Archive for the ‘NASA’s COBE Satellite fraud’ Category

LIGO: Neil deGrasse Tyson’s bizarre tirade

February 14, 2017


Neil deGrasse Tyson is a science-popularizing public figure with a large following. His fields generally are astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology. His following – it can be assumed – looks to him to give the correct view of things, and accepts that view in implicit trust.

In a recent Q&A session he was asked about LIGO. On that he launched on a bizarre rant. This in itself is of no interest here, but what he says proves a very important point. People of his ilk – the LIGO commentariat – are peddling absolute garbage science to the world. This is the post-truth world of LIGO: Maintaining a fraudulent discovery through total control of the news media, with “fake news” and authoritative tough-guy stance by a group of poseurs.

Read this, and then I will show that Tyson does not know whereof he speaks.


AL: Last year…they found a gravity wave. When you looked, it was the tiniest little blip, you wound up wondering is it real. Do you believe in the [LIGO] apparatus? (LIGO refers to a pair of experiments, one in Washington State and one in Louisiana, built to observe gravitational waves from astrophysical phenomena like colliding black holes.)

NDT: The word “belief” will never come out of my mouth. The instrument is highly sensitive. It can tell if there’s a car driving on a road a half of a mile away. So you have to ask yourself what kind of signal would colliding black holes leave. We know general relativity and can calculate what that signal would be: it goes like this. Woop! (Tyson draws a squiggle on a page). Has anyone seen this? No? Then all of the sudden you get it. Holy shit, this matches our model for a black hole. Excuse me, same apparatus 1500 miles away, did you get this as well? Yes you did! Did you get it at the same time? No, you got it a 30th of a second later. Einstein’s prediction is that gravity waves move at the speed of light, and that is the time delay of the speed of light between these two institutions! (Tyson is shouting now) So, you will have to tell me that there is some glitch that knows how to mimic what we calculate for two colliding black holes (Pounding fist on the table) and somehow figured out how to put the same glitch 1500 miles away, a 30th of a second delayed.

So we’re good to go. We’re on to the next problem.

AL: Okay. I just want reassurance.

NDT: No, it’s good! We have competent people thinking about this stuff. We’re not just making shit up.

OK, let us take his points one by one.

First, Tyson says LIGO is so sensitive that it picks up a car traveling far away. LIGO responding to a car far away or to snow falling on cedars nearby or whatever has absolutely nothing to do with the working principle of the LIGO instrument. These spurious signals are recorded because they cause something to go out of whack inside LIGO. And most anything that goes out of whack inside LIGO will produce a LIGO “whack” signal. This signal is not generated according to the LIGO principle of operation. This process does not test anything about the LIGO working principle.

Second, he says that the sequential arrival of the “discovery” signals is proof that it is a gravitational wave. End of discussion, he says. The sequential arrival can occur due to a number of reasons: High altitude geomagnetic disturbance, deep Earth seismic disturbance, etc. Even fluctuations in the DC bridge connecting the American Eastern and Western electric power grids have been suggested as a possible cause of this near-simultaneous observation of the same signal at the two stations. In fact, when an earlier discovery of gravitational wave was reported on the basis of such a simultaneity, Rainer Weiss himself shot this down, saying it was due to geomagnetic disturbance.

Third, Tyson says that the LIGO discovery should be accepted because it has been made by “competent” people. Similarly competent people also reported the COBE Satellite discovery and the BICEP2 discovery. Both were fraud science. LIGO leader Rainer Weiss was also the scientific leader of the COBE project.

PHYSICS AND PHYSICISTS AT THE THRESHOLD OF 2017

January 2, 2017

[Sorry, tectonic misspelled in the graphic!]

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

GLOBAL WARMING and GRAVITATIONAL WAVE: An important point

December 3, 2016

I am not a climate change denier or a global warming skeptic. I think the steps to combat man-made change are a good proactive idea anyway, whether or not that change is occurring alarmingly.

That said, there is one very important point the world needs to be told loud and clear. It is this: Scientific fraud on a gigantic collective scale, backed by the government and the media, can and does take place. Hundreds of scientists may participate, and thousands of scientists may rally round them. There can be 99.99% scientific consensus in favor of the fraud.

Hordes of corrupt intellectuals are systematically falsifying our scientific civilization for personal profit, to feed individual narcissism, and to get some type of jollies – some kind of ultimate in shooting up.

The following two books describe such rampant fraud being conducted by NASA and NSF even as you read this.

ASTRONOMY: A return on investment

August 2, 2016

1968

Portfolio name: Safeguard Astronomy
Portfolio market value: US$707.90
Invested in: Bibhas De

2015-2016

Portfolio name: Safeguard Astronomy
Portfolio market value*: US$3 bn
Invested in: Bibhas De


*= Monetary value of the damages mitigated

NSF’S GOLDEN AGE OF COSMOLOGY FUNDING

April 23, 2016

Golden Age of Cosmology, nsf, cobe satellite, bicep2, wmap, ligo
cosmology_today
Golden Age of Cosmology, nsf, cobe satellite, bicep2, wmap, ligo

“…WHEN THE CULTURAL ELITE BECAME A PARASITIC ELITE…”

April 22, 2016

.


.

Decline and Fall of the Scientific Civilization
influential_men
The Age of Fakery

LIGO scam and COBE fraud: In the same mind born

April 1, 2016

Rainer Weiss, MIT professor, LIGO and COBE Guru, and sure Nobel Prize bet for LIGO, conceived both the LIGO and COBE instruments. The general concepts for both were born in his mind.

COBE was the greatest science fraud perpetrated upon humanity. LIGO has now emerged to be a fraud. It is no less a fraud than COBE.

Here from Wikipedia:

(Rainer) Weiss brought two fields of fundamental physics research from birth to maturity:

characterization of the cosmic background radiation,and

interferometric gravitational wave observation.

He made pioneering measurements of the spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation, and then was co-founder and science advisor of the NASA COBE (microwave background) satellite. In 2006, with John C. Mather, he and the COBE team were received Gruber Prize in Cosmology.

Weiss also invented the interferometric gravitational wave detector, and co-founded the NSF LIGO (gravitational-wave detection) project.

And here – in a very recent interview – Weiss is accepting full responsibility for LIGO instrumentation:

THE KAVLI FOUNDATION: What does it feel like to have made this discovery? Rai, because you’re one of LIGO’s creators and someone who has pondered how to detect theses waves since the 1970s, let’s start with you.

RAI WEISS: You’re not going to like my answer—I feel like a monkey just jumped off my back! But the monkey’s not gone yet, he’s still walking along here on the sidewalk. We’ve got more to do. At least some of the guilty feelings that might have come from having dragged all these people along for decades hunting gravitational waves and maybe ruined their careers isn’t happening. So I am very pleased.

JTF LiNo: Limpopo Johnny’s Bulletin No. 2016-11

February 9, 2016

lindau nobel laureate meeting, lindau nobel, lindau nobel meeting, lindau nobel laureate meeting 2016, david gross nobel prize, george smoot nobel prize, brian schmidt nobel prize, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, nasa fraud, esa fraud, big bang taxpayer fraud
big bang cosmology fraud
lindau nobel laureate meeting, lindau nobel, lindau nobel meeting, lindau nobel laureate meeting 2016, david gross nobel prize, george smoot nobel prize, brian schmidt nobel prize, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, nasa fraud, esa fraud, big bang taxpayer fraud

PHYSICS SCAMMERS HEED THIS!

January 31, 2016

Though the following item refers to a non-physicist and though this refers to a hyphenated American, the circumstances of the criminal prosecution apply equally well to the All-American physics fraudsters. Legal precedents are being created!

Once in a court of law, you will stand completely naked of all your establishment power. Your protection racket will be of no use. You will face twelve good men and true who are also taxpaying citizens. Think about that!

Don’t forget that citizens can take you to civil court and seek to make you regurgitate their money! They can use cases such as below in their favor. And they can enter my book into the body of evidence. And if they call me as an expert witness, I will come with bells on.

QUOTE:

On Wednesday, —, became a rare academic to not just fall from grace but also be punished with time behind bars.

A federal judge sentenced him to more than four and half years in prison and ordered him to repay $7.2 million in grant funds his team received from the federal government using his falsified data.

Academic misconduct often doesn’t even result in researchers losing their jobs, and it is even rarer for criminal charges and prison time to result from one of these cases.

But the case and the scope of the fraud caught the eye of U.S. Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) who demanded to know why more had not been done to recover the millions spent by —- to fund the bogus research.

“This seems like a very light penalty for — who purposely tampered with a research trial and directly caused millions of taxpayer dollars to be wasted on fraudulent studies,” Grassley noted in a 2014 letter.

And with that, — became a cautionary tale. Federal prosecutors pursued criminal charges carrying penalties of up to five years in prison.

“Just because somebody has a PhD, just because someone’s involved in the scientific community, doesn’t mean they’re going to necessarily be treated differently than anyone else who’s committed a criminal offense,” Nicholas Kleinfeldt, U.S. attorney … told CNN.

… the case, now closed, clearly sends a warning signal to other potential perpetrators of academic fraud …

END OF QUOTE

Here is a timely reprise of an old graphic of mine.

JTF LiNo: Limpopo Johnny’s Bulletin No. 2016-5

January 10, 2016

lindau nobel laureate meeting, lindau nobel laureate meeting 2016, lindau nobel meeting, john mather nobel prize, john mather nasa, saul perlmutter nobel prize, saul perlmutter berkeley, brian schmidt nobel prize, brian schmidt anu, brian schmidt anu vice chancellor, nobel prize physics, saul perlmutter salary, brian schmidt salary, berkeley nobel laureates, big bang cosmology
lindau nobel laureate meeting
lindau nobel laureate meeting, lindau nobel laureate meeting 2016, lindau nobel meeting, john mather nobel prize, john mather nasa, saul perlmutter nobel prize, saul perlmutter berkeley, brian schmidt nobel prize, brian schmidt anu, brian schmidt anu vice chancellor, nobel prize physics, saul perlmutter salary, brian schmidt salary, berkeley nobel laureates, big bang cosmology