

Has it ever occurred to anyone why, when the entire issue with bicep2 is engineering, the theoreticians are noisily going on and on and there is not a shred of discussion on the instrumentation and the measurement?

OK, forget about me. Has anyone even noticed that ESA has pointed to “significant question marks” with bicep2 measurements? Not foreground/background polarization etc, but actual instrumental measurement. Coming from the normally low key and tight-lipped organization that ESA is, this has to be a very well-considered position. And ESA has top flight engineers. If anyone knows how to properly design stuff to properly measure things in space, they do.

This bicep2 gig has never advanced to the point where theoreticians would have anything to contribute. The bicep2 polarizations are instrumental artifacts. The theoreticians simply took over a botched up experiment and started piling their nonsense on it, thus burying the real issues.

It is like a group of aficionados in a modern art museum conducting a learned and lofty analysis on a starkly red-colored exhibit, until the custodian comes along and tells them: It’s just the fire extinguisher.

There is something VERY WRONG with this particular scientific establishment! They are using the cloak of academic nobility to scam the hardworking, taxpaying American public.

Isn’t it past time someone in the government started to look out for that little guy called the American taxpayer vis-a-vis the Big Bang Cosmologists?!

If an investigation is conducted using an outside-establishment engineering organization that the establishment can neither control nor “get to”, this fancy schmancy hightech experiment will be exposed as the Keystone Kops job that it really is.

That is what I think happened to John Mather, leading to the permanent capping of his job at the pre-Nobel Prize level. It was a US Government action. It can happen again.

.

Raphael Flauger ias Princeton, Subir Sarkar Oxford, David Spergel Princeton, Brian Koberlein, Rochester Institute of Technology, john kovac harvard, bicep2 foreground background polarization galactic dust b-mode polarization, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys

Raphael Flauger ias Princeton, Subir Sarkar Oxford, David Spergel Princeton, Brian Koberlein Rochester Institute of Technology, john kovac harvard, bicep2 foreground background polarization galactic dust b-mode polarization, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “BICEP2: OK, let me frame the question”

  1. Ed Solheim Says:

    Keep ’em comin’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s