Robitaille rings the death knell of Big Bang

Professor Pierre-Marie Robitaille is on a tear! His YouTube Channel Sky Scholar is putting out a series of videos explaining to anyone interested the rubbish that is Big Bang Cosmology. As of this date he has some 23000 subscribers – and growing.

More importantly, one can assess the reception of his teachings by reading the copious comments that follow each presentation. You will get the impression that Big Bang people are widely seen as hoaxers and scammers. Professor Robitaille seems to command enormous respect and trust.

I, and others, have worked long hard years to awaken the scientific community to the dangers of letting organized scientific fraud run this rampant. We have not gained any ground. In 2019 the Nobel Prize for Physics was awarded to James Peebles of Princeton for lifetime achievement in Big Bang, a hard slap on the faces of all of us who tried to do right by science. Just today Princeton University published a tome by Peebles, intended to further entrench this fraud into the lore of science (see my previous post). Let’s face it: We are beat!

So, more power to Robitaille. If we cannot correct science within the scientific community, taking the battle to the world at large is the right thing to do.

Letting frauds screw around with science is the same as letting kids play around with a skydiver’s parachute. When time comes for its actual use ….

Why is NASA’s fraud Nobelist John Mather invincible?

(Recycling a couple of old graphics):

john mather nasa, cobe satellite, cmb, cosmic black body

Evil doctors – in fiction and in real life

Philip Howard Bucksbaum, Philip Howard Bucksbaum aps, megan donahue aas, Mel Sabella aapt, Steven Chu aaas, michael moloney aip, Jonathan Flint CBE, Marcia McNutt nas, royal swedish academy of sciences

Physics funding going forward

Here are some of my old graphics on this topic:

Will Dan put up or shut up?

.

Delving the roots of epidemic physics corruption worldwide

The culture of fraud in making grander and grander physics discoveries – which started decades ago – is epidemic today. Somebody needs to write a Walter Isaacson-sized tome on this subject. It will be a most valuable sourcebook for the posterity. But I am not going to write this book. So the project is open for the taking.

Many lines of gigantic physics frauds engulfing the world today – when traced backward in time – converge in Princeton. The asymptotic freedom fraud, the Big Bang fraud, the LIGO fraud – they all have historical roots in Princeton.
.

.
Hannes Alfven had it exactly right. He is the one who tried to transform cosmology into science. And yet, he is the one the Swedish Coffee Guy Ulf Danielsson of Uppsala University trashed to give the Nobel Prize to James Peebles of Princeton for doing that transformation. James Peebles is a fraud.
.
READ THE JOHN MADDOX PREDICTION ON BIG BANG IN 1989.
.

.

.
David Gross and Frank Wilczek never had any discovery. This fact can be understood by any scientist in any field. And yet, today they are ruling the discovery roost.
.

.

Decade-end science message for the world

.
kevin droegemeier ostp, anna ekström minister, karen andrews minister, k vijayraghavan psa, k n vyas dae, ashutosh sharma dst, lars heikensten nobel foundation, carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, dan larhammar uppsala university, Pontus Böckman VoF, Roger Falcone aps, Megan Donahue aas, michael moloney aip, thomas f rosenbaum caltech, christopher l eisgruber princeton, Lawrence Bacow harvard, l rafael reif mit, Janet Napolitano uc, france cordova nsf, anne kinney nsf, allison lerner nsf, scientific misconduct, science fraud,

.

.

Big Bang is pseudoscience

Big Bang : Physics = Homoeopathy : Medicine

.
james peebles nobel prize, dan larhammar uppsala, dan larhammar uppsala university, ulf danielsson uppsala, ulf danielsson uppsala university, cmb bharat, penzias wilson, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite
.
The following document had been available for four years when the Nobel Prize was given to James Peebles for Big Bang. This is why everyone should realize that the Physics Nobel Prize Committee has become totally reckless. There cannot have been any scientific deliberation of any kind. There is just an agenda. This is how the ludicrous prizes in 2017 and 2019 were possible.

Proof of transatlantic collusion in Big Bang fraud

Get a load of this!

They are trying to deep-six their crime (phenomenal discovery of cosmic black-body radiation) and to proceed with a laundered story. This story is that the microwave radiation on which they base everything is “thermal background radiation.” The problem here is that it is not. We know that between the Penzias-Wilson frequency regime and the Smoot-Mather frequency regime, there is a frequency region in which there is no background radiation (see Paris Herouni discovery below). So the microwave radiation observable has an unknown and irregular spectrum, with power levels perhaps orders of magnitude below the 2.7 K level.

It is NOT thermal radiation – not in any sense of physics.

This is why I am telling you repeatedly that this whole string of impressive Big Bang justification – CMB, anisotropy, inflation, power spectra, acoustic peaks, nucleosynthesis … – is compounded fraud. I would not listen to anything any of them says to convince you otherwise. The fraud is clear and provable in a court of law. It is also criminal fraud in US law because it has been conducted with government money.

The Nobel Prize to Peebles aids, abets and glorifies a crime against the US.

.

Peebles award is not Nobel Foundation’s private business

There was time a traveler simply walked into the airport building, and walked on to his plane. Security checks were not even known. All that changed. Those days will never come back again. What happened? Terrorism against populace.

There was a time science was science. If mistakes were found – by whomever – the community pitched in to set things right. Those days are gone. What happened? Institutionalized science fraud.

Folks, do not be like those German villagers with only a mild curiosity about the funny-smelling smoke coming out of the tall chimneys. The only difference is, it is happening now in the intellectual arena where inconvenient truth is being burned. It was Germans then. It is Swedes now. Does that make it acceptable?

.