Archive for the ‘Nobel Physics discoveries disappearing’ Category

The Lindau Nobel Casebook it is here!

June 22, 2018

You can download this casebook here (pdf ~ 5.3 MB)

CASEBOOK OF BIBHAS DE:
THE COTILLION ON LAKE CONSTANCE
where world’s select young talent summer


lindau nobel laureate meetings, nobel foundation, nobel prize physics, carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, christina moberg kth, royal swedish academy of sciences

Advertisements

A Nobel Masterclass

March 4, 2018


In the legendary Penzias-Wilson discovery paper, no information was given about the polarization state of their antenna feed. From what information was available, I concluded that they were receiving linear polarization.

The cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) is unpolarized (randomly polarized.)

If Penzias and Wilson wanted to receive the total power from CMB, their antenna would have to have received this power in two orthogonal linear polarizations, which powers they would then have to add. If they had gone through this elaborate instrumental process, they surely had to describe this in the paper as the most crucial information pertaining to the discovery.

My inference: Penzias and Wilson were receiving unpolarized radiation with a linearly polarized antenna. They did not report this or any adjustments for this polarization mismatch.


carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, christina moberg kth, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, nobel foundation, arno penzias, robert r. wilson, penzias and wilson, robert dicke, robert dicke princeton, p. j. e. peebles, jim peebles, jim peebles princeton, nobel prize physics 1978, cmb, cosmic microwave background, cosmic black body, big bang relic radiation, cobe satellite, holmdel antenna, nobel museum, nobel prize lessons, nobel media

carl-henrik heldin nobel foundation, christina moberg kth, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, nobel foundation, arno penzias, robert r. wilson, penzias and wilson, robert dicke, robert dicke princeton, p. j. e. peebles, jim peebles, jim peebles princeton, nobel prize physics 1978, cmb, cosmic microwave background, cosmic black body, big bang relic radiation, cobe satellite, holmdel antenna, nobel prize lessons, nobel media

Trump and the intellectual hypocrites

February 12, 2018


Kenneth Kimmell, kenneth kimmell ucs, Union of Concerned Scientists; Kathleen Rest, kathleen rest ucs, Peter Frumhoff, peter frumhoff ucs, Andrew Rosenberg, andrew rosenberg ucs, rush holt, rush holt aaas, John Holdren, Neal Lane, neil degrasse tyson, Neil deGrasse Tyson hayden planetarium, ostp, ostp white house, ligo fraud, big bang fraud, nasa fraud, nsf fraud, france cordova nsf, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l. rafael reif mit, christopher l. eisgruber princeton, drew gilpin faust harvard

Kenneth Kimmell, kenneth kimmell ucs, Union of Concerned Scientists; Kathleen Rest, kathleen rest ucs, Peter Frumhoff, peter frumhoff ucs, Andrew Rosenberg, andrew rosenberg ucs, rush holt, rush holt aaas, John Holdren, Neal Lane, neil degrasse tyson, Neil deGrasse Tyson hayden planetarium, ostp, ostp white house, ligo fraud, big bang fraud, nasa fraud, nsf fraud, france cordova nsf, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l. rafael reif mit, christopher l. eisgruber princeton, drew gilpin faust harvard

An ongoing nobelization of physics

November 10, 2017


nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, royal swedish academy of sciences, nobel foundation, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, mit nobel laureates, caltech nobel laureates, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, physical review letters, pierre meystre, david reitze ligo, laura cadonati ligo, david shoemaker ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, royal swedish academy of sciences, nobel foundation, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, mit nobel laureates, caltech nobel laureates, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, physical review letters, pierre meystre, david reitze ligo, laura cadonati ligo, david shoemaker ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

LIGO: The billion-dollar boner (with a Nobel Prize)

October 27, 2017


ligo science collaboration, lsc collaboration, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, ligo gravitational wave, binary black hole merger, binary neutron star merger, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize in physics 2017, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, nsf ligo, france cordova nsf, Fudan-Zhongzhi Science Award, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, pierre meystre, physical review letters

ligo science collaboration, lsc collaboration, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, ligo gravitational wave, binary black hole merger, binary neutron star merger, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize in physics 2017, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, nsf ligo, france cordova nsf, Fudan-Zhongzhi Science Award, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, pierre meystre, physical review letters

SERIAL SCIENCE FRAUD AWARDED NOBEL PRIZE

October 3, 2017

.

.


nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, royal swedish academy of sciences, nobel foundation, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l. rafael reif mit

nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, royal swedish academy of sciences, nobel foundation, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l. rafael reif mit

Steadfast European support of American physics fraud

May 22, 2017


Christophe Rossel, Christophe Rossel eps, Christophe Rossel eps president, Johann-Dietrich Wörner, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa director general, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, barry barish, barry barish ligo, cocconi prize, eps coconi prize, cobe satellite, planck satellite, ligo gravitational waves, bicep2, bicep2 cmb, esa planck, esa bicep2, esa ligo, european space agency, european physical society, eps prizes, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

Christophe Rossel, Christophe Rossel eps, Christophe Rossel eps president, Johann-Dietrich Wörner, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa, Johann-Dietrich Wörner esa director general, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, barry barish, barry barish ligo, cocconi prize, eps coconi prize, cobe satellite, planck satellite, ligo gravitational waves, bicep2, bicep2 cmb, esa planck, esa bicep2, esa ligo, european space agency, european physical society, eps prizes, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

EPS COCCONI PRIZE 2017
eps_cocconi_prize_2017

EPS COCCONI PRIZE 2017

THIS ACCELERATING UNIVERSE WEIRDORAMA

November 7, 2016

Recently a group of scientists has claimed that the discovery (2011 Nobel Prize for physics) that the expansion of the universe is accelerating is not valid. Other scientists are opposing this new finding. The former group claims to have done better statistics with a larger sample base.

This is a totally superfluous exercise. It is first of all beating a dead horse. But worse yet, it is creating somehow the impression that may be the horse is actually not dead, and needs to be shot. And if instead of shooting the horse the scientists shoot themselves in the foot, the net impression that will remain is that the horse is alive.

The discovery was and is totally bogus for science (not statistics) reasons I explained here in this blog site back in 2011, and later in my book The Falsifiers of the Universe. To try to disprove that false discovery with new statistics is like raising holy hell to try to dissolve the USSR.

As I have said before, this scientific establishment has gone to seeds.

There is a Bengali proverb: What do idle folks do? They mix together wheat and chaff, and separate them again.

LORD HAVE MERCY!

JTF LiNo: Limpopo Johnny’s Bulletin No. 2016-11

February 9, 2016

lindau nobel laureate meeting, lindau nobel, lindau nobel meeting, lindau nobel laureate meeting 2016, david gross nobel prize, george smoot nobel prize, brian schmidt nobel prize, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, nasa fraud, esa fraud, big bang taxpayer fraud
big bang cosmology fraud
lindau nobel laureate meeting, lindau nobel, lindau nobel meeting, lindau nobel laureate meeting 2016, david gross nobel prize, george smoot nobel prize, brian schmidt nobel prize, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, nasa fraud, esa fraud, big bang taxpayer fraud

PHYSICS SCAMMERS HEED THIS!

January 31, 2016

Though the following item refers to a non-physicist and though this refers to a hyphenated American, the circumstances of the criminal prosecution apply equally well to the All-American physics fraudsters. Legal precedents are being created!

Once in a court of law, you will stand completely naked of all your establishment power. Your protection racket will be of no use. You will face twelve good men and true who are also taxpaying citizens. Think about that!

Don’t forget that citizens can take you to civil court and seek to make you regurgitate their money! They can use cases such as below in their favor. And they can enter my book into the body of evidence. And if they call me as an expert witness, I will come with bells on.

QUOTE:

On Wednesday, —, became a rare academic to not just fall from grace but also be punished with time behind bars.

A federal judge sentenced him to more than four and half years in prison and ordered him to repay $7.2 million in grant funds his team received from the federal government using his falsified data.

Academic misconduct often doesn’t even result in researchers losing their jobs, and it is even rarer for criminal charges and prison time to result from one of these cases.

But the case and the scope of the fraud caught the eye of U.S. Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) who demanded to know why more had not been done to recover the millions spent by —- to fund the bogus research.

“This seems like a very light penalty for — who purposely tampered with a research trial and directly caused millions of taxpayer dollars to be wasted on fraudulent studies,” Grassley noted in a 2014 letter.

And with that, — became a cautionary tale. Federal prosecutors pursued criminal charges carrying penalties of up to five years in prison.

“Just because somebody has a PhD, just because someone’s involved in the scientific community, doesn’t mean they’re going to necessarily be treated differently than anyone else who’s committed a criminal offense,” Nicholas Kleinfeldt, U.S. attorney … told CNN.

… the case, now closed, clearly sends a warning signal to other potential perpetrators of academic fraud …

END OF QUOTE

Here is a timely reprise of an old graphic of mine.