How a comparison of the two scam discoveries brings out the central scam. See more text below:
LIGO , LIGO gravitational wave, LIGO black hole merger, LIGO scam, LIGO smoking gun, LIGO MIT, LIGO Caltech, NSF, ligo first discovery, ligo second discovery, ligo fraud, ligo scam, ligo india
LIGO , LIGO gravitational wave, LIGO black hole merger, LIGO scam, LIGO smoking gun, LIGO MIT, LIGO Caltech, NSF, ligo first discovery, ligo second discovery, ligo fraud, ligo scam, ligo india
With the second discovery the LIGO scam was escalated. At the same time a clever plan was hatched: The new discovery would be promulgated in the media largely by new international players, and the original players would stay in the background. That way an image of robust science with international support base would be created.
Note that the LIGO second discovery requires not one but two scientific indulgences. They were desperate to “confirm” the first discovery and show that it was not a “fluke”. So they made the decision to administer to the critics the old one-two punch. First, this business about detecting macroscopic movement to the extent of 1/1000 the diameter of a proton. Second, uncovering and entire black body merger scenario buried in the noise hash. Both indulgences are used in a compounded way for the same discovery, one for the instrumental scam and the other for the digital trickery. You have to simultaneously accept as credible two independent steps that each strain the limit of credibility. Hash(ish) is the operative word. For that is what anyone who promotes this discovery uses. I don’t know who sells the Indulgencia Scientifico and what it costs, but I sure would like to have had a couple of these in my young days.
Tags: Covering up science fraud, Intellectual poseurs, LIGO gravitational waves, The Age of Fakery, When the nobles scam you
Leave a reply relevant to the above post.