Archive for the ‘NASA’s COBE Satellite fraud’ Category

Steadfast European support of American physics fraud

May 22, 2017


Christophe Rossel, Christophe Rossel eps, Christophe Rossel eps president, Johann-Dietrich Wörner, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa director general, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, barry barish, barry barish ligo, cocconi prize, eps coconi prize, cobe satellite, planck satellite, ligo gravitational waves, bicep2, bicep2 cmb, esa planck, esa bicep2, esa ligo, european space agency, european physical society, eps prizes, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

Christophe Rossel, Christophe Rossel eps, Christophe Rossel eps president, Johann-Dietrich Wörner, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa director general, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, barry barish, barry barish ligo, cocconi prize, eps coconi prize, cobe satellite, planck satellite, ligo gravitational waves, bicep2, bicep2 cmb, esa planck, esa bicep2, esa ligo, european space agency, european physical society, eps prizes, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

EPS COCCONI PRIZE 2017
eps_cocconi_prize_2017

EPS COCCONI PRIZE 2017

PHYSICS ESTABLISHMENT: The Princeton “Cleaner” Squad

May 18, 2017


David Spergel, David Spergel Princeton, David Spergel Princeton University, Paul Steinhardt, Paul Steinhardt Princeton, Paul Steinhardt Princeton University, BICEP2, BICEP2 B mode, Cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, inflation theory, big bang inflation, big bang black body, cosmic microwave background radiation, cmb

David Spergel, David Spergel Princeton, David Spergel Princeton University, Paul Steinhardt, Paul Steinhardt Princeton, Paul Steinhardt Princeton University, BICEP2, BICEP2 B mode, Cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, inflation theory, big bang inflation, big bang black body, cosmic microwave background radiation, cmb

THIS MULTIVERSE BACCHANALIA

May 11, 2017


Decline of civilizations is accompanied by rise of orgiastic bacchanalia among the privileged set. The tremendous activity around multiverse today is such a bacchanalia of the intellectual kind. In an ongoing debate on multiverse, the proponents have issued a letter signed by 33 prominent leaders of the physics establishment. I have no desire to lower myself into this sordid business except to point out how this entire enterprise rests on perpetuating a grand lie. Here is a key portion:

The remarkable fact is that, starting with the results of the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite in 1992, numerous experiments have confirmed that these predictions (along with several others too technical to discuss here) accurately describe our universe.

The entire multiverse enterprise rests on the identification at the core of the observed Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation as the theorized Big Bang relic blackbody radiation.

This identification is totally fraudulent. CMB has been conclusively proved to be NOT a blackbody radiation, sequentially by each one of the three satellites mentioned in this letter (COBE, WMAP, Planck). This proof came at the expense of billions of dollars from American and European taxpayers.

This proof – which essentially took away the punch bowl – was deep sixed so that the party could continue. The disproved false result that CMB is blackbody was perpetuated.

Therefore multiverse is not just a decadent bacchanalia; it is a total fraud. There is nothing here to debate.

Multiverse is beyond science fraud. It is a gigantic taxpayer fraud.

THE SIGNATORIES (asterisk comments added by me)::

Alan H. Guth #
David I. Kaiser
Andrei D. Linde #
Yasunori Nomura
Charles L. Bennett *+
J. Richard Bond
François Bouchet $
Sean Carroll
George Efstathiou $
Stephen Hawking *
Renata Kallosh
Eiichiro Komatsu
Lawrence Krauss *&
David H. Lyth
Juan Maldacena
John C. Mather *@
Hiranya Peiris
Malcolm Perry
Lisa Randall
Martin Rees
Misao Sasaki
Leonardo Senatore
Eva Silverstein
George F. Smoot III *@
Alexei Starobinsky #
Leonard Susskind
Michael S. Turner
Alexander Vilenkin
Steven Weinberg
Rainer Weiss *&
Frank Wilczek @
Edward Witten &
Matias Zaldarriaga


* Perpetrated or supported COBE Satellite fraud
# Financially benefited from BICEP2 fraud
+ Perpetrated WMAP Satellite spectrum cover up
$ Participated in Planck Satellite spectrum cover up
& Participated in or supported LIGO fraud
@ Nobel Prize for scam discovery

BOGUS PHYSICS IN WIKIPEDIA

April 28, 2017


wikipedia, dark energy, cosmic inflation, accelerating universe, ligo gravitational waves, ligo India, COBE satellite, cosmic blackbody radiation, cmb, big bang cosmology, bicep2, keck array, asymptotic freedom, gravitational wave observatory

wikipedia, dark energy, cosmic inflation, accelerating universe, ligo gravitational waves, ligo India, COBE satellite, cosmic blackbody radiation, cmb, big bang cosmology, bicep2, keck array, asymptotic freedom, gravitational wave observatory

How the ivy withers on the Ivory Towers (Academic corruption)

April 5, 2017

“If the teacher be corrupt, the world will be corrupt” – Persian proverb


Academic corruption today is real and consequential. It is also rampant. It has become a way of life. I give you a few examples of how grand discovery frauds are leveraged by the noble leaders of the academia in impressive language to lubricate the path of grander future frauds. Fraud begets bigger fraud. I am not presenting these to increase you general knowledge. At issue are your hard-earned money and your precious children and your troubled nation.

As you view these images, ponder the Latin proverb:

Corruptio optimi pessima.
(Corruption of the highest is the worst.)

L. Rafael Reif, LIGO fraud, nsf fraud

L. Rafael Reif, LIGO fraud, nsf fraud

Drew Gilpin Faust, BICEP2 fraud, nsf fraud

Drew Gilpin Faust, BICEP2 fraud, nsf fraud

Michelle Wheatly, COBE Satellite fraud, nasa fraud

Michelle Wheatly, COBE Satellite fraud, nasa fraud

PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE MARCH FOR SCIENCE: What’s wrong with this picture?

April 2, 2017

“Public needs to face down Trump’s ‘absurd’ anti-science policies and back researchers.” – Jane Goodall

There is going on in the media a tremendous comment storm on how President Donald Trump is single-handedly destroying science as we know it. He is ending the scientific civilization.

A great protest march by the scientists is being planned.

On the face of it, most everyone will side with the critics. After all, science is motherhood. Anyone who assails it does not deserve any support.

Now, first things first. I did not vote for Trump. I certainly do not feel an urge to defend him. But let me be fair. I am in a unique position to add the crucial missing dimension to this public debate – the only dimension that should be at issue now.

The issue is rampant academic corruption in science. Not corruption by one rogue individual, but organized corruption by collectives. This is a deeply, deeply disturbing phenomenon that has been cultivated by the scientific community over a period of decades.

To this I add the following: This has gone on unhindered so long because of tacit approval by the various groups responsible for dealing with this. These groups include all the Presidents past.

In fact, when I brought such a clear instance of a gigantic fraud to President Obama, whatever actions he took were designed to save the faces of the fraudsters – first and foremost. They circled the wagons. Public was never told how they had been screwed over royally. The corrupt science was allowed to stand before the world just so a few butts could be saved. Honestly, are these butts worth saving?! Shouldn’t these butts have been fired instead?

Former Congressman Rush Holt is now the scientific leader who is spearheading the charge against the Trump administration. He is one to talk! He has supported to the hilt NASA science fraud John Mather.


Rush Holt (second from left) poses happily with NASA science fraud great John Mather.

A politically very powerful learned society, American Physical Society, has strongly and sanctimoniously endorsed the march for science. This society has also been a strong and sanctimonious endorser of rampant science fraud over the decades. They also have adopted strong and sanctimonious policies to combat science fraud.

So personally, I see President Trump as the first and the only leader with the stones to say to the out-of-control scamming intellectuals in behalf of us hapless taxpayers: This far, and no further!

Somebody needs to tell the pampered, fattened and freeloading intellectuals to stop screwing the taxpayers over. And this somebody has to be a person who can speak the only language these corrupt intellectuals understand: The language of pocketbook.

A long-standing, institutionalized and ingrained culture of corruption is being clothed in noble attire, and the clueless public is being inducted into rooting for this greatly wronged group of selfless benefactors of humanity. At the same time, certain specific areas of concern raised (rightly or wrongly) in normal conduct of affairs of the state are being grossly exaggerated to an all out attack on science. The term anti-science (calling to mind perhaps the word antichrist) is then casually injected to inflame the masses. How diabolically clever is that?!

During the Cuban missile crisis, the philosopher Bertrand Russell wrote a long letter to President Kennedy urging the latter to stand down in the interest of world peace. In reply, the President wrote: I think your attention might well be directed to the burglars rather than those who have caught the burglars.

Before our burglars are given a single more taxpayer dollar, there needs to be full public reckoning of the charge in the following graphic. I don’t see how these “aggrieved” hombres dare even open their mouths – let alone hold protest marches – while this historic charge is pending and while science stands perverted by them and exploited by them for personal benefit. This planned march for science is hypocrisy raised to the umpteenth power.

Jane Goodall knows a lot about the ways of gorillas and chimps. The science at contention between the scientific community and the Trump administration concerns a whole host of hard disciplines: physics, chemistry, space science, meteorology, oceanography, climatology, earth sciences, solar-terrestrial relation, numerical modeling of complex systems, medicine, biology… and so on. So I am at a loss understanding what qualifies her to make the comment she did.

bibhas_de_investigates

LIGO: Neil deGrasse Tyson’s bizarre tirade

February 14, 2017


Neil deGrasse Tyson is a science-popularizing public figure with a large following. His fields generally are astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology. His following – it can be assumed – looks to him to give the correct view of things, and accepts that view in implicit trust.

In a recent Q&A session he was asked about LIGO. On that he launched on a bizarre rant. This in itself is of no interest here, but what he says proves a very important point. People of his ilk – the LIGO commentariat – are peddling absolute garbage science to the world. This is the post-truth world of LIGO: Maintaining a fraudulent discovery through total control of the news media, with “fake news” and authoritative tough-guy stance by a group of poseurs.

Read this, and then I will show that Tyson does not know whereof he speaks.


AL: Last year…they found a gravity wave. When you looked, it was the tiniest little blip, you wound up wondering is it real. Do you believe in the [LIGO] apparatus? (LIGO refers to a pair of experiments, one in Washington State and one in Louisiana, built to observe gravitational waves from astrophysical phenomena like colliding black holes.)

NDT: The word “belief” will never come out of my mouth. The instrument is highly sensitive. It can tell if there’s a car driving on a road a half of a mile away. So you have to ask yourself what kind of signal would colliding black holes leave. We know general relativity and can calculate what that signal would be: it goes like this. Woop! (Tyson draws a squiggle on a page). Has anyone seen this? No? Then all of the sudden you get it. Holy shit, this matches our model for a black hole. Excuse me, same apparatus 1500 miles away, did you get this as well? Yes you did! Did you get it at the same time? No, you got it a 30th of a second later. Einstein’s prediction is that gravity waves move at the speed of light, and that is the time delay of the speed of light between these two institutions! (Tyson is shouting now) So, you will have to tell me that there is some glitch that knows how to mimic what we calculate for two colliding black holes (Pounding fist on the table) and somehow figured out how to put the same glitch 1500 miles away, a 30th of a second delayed.

So we’re good to go. We’re on to the next problem.

AL: Okay. I just want reassurance.

NDT: No, it’s good! We have competent people thinking about this stuff. We’re not just making shit up.

OK, let us take his points one by one.

First, Tyson says LIGO is so sensitive that it picks up a car traveling far away. LIGO responding to a car far away or to snow falling on cedars nearby or whatever has absolutely nothing to do with the working principle of the LIGO instrument. These spurious signals are recorded because they cause something to go out of whack inside LIGO. And most anything that goes out of whack inside LIGO will produce a LIGO “whack” signal. This signal is not generated according to the LIGO principle of operation. This process does not test anything about the LIGO working principle.

Second, he says that the sequential arrival of the “discovery” signals is proof that it is a gravitational wave. End of discussion, he says. The sequential arrival can occur due to a number of reasons: High altitude geomagnetic disturbance, deep Earth seismic disturbance, etc. Even fluctuations in the DC bridge connecting the American Eastern and Western electric power grids have been suggested as a possible cause of this near-simultaneous observation of the same signal at the two stations. In fact, when an earlier discovery of gravitational wave was reported on the basis of such a simultaneity, Rainer Weiss himself shot this down, saying it was due to geomagnetic disturbance.

Third, Tyson says that the LIGO discovery should be accepted because it has been made by “competent” people. Similarly competent people also reported the COBE Satellite discovery and the BICEP2 discovery. Both were fraud science. LIGO leader Rainer Weiss was also the scientific leader of the COBE project.

PHYSICS AND PHYSICISTS AT THE THRESHOLD OF 2017

January 2, 2017

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

GLOBAL WARMING and GRAVITATIONAL WAVE: An important point

December 3, 2016

I am not a climate change denier or a global warming skeptic. I think the steps to combat man-made change are a good proactive idea anyway, whether or not that change is occurring alarmingly.

That said, there is one very important point the world needs to be told loud and clear. It is this: Scientific fraud on a gigantic collective scale, backed by the government and the media, can and does take place. Hundreds of scientists may participate, and thousands of scientists may rally round them. There can be 99.99% scientific consensus in favor of the fraud.

Hordes of corrupt intellectuals are systematically falsifying our scientific civilization for personal profit, to feed individual narcissism, and to get some type of jollies – some kind of ultimate in shooting up.

The following two books describe such rampant fraud being conducted by NASA and NSF even as you read this.

ASTRONOMY: A return on investment

August 2, 2016

1968

Portfolio name: Safeguard Astronomy
Portfolio market value: US$707.90
Invested in: Bibhas De

2015-2016

Portfolio name: Safeguard Astronomy
Portfolio market value*: US$3 bn
Invested in: Bibhas De


*= Monetary value of the damages mitigated