Archive for the ‘bicep2 cmb’ Category

PHYSICS’S AUGEAN STABLES

July 7, 2017


In the Augean Stables of Greek mythology, the cattle lived and defecated for three decades. The stables were never cleaned. In the end, the animals were wallowing in their own excrement, accumulated way high. Hercules was commissioned to clean this up in just one day (The Fifth Labor of Hercules.)

The physics establishment has never cleaned its own mess: the Big Bang crap, the Penzias-Wilson discovery crap, the COBE Satellite discovery crap, the BICEP2 cover-up crap, the Hawking crap, the Witten crap, and now the LIGO discovery crap, …. No fault was ever admitted, no soul-searching was ever done, no retraction was ever made. All these dung heaps have accumulated. Physicists have never done any house-cleaning in the last six decades. They just wallow waist-deep in their own accumulated merd even as they engage in their happy talk. This is why they stink to mighty heaven.

Today’s mainstream physicists are living in their own Augean Stables. And I have been commissioned to clean this mess.


American Physical Society, APS, American Institute of Physics, AIP, European Physical Society, LIGO gravitational wave, Physical Review Letters, Penzias Wilson, Smoot Mather, BICEP2, Physics Today, Physics World, Stephen Hawking Big Bang, Edward Witten String Theory

American Physical Society, APS, American Institute of Physics, AIP, European Physical Society, LIGO gravitational wave, Physical Review Letters, Penzias Wilson, Smoot Mather, BICEP2, Physics Today, Physics World, Stephen Hawking Big Bang, Edward Witten String Theory

Advertisements

Steadfast European support of American physics fraud

May 22, 2017


Christophe Rossel, Christophe Rossel eps, Christophe Rossel eps president, Johann-Dietrich Wörner, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa director general, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, barry barish, barry barish ligo, cocconi prize, eps coconi prize, cobe satellite, planck satellite, ligo gravitational waves, bicep2, bicep2 cmb, esa planck, esa bicep2, esa ligo, european space agency, european physical society, eps prizes, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

Christophe Rossel, Christophe Rossel eps, Christophe Rossel eps president, Johann-Dietrich Wörner, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa director general, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, barry barish, barry barish ligo, cocconi prize, eps coconi prize, cobe satellite, planck satellite, ligo gravitational waves, bicep2, bicep2 cmb, esa planck, esa bicep2, esa ligo, european space agency, european physical society, eps prizes, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

EPS COCCONI PRIZE 2017
eps_cocconi_prize_2017

EPS COCCONI PRIZE 2017

PHYSICS PUBLISHING: Peer review or Pierre review?!

May 21, 2017


physical review letter, prl, american physical society, aps, pierre meystre, pierre meystre prl, pierre meystre physical review letters, pierre meystre editor, pierre meystre aps, pierre meystre arizona, american institute of physics, aip, bicep2, ligo gravitational waves, ligo science collaboration, ligo india, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nsf ligo, kavli foundation, france cordova nsf

physical review letter, prl, american physical society, aps, pierre meystre, pierre meystre prl, pierre meystre physical review letters, pierre meystre editor, pierre meystre aps, pierre meystre arizona, american institute of physics, aip, bicep2, ligo gravitational waves, ligo science collaboration, ligo india, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nsf ligo, kavli foundation, france cordova nsf

PHYSICS ESTABLISHMENT: The Princeton “Cleaner” Squad

May 18, 2017


David Spergel, David Spergel Princeton, David Spergel Princeton University, Paul Steinhardt, Paul Steinhardt Princeton, Paul Steinhardt Princeton University, BICEP2, BICEP2 B mode, Cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, inflation theory, big bang inflation, big bang black body, cosmic microwave background radiation, cmb

David Spergel, David Spergel Princeton, David Spergel Princeton University, Paul Steinhardt, Paul Steinhardt Princeton, Paul Steinhardt Princeton University, BICEP2, BICEP2 B mode, Cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, inflation theory, big bang inflation, big bang black body, cosmic microwave background radiation, cmb

ACADEMIC PRIVILEGE: A Stanford-MIT scamming axis

May 15, 2017

CHEEZEBORGER, CHEEZEBORGER …
THE LINDE-GUTH NOTHINGBURGER


Andrei Linde, Andrei Linde Stanford, Andrei Linde Stanford University, andrei linde bicep2, Alan Guth, Alan Guth MIT, BICEP2, multiverse, cosmological inflation, cosmic inflation, big bang inflation, cmb, cosmic microwave background radiation

Andrei Linde, Andrei Linde Stanford, Andrei Linde Stanford University, andrei linde bicep2, Alan Guth, Alan Guth MIT, BICEP2, multiverse, cosmological inflation, cosmic inflation, big bang inflation, cmb, cosmic microwave background radiation

THIS MULTIVERSE BACCHANALIA

May 11, 2017


Decline of civilizations is accompanied by rise of orgiastic bacchanalia among the privileged set. The tremendous activity around multiverse today is such a bacchanalia of the intellectual kind. In an ongoing debate on multiverse, the proponents have issued a letter signed by 33 prominent leaders of the physics establishment. I have no desire to lower myself into this sordid business except to point out how this entire enterprise rests on perpetuating a grand lie. Here is a key portion:

The remarkable fact is that, starting with the results of the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite in 1992, numerous experiments have confirmed that these predictions (along with several others too technical to discuss here) accurately describe our universe.

The entire multiverse enterprise rests on the identification at the core of the observed Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation as the theorized Big Bang relic blackbody radiation.

This identification is totally fraudulent. CMB has been conclusively proved to be NOT a blackbody radiation, sequentially by each one of the three satellites mentioned in this letter (COBE, WMAP, Planck). This proof came at the expense of billions of dollars from American and European taxpayers.

This proof – which essentially took away the punch bowl – was deep sixed so that the party could continue. The disproved false result that CMB is blackbody was perpetuated.

Therefore multiverse is not just a decadent bacchanalia; it is a total fraud. There is nothing here to debate.

Multiverse is beyond science fraud. It is a gigantic taxpayer fraud.

THE SIGNATORIES (asterisk comments added by me)::

Alan H. Guth #
David I. Kaiser
Andrei D. Linde #
Yasunori Nomura
Charles L. Bennett *+
J. Richard Bond
François Bouchet $
Sean Carroll
George Efstathiou $
Stephen Hawking *
Renata Kallosh
Eiichiro Komatsu
Lawrence Krauss *&
David H. Lyth
Juan Maldacena
John C. Mather *@
Hiranya Peiris
Malcolm Perry
Lisa Randall
Martin Rees
Misao Sasaki
Leonardo Senatore
Eva Silverstein
George F. Smoot III *@
Alexei Starobinsky #
Leonard Susskind
Michael S. Turner
Alexander Vilenkin
Steven Weinberg
Rainer Weiss *&
Frank Wilczek @
Edward Witten &
Matias Zaldarriaga


* Perpetrated or supported COBE Satellite fraud
# Financially benefited from BICEP2 fraud
+ Perpetrated WMAP Satellite spectrum cover up
$ Participated in Planck Satellite spectrum cover up
& Participated in or supported LIGO fraud
@ Nobel Prize for scam discovery

PHYSICS: Bibhas De rewrites history

February 27, 2017


scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nasa fraud, nsf fraud, ostp, ostp white house, director ostp, scientific adviser to president, science adviser to president, nobel prize physics, nobel prize in physics, berkeley nobel laureates, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, ligo gravitational wave, ligo discovery, ligo collaboration, lsc collaboration, ligo india, cosmic black body, big bang black body, big bang cosmology, bicep2, bicep2 telescope, accelerating universe
bibhas_de_investigates
scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nasa fraud, nsf fraud, ostp, ostp white house, director ostp, scientific adviser to president, science adviser to president, nobel prize physics, nobel prize in physics, berkeley nobel laureates, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, ligo gravitational wave, ligo discovery, ligo collaboration, lsc collaboration, ligo india, cosmic black body, big bang cosmology, bicep2, bicep2 telescope, accelerating universe

Q&A

Q: And just who the heck is Bibhas De to rewrite the history of physics?!

A: He is a student of a giant of physics who was a student of a giant of physics.

Q: OK. But where are the reports of his investigation?

A: Here and here. Also read through the posts in this blog.

LIGO: Neil deGrasse Tyson’s bizarre tirade

February 14, 2017


Neil deGrasse Tyson is a science-popularizing public figure with a large following. His fields generally are astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology. His following – it can be assumed – looks to him to give the correct view of things, and accepts that view in implicit trust.

In a recent Q&A session he was asked about LIGO. On that he launched on a bizarre rant. This in itself is of no interest here, but what he says proves a very important point. People of his ilk – the LIGO commentariat – are peddling absolute garbage science to the world. This is the post-truth world of LIGO: Maintaining a fraudulent discovery through total control of the news media, with “fake news” and authoritative tough-guy stance by a group of poseurs.

Read this, and then I will show that Tyson does not know whereof he speaks.


AL: Last year…they found a gravity wave. When you looked, it was the tiniest little blip, you wound up wondering is it real. Do you believe in the [LIGO] apparatus? (LIGO refers to a pair of experiments, one in Washington State and one in Louisiana, built to observe gravitational waves from astrophysical phenomena like colliding black holes.)

NDT: The word “belief” will never come out of my mouth. The instrument is highly sensitive. It can tell if there’s a car driving on a road a half of a mile away. So you have to ask yourself what kind of signal would colliding black holes leave. We know general relativity and can calculate what that signal would be: it goes like this. Woop! (Tyson draws a squiggle on a page). Has anyone seen this? No? Then all of the sudden you get it. Holy shit, this matches our model for a black hole. Excuse me, same apparatus 1500 miles away, did you get this as well? Yes you did! Did you get it at the same time? No, you got it a 30th of a second later. Einstein’s prediction is that gravity waves move at the speed of light, and that is the time delay of the speed of light between these two institutions! (Tyson is shouting now) So, you will have to tell me that there is some glitch that knows how to mimic what we calculate for two colliding black holes (Pounding fist on the table) and somehow figured out how to put the same glitch 1500 miles away, a 30th of a second delayed.

So we’re good to go. We’re on to the next problem.

AL: Okay. I just want reassurance.

NDT: No, it’s good! We have competent people thinking about this stuff. We’re not just making shit up.

OK, let us take his points one by one.

First, Tyson says LIGO is so sensitive that it picks up a car traveling far away. LIGO responding to a car far away or to snow falling on cedars nearby or whatever has absolutely nothing to do with the working principle of the LIGO instrument. These spurious signals are recorded because they cause something to go out of whack inside LIGO. And most anything that goes out of whack inside LIGO will produce a LIGO “whack” signal. This signal is not generated according to the LIGO principle of operation. This process does not test anything about the LIGO working principle.

Second, he says that the sequential arrival of the “discovery” signals is proof that it is a gravitational wave. End of discussion, he says. The sequential arrival can occur due to a number of reasons: High altitude geomagnetic disturbance, deep Earth seismic disturbance, etc. Even fluctuations in the DC bridge connecting the American Eastern and Western electric power grids have been suggested as a possible cause of this near-simultaneous observation of the same signal at the two stations. In fact, when an earlier discovery of gravitational wave was reported on the basis of such a simultaneity, Rainer Weiss himself shot this down, saying it was due to geomagnetic disturbance.

Third, Tyson says that the LIGO discovery should be accepted because it has been made by “competent” people. Similarly competent people also reported the COBE Satellite discovery and the BICEP2 discovery. Both were fraud science. LIGO leader Rainer Weiss was also the scientific leader of the COBE project.

PHYSICS AND PHYSICISTS AT THE THRESHOLD OF 2017

January 2, 2017

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

Should physics Ph.D. require mandatory course in Ethics?

August 16, 2016


I understand that Ethichs is taught today as a part of the curriculum in medical and business schools. Likewise, should a Ph. D. degree in physics (and in fact in all science and technology fields) require mandatory coursework in Ethics?

Medical practitioners take the Hippocratic Oath which goes back to an ancient Latin phrase:

Primum non nocere (First of all, do no harm)

Should all physics practitioners from here on likewise take the Ligonautic Oath

Primum non scammare (First of all, do no scam)

Considering the rampant, epidemic and endemic scamming within the physics establishment that has been going on for nearly half a century (with the young generations following suit), I think that this may not be such a bad idea. Just look at the thousand scamming Ligonauts with zero remorse and no accepting of responsibility! They certainly deserve the oath to be named after them.

In business schools, Ethics is taught by way of studying the great scams (Bernie Maddoff, Ken Lay etc.) Likewise, use the following textbooks to design an Ethics course for Physics: