GRUBER PRIZE CONTINUES TO PROMOTE BIG BANG COSMOLOGY FRAUD

Yo Gruber Foundation, the Big Bang cosmologists are using you (and other prize-givers) to perpetuate a fraudulent scientific enterprise. They are engineering these prizes to be given to Big Bang. Then they are turning around and telling the funding agencies that Big Bang has been reaffirmed by these prizes. Then the funding agencies, thus reassured, are shelling out more millions. And so it goes.

But the world is now hip to all these because of me. So the reputation of your prize is on a slippery slope. Except for the Big Bang-ers, nobody pays any mind to your prize. Mr. Gruber’s hard earned money and his noble vision are both going down the Big Bang drain.

Check out my book if you like.

A STRATEGIC REAFFIRMATION OF BIG BANG COSMOLOGY

Folks, the Gruber Cosmology Prize continues with its plan to promote and bolster fraudulent science. This year’s prize is being used as the occasion to emphatically reaffirm Big Bang to the world:

The current scientific interpretation of the universe began to crystallize in the mid-1960s with the discovery of relic radiation from the infancy of the universe. This radiation, called the cosmic microwave background (CMB), finally allowed scientists to test the longstanding and sometimes contradictory predictions of competing cosmologies. The winner: the Big Bang model— a universe that arose out of an inconceivably dense state of matter and energy, and has been expanding and cooling ever since, eventually coalescing into today’s familiar skyscape of planets, stars, and galaxies.

The thing to note in this long and detailed write-up is that there is not a single mention of the most seminal observation of the 2.7 K blackbody – the established connection between two entirely independent, totally unrelated entities: Big Bang Relic radiation (a prediction of Big Bang Theory) on one hand, and CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background, an observed radiation field) on the other. This blackbody linkage (which was a fraud) is now being very carefully skirted around – the way a furtive thief at night skirts around lighted places.

A QUESTION OF IDENTITY

Notice the clever working of the language: “This radiation, called the cosmic microwave background (CMB), …” This says that CMB is the name we have given to the Big Bang relic radiation. They are one and the same thing.

The identicality of the unrelated entities CMB radiation and Big Bang Relic radiation – which identification is the heart and soul of Big Bang – is now being taken as received truth. No scientific proof of the identicality is needed anymore. All you have to do is constantly intone:


You say potato, I say potahto…
CMB is Relic radiation.
Relic radiation is CMB.
Let’s call the whole Blackbody thing off.

So you can ask: If the identicality is self-evident now in 2015, why did they spend $400 million in the 1980s (COBE Satellite) to try to establish the identicality? What has changed about the Universe in 30 or so years?

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

This business of things beginning to “crystallize” in the mid-1960s is a Molière-esque farce. Not only Penzias and Wilson did not observe any blackbody, but that 3.5 K “crystallization” temperature they reported was also patently wrong. It was grossly miscalculated. The correct calculation would have given a temperature of no significance to Big Bang. So Penzias and Wilson – while observing CMB at a single frequency – in no way, shape or form did anything to crystallize Big Bang. And every following Big Bang satellite experiment solidly DISPROVED Big Bang. Three satellites in all.

So the thing for you to very clearly understand is that the issues here are not something of my making. They are 100% objective, real and fatal scientific miscarriages. Every time science told us something, the Big Bang cosmologists told us the opposite.

THEY, the Big Bang cosmologists themselves, said that CMB can be identified as relic radiation because the former has been observed to have the predicted signature Big Bang blackbody form. They gloried over this discovery. The blackbody form made Big Bang unquestionably correct, THEY said. They made their triumphal ramp walk on the world stage – swinging their cute butts in wide arcs. Then they hit the Big Bang dissidents hard over the head with this blackbody. Then they said: Dissidents, go die so we can continue with our fun and games. They had some “pretty harsh words” for my teacher who, it now turns out, was right all along. Let us not forget all these, folks!

OUTRUNNING THEIR OWN SCAM

THEY are now deep-sixing the blackbody because it has been exposed as a fraud, because they got found out. They are not accepting any responsibility for this, and they are offering no explanation or elaboration on this. With that blackbody-based identity gone, the identity of CMB and relic radiation is now by diktat, period. Jawohl, Herr Obersturmbannführer!

Why the hell are these people being allowed by the scientific establishment to get away with repeatedly and flagrantly perverting the course of science?! Why do they have a pass on accepting responsibility for this huge evil blackbody empire they had erected to prop up Big Bang? Why are they exempt from even the minimal standards of ethical conduct in science? How can these deniers of hard scientific evidence continue to operate unchecked?

The actual extent of this defrauding of the world is far worse: THEY know that the blackbody has been disproved and therefore CMB and Big Bang Relic radiation have been positively delinked.

THEIR EXPERIMENTERS HAVE REPEATEDLY PROVED THAT CMB IS NOT RELIC RADIATION – THAT THERE IS NO CONNECTION. THEY HAVE THEN DEEP-SIXED THIS EVIDENCE SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE WITH THEIR GIGANTIC FRAUD. THE SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISHMENT AND THE MEDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT FUNDING AGENCIES KEEP QUIET ABOUT THIS, AND LET THIS SCOURGE GO ON.

BIG BANG M.O.: SHAM AWAY, SCAM AWAY, DEFRAUD AWAY; IF YOU GET CAUGHT, WALK AWAY

Never in the history of science have so many cunning, conniving, scheming scientists enjoyed so much limelight and so much adoration for so long. The physics establishment is entirely to blame.

One gigantic Big Bang scam unfolded in real time during my watch: the BICEP2 botch up. You saw me nip this thing in the bud the very day the rolled out the discovery. Then you saw the gang try to cover it up for a year. They put a twist to it (galactic dust vs. primordial B-mode), others moved in and made a name as BICEP2 busters, never admitting the gross instrumental botch up. You saw them get a testimonial from a dishonest Planck Collaboration that the instrument was shipshape. Then, I think the private funding agencies (who, unlike the government agencies, value their own money) woke up, and put the squeeze on them. Then they went absolutely quiet.

If repeated exposing of scam science, sham science and fraud science conducted by these people cannot stop them, what will?

I ask you, what will?

This is the truth I have learned over the years of watching them: Big Bang cosmologists are not bad scientists. They are bad people operating in science.

LET’S GET CONCRETE: LET’S NAME SOME NAMES

Here is a list of people who made the decision to make this award and did the clever language-smithing. Take a good look at these – – these cheloveks, these leute – – who under their showy academic mantles are systematically corrupting your world all around you. When you gonna wake up?!

The Prize recipients are chosen by the Cosmology Selection Advisory Board. Its members are:

Andrew Fabian, University of Cambridge; Wendy Freedman, University of Chicago (Chair); Helge Kraghe, Niels Bohr Institute; Frans Pretorius, Princeton University; Sadanori Okamura, Hosei University; Subir Sarkar, University of Oxford; and Rashid Sunyaev, Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics. Owen Gingerich of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Martin Rees of the University of Cambridge also serve as special Cosmology advisors to the Foundation.

LORD HAVE MERCY!

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “GRUBER PRIZE CONTINUES TO PROMOTE BIG BANG COSMOLOGY FRAUD”

  1. ST Says:

    I have imagined a different version of how a universe could be formed. I’m curious why you would think a big-bang is not likely?
    A Big-cloud seems more likely to me. A crossing of light wave fronts to cause concentrated space-time [hydrogen] across vast regions of space. Like from that a very strong voice of light may cause to occur.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s