Posts Tagged ‘Physics and the media’

LET PLANCK DO RIGHT BY THE WORLD

June 30, 2014

Things are hotting up. This is what will happen in a conference in Valencia, Spain later this week:

Another issue of particular interest is the results of the BICEP2 experiment, which according to recent announcement, establish some primary evidence of the cosmic inflation process that occurred in the first moments of the universe after the Big Bang. “A presentation and discussion of the results will be held as well as the confirmation or contestation that should be provided by the European satellite Planck. This issue is to be one of the hot moments of the Conference”, Fuster states.

Another report has it that a wood-framed glass case has been set up in front of Alan Guth’s MIT office to hold the forthcoming Nobel Diploma:

“It” is not just any prize but one thing in particular: a citation for the Nobel Prize in physics. Even since his remarkable work analyzing the gravitational ripples after the big bang, Guth’s perhaps inevitable acceptance of a Swedish-accented phone call from the Nobel committee is now the talk of the physics world.

When Planck issued its main results in 2013, no one asked them about corroborating the Nobel prizewinning COBE Satellite discovery of the 2.7 degree K cosmic blackbody spectrum, and the Planck team never said anything. They knew there was hide nor hair of this blackbody in the sky – but they kept mum. Faces were saved and science was sacrificed.

Now bicep2 is being readied for the next round of Big Bang Nobel Prizes. The first necessary step towards this – the publication of the discovery in a refereed journal – has already been accomplished. The dust issue will blow over (It was planned that way!). So the only other thing that is necessary now is for Planck to keep mum on bicep2 instrumental botch up. That will clear the way to filling Guth’s glass case.

Believe me, the Planck people are smart cookies, and if anyone within the establisahment has figured out that bicep2 was a scandalous instrumental botch up, the Planck people have. In fact, I would go so far as to surmise that they have known this from long before I ever came on the scene.

Since the Nobelgivers will not read Internet blog sites, they will never know that there were any instrumental issues in absence of any indications from Planck. Everything will be shipshape for the award to proceed.

(Have you been enjoying as much as I have this jockeying for position among the potential Inflation Nobel candidates? Kovac and Guth have the most campaign clout going for them!)

Don’t be COBEd by Planck yet once again, World! Don’t let them biceptwo you too. Don’t let them equivocate. Remember this:

planck satellite, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 cmb, bicep2 telescope, jean-jacques dordain esa, galactic dust, b-mode polarization, cosmic inflation, gravitational wave, john kovac harvard, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli

planck satellite, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 cmb, bicep2 telescope, jean-jacques dordain esa, galactic dust, b-mode polarization, cosmic inflation, gravitational wave, john kovac harvard, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli

Advertisements

BICEP2 DUSTOLOGY: The Elis lean in

June 13, 2014

Folks, unfortunately there is no room in this graphic to invoke the Lord, but He should have been!

Time and time and time again, the Big Bang Cosmologists have committed the greatest scientific misconduct, and simply walked away from it without ever accepting any responsibility.

Read the following, and then ponder on the value of the authoritative posturing of these academics and their ilk. It is their scientific field and they are the insiders. They are in the best position to know and understand what is going on on the inside. So why are they so confidently broadcasting to the masses things that are not so?

The answer of course is simple: Academic chicanery has taken the place of what we used know as academic integrity.

megan urry yale university, priyamvada natarajan yale university, yale astronomy department, bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 planck satellite, bicep2 dust, b-mode polarization, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck, bicep2 kavli, keck foundation, kavli foundation, big bang cosmology inflation, big bang cosmology fraud, scientific misconduct

megan urry yale university, priyamvada natarajan yale university, yale astronomy department, bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 planck satellite, bicep2 dust, b-mode polarization, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck, bicep2 kavli, keck foundation, kavli foundation, big bang cosmology inflation, big bang cosmology fraud, scientific misconduct

THE BIG BANG SCOURGE: Why it must be stopped now

June 11, 2014

John kovac Harvard, chao-lin kuo Stanford, jamie bock Caltech, clem pryke Minnesota, David spergel Princeton, Raphael flauger ias, subir sarkar oxford, megan urry yale, Lawrence krauss Arizona, paul Steinhardt Princeton, Uroš Seljak berkeley, Michael Mortonson berkeley brian koberlein rit, amber miller Columbia, Physical Review Letters

John kovac Harvard, chao-lin kuo Stanford, jamie bock Caltech, clem pryke Minnesota, David spergel Princeton, Raphael flauger ias, subir sarkar oxford, megan urry yale, Lawrence krauss Arizona, paul Steinhardt Princeton, Uroš Seljak berkeley, Michael Mortonson berkeley brian koberlein rit, amber miller Columbia, Physical Review Letters

Big Bang Cosmology, NASA Administrator Charles F. Bolden, NASA Inspector General Paul K. Martin, NSF Director Cora B. Marrett, NSF Director Nominee France A. Córdova, NSF Inspector General Allison Lerner, OSTP Director John P. Holdren, Smithsonian Institution Director Cristián Samper, TIME Magazine managing editor Richard Stengel, scientific american editor-in-chief Mariette DiChristina, National Geographic CEO Gary E. Knell, Keck Foundation, Kavli Foundation, science fraud, scientific misconduct

Big Bang Cosmology, NASA Administrator Charles F. Bolden, NASA Inspector General Paul K. Martin, NSF Director Cora B. Marrett, NSF Director Nominee France A. Córdova, NSF Inspector General Allison Lerner, OSTP Director John P. Holdren, Smithsonian Institution Director Cristián Samper, TIME Magazine managing editor Richard Stengel, scientific american editor-in-chief Mariette DiChristina, National Geographic CEO Gary E. Knell, Keck Foundation, Kavli Foundation, science fraud, scientific misconduct

BICEP2: OK, let me frame the question

May 27, 2014

BICEP2 A TOTAL INSTRUMENTAL BOTCH UP

bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys, michael turner kicp kavli chicago, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, big bang cosmology inflation theory, big bang theory gravitational waves, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli foundation

bicep2 telescope, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys, michael turner kicp kavli chicago, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, big bang cosmology inflation theory, big bang theory gravitational waves, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli foundation

Raphael Flauger ias Princeton, Subir Sarkar Oxford, David Spergel Princeton, Brian Koberlein Rochester Institute of Technology, john kovac harvard, bicep2 foreground background polarization galactic dust b-mode polarization, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys
.
INTELLECTUAL POSEURS!

The charade that is being carefully maintained that the bicep2 discovery is going through a normal, healthily combative evaluation process is intended to hide the fact that this discovery is a total concoction. It is as fake as John Mather’s blackbody. There is absolutely nothing to DISCUSS or to EVALUATE. There are no Ifs, Ands or Buts. There is no “If confirmed ….”.

Those who are discussing and evaluating are thereby legitimizing a scam discovery, and prolonging its life. They are a witting party to the scam. They are engaged in exactly the same “process” that the Mather-backers engaged in for seven years, trying to protect that fraudster.

And Planck Satellite has as much to do with confirming bicep2 results as it has to do with confirming Stephen Hawking’s World Cup prediction.

Has it ever occurred to anyone why, when the entire issue with bicep2 is engineering, the theoreticians are noisily going on and on and there is not a shred of discussion on the instrumentation and the measurement?

OK, forget about me. Has anyone even noticed that ESA has pointed to “significant question marks” with bicep2 measurements? Not foreground/background polarization etc, but actual instrumental measurement. Coming from the normally low key and tight-lipped organization that ESA is, this has to be a very well-considered position. And ESA has top flight engineers. If anyone knows how to properly design stuff to properly measure things in space, they do.

This bicep2 gig has never advanced to the point where theoreticians would have anything to contribute. The bicep2 polarizations are instrumental artifacts. The theoreticians simply took over a botched up experiment and started piling their nonsense on it, thus burying the real issues.

It is like a group of aficionados in a modern art museum conducting a learned and lofty analysis on a starkly red-colored exhibit, until the custodian comes along and tells them: It’s just the fire extinguisher.

There is something VERY WRONG with this particular scientific establishment! They are using the cloak of academic nobility to scam the hardworking, taxpaying American public.

Isn’t it past time someone in the government started to look out for that little guy called the American taxpayer vis-a-vis the Big Bang Cosmologists?!

If an investigation is conducted using an outside-establishment engineering organization that the establishment can neither control nor “get to”, this fancy schmancy hightech experiment will be exposed as the Keystone Kops job that it really is.

That is what I think happened to John Mather, leading to the permanent capping of his job at the pre-Nobel Prize level. It was a US Government action. It can happen again.

.

Raphael Flauger ias Princeton, Subir Sarkar Oxford, David Spergel Princeton, Brian Koberlein, Rochester Institute of Technology, john kovac harvard, bicep2 foreground background polarization galactic dust b-mode polarization, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys

Raphael Flauger ias Princeton, Subir Sarkar Oxford, David Spergel Princeton, Brian Koberlein Rochester Institute of Technology, john kovac harvard, bicep2 foreground background polarization galactic dust b-mode polarization, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 flash boys

PLANCK SATELLITE vs BICEP2 TELESCOPE: Lemme ‘splain!

May 14, 2014

There is a statement issued within the last day or so from the bicep2 camp that they are standing by their discovery. So let us see what more I can do here.

The controversy that has been hotting up for sometime about the bicep2 discovery being in question because of a foreground-background issue is totally irrelevant. This seemingly conventional scientific controversy helps hide the real issue of mistakes and cover ups. There is one and only one issue: Bicep2 is an instrumental botch up.


.

IF THE TELESCOPE IS SPUN,
THE TURTLE’LL TURN!

bicep2 telescope, planck satellite, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, michael turner kicp chicago, big bang cosmology inflation theory, big bang theory gravitational waves, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli foundation, andrei linde stanford, alan guth mit, b-mode polarization
planck-vs-bicep2
bicep2 telescope, planck satellite, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, michael turner kicp chicago, big bang cosmology inflation theory, big bang theory gravitational waves, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli foundation, andrei linde stanford, alan guth mit, b-mode polarization
.

“WE ARE VERY CAREFUL SCIENTISTS.”
bicep2 telescope discovery, John Kovac harvard, Chao-lin Kuo Stanford, Jamie Bock CalTech, Clem Pryke Minnesota
bicep2-discovery
bicep2 telescope discovery, John Kovac harvard, Chao-lin Kuo Stanford, Jamie Bock CalTech, Clem Pryke Minnesota
.

THE AMAZING UNIVERSE TWIRLER
bicep2 telescope, planck satellite, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, michael turner kicp chicago, big bang cosmology inflation theory, big bang theory gravitational waves, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli foundation, andrei linde stanford, alan guth mit, b-mode polarization
bicep2-telescope-south-pole
bicep2 telescope, planck satellite, john kovac harvard, chao-lin kuo stanford, jamie bock caltech, clem pryke minnesota, michael turner kicp chicago, big bang cosmology inflation theory, big bang theory gravitational waves, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli foundation, andrei linde stanford, alan guth mit, b-mode polarization

BICEP2 POST MORTEM: Essential development never done

May 5, 2014

bicep2 telescope south pole, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck, bicep2 kavli, bicep2 Harvard University, bicep2 Stanford, bicep2 KICP University of Chicago, bicep2 CalTech, bicep2 JPL, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, discovery of gravitational waves, discovery of cosmic inflation

bicep2 telescope south pole, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck, bicep2 kavli, bicep2 Harvard University, bicep2 Stanford, bicep2 KICP University of Chicago, bicep2 CalTech, bicep2 JPL, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, discovery of gravitational waves, discovery of cosmic inflation

bicep2 telescope south pole, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck, bicep2 kavli, bicep2 Harvard University, bicep2 Stanford, bicep2 KICP University of Chicago, bicep2 CalTech, bicep2 JPL, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, discovery of gravitational waves, discovery of cosmic inflation

bicep2 telescope south pole, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 nsf-oig, bicep2 keck, bicep2 kavli, bicep2 Harvard University, bicep2 Stanford, bicep2 KICP University of Chicago, bicep2 CalTech, bicep2 JPL, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, discovery of gravitational waves, discovery of cosmic inflation

ALFRED AND HIS ALBATROSSES: Decline and Fall of the Nobel Prize for Physics

October 15, 2013

We hear a lot about deserving candidates not getting the Physics Nobel Prize.
That is a human story.
We do not hear at all about Physics Nobel Prizes given out systematically for patently bogus discoveries.
That is a story of the civilization. (Think Roman Civilization).

[Click to enlarge]
Nobel Prize, Nobel Prize for Physics, Alfred Nobel, Nobel Foundation, Nobel Prize Committee for Physocs, Big Bang Cosmology Nobel Laureates, George Smoot and John Mather; Saul Perlmutter Brian Schmidt and Adam Riess, Frank Wilczek David Politzer and David Gross, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences


Nobel Prize, Nobel Prize for Physics, Alfred Nobel, Nobel Foundation, Nobel Prize Committee for Physocs, Big Bang Cosmology Nobel Laureates, George Smoot and John Mather; Saul Permutter Brian Schmidt and Adam Riess, Frank Wilczek David Politzer and David Gross, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

bogus_physics_nobel_prizes
Physics Nobel Prizes for patently bogus discoveries – issued again and again and again – are a sure sign that the scientific civilization is in decline.

[CLICK TO ENLARGE]
NOBEL PRIZE HISTORY: A tainted roster of history

LIST OF NOBEL PRIZE FOR PHYSICS:
NOBEL PRIZE HISTORY: A tainted roster of history

PERIMETER DEFENSES FOR NASA SCIENCE FRAUD JOHN MATHER

May 23, 2013

[Click to enlarge]
John Mather Nobel Laureate NASA GSFC science fraud, Smithsonian Associates Future is Here Conference, National Geographic Big Idea, TIME Magazine Most Influential Man in Space, US Congress, James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scientific misconduct, decline and fall of the American civilization

John Mather Nobel Laureate NASA GSFC science fraud, Smithsonian Associates Future is Here Conference, National Geographic Big Idea, TIME Magazine Most Influential Man in Space, US Congress, James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scientific misconduct, decline and fall of the American civilization

REFERENCES:

How powerful Democratic members of the US Congress have repeatedly expressed solidarity with science fraud John Mather

How the James Webb Space Telescope crew have used the platform to promote the individual Mather

How National Geographic feted John Mather (VIDEO)

How TIME Magazine feted John Mather

How the Smithsonian Institution fetes Mather

John C. Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud/scientific misconduct

John C. Mather (left) NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud was never publicly acknowledged in six years since it was exposed. There is no public mention that there was anything the matter with his discovery. His fraud is being handled by various parties concerned by slinking away from his “discovery”. Even as this surreptitious back-pedaling is happening, he is being enabled by people in very high places to whoop it up as a high profile celebrity and a NASA icon, and to inspire young people with his own example.
And now about the luckless ones whose backs no one has.
The frauds of Dr. Anil Potti, Dr. Diapk Das and Dr. Bharat Aggarwal (right, top to bottom) – all Indian-Americans, in unconnected research programs – have all been subjected very promptly and with great urgency to zealous investigation and media reporting, as they should be.
Their careers have pretty much ended.

IN CONCLUSION:

The true intent of the US policy on science fraud/scientific misconduct/scientific integrity clarified

QUO VADIS AMERICAN PHYSICIST?

May 16, 2013

Summer is nearly upon us. Soon it will be announced that two young people have been branded with the John Mather iron: AIP Mather Policy Interns. In July, several more young people will become branded: John Mather Nobel Scholars.

It is time to take a good look at those who stick the branding iron in glowing ember, those who pin down the cattle, and those who position the red hot iron and …

[Click to enlarge]
John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud, Big Bang Cosmology, Louis J. Lanzerotti, H. Frederick Dylla, C. Megan Urry, Lawrence Krauss, Richard Conn Henry, AIP Mather Policy Intern, John Mather Nobel Scholar

John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud, Big Bang Cosmology, Louis J. Lanzerotti, H. Frederick Dylla, C. Megan Urry, Lawrence Krauss, Richard Conn Henry, AIP Mather Policy Intern, John Mather Nobel Scholar

[Click to enlarge]
Science fraud physics scientific misconduct, Big Bang Cosmology Theory CMB Relic Radiation Blackbody Spectrum, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate, University of California Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Victor Ninov, Jan Hendrik Schon

Science fraud physics scientific misconduct, Big Bang Cosmology Theory CMB Relic Radiation Blackbody Spectrum, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate, University of California Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Victor Ninov, Jan Hendrik Schon

[Click to enlarge]
Nobel Prize for Physics Big Bang Cosmology,
Penzias & Wilson; Smoot & Mather: Perlmutter, Schmidt and Riess

Nobel Prize for Physics Big Bang Cosmology,
Penzias & Wilson; Smoot & Mather: Perlmutter, Schmidt and Riess

Lord have mercy on the young of America!

BIG BANG RELIC RADIATION: Then & Now

May 1, 2013

BIG BANG TRENDING – BUT WHICH WAY?

[Click to enlarge]
Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation

Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation

THE BIG BANG THEORY BLACKBODY SPECTRUM:

The success of Big Bang Cosmology rests 100.00% on the discovery of the Cosmic Blackbody Spectrum. This is what the Big Bang Cosmologists themselves have strongly averred. It was with the Blackbody that they shut out all alternative cosmologies and all the critics, and beat up some of them badly.

But there is an attempt today to cite a laundry list of other things that support Big Bang. The idea is to continue Big Bang Cosmology without the Blackbody, now that that scam has been laid bare. Do not fall for this deception. Do not let Big Bang Cosmologists outrun their scam! Do not let these hombres weasel out of this one!

The strangest thing! After plastering the world with the glory of the Big Bang Blackbody all these years, after installing it in museums and in monuments and in children’s textbooks, after garnering all these prizes and accolades and limelight, after conducting such brisk commerce with glossy books and dvds, suddenly everyone has clammed up on it.

The scientific establishment does not ask any questions about this. The scientific media does not ask any questions about this. Why?

Are there parallels between Big Bang Blackbody and Iraqi WMD?

When a science fraud is very fully exposed, what do they do? They simply deep-six the fraudulent discovery. A NATO style secrecy is imposed around it.

Not only that. In concert with the cover up plan, they are relaunching their great hero, science fraud John Mather this summer through a platform as high as the Smithsonian Institutions!

The greatest science fraud in history has been saved by the greatest cover up plan in history – engaged in by a coalition of willing nations.

[Click to enlarge]
Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation
Cover Up of science fraud, scientific misconduct NASA Satellite fraud
Physics Nobel Prize for Physics 1978, 2006, 2011

Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation
Cover Up of science fraud, scientific misconduct NASA Satellite fraud
Physics Nobel Prize for Physics 1978, 2006, 2011

Because there has been no official retraction of the Blackbody from any quarters, all the peripheral pundits today are going like energizer bunnies, telling the world in most authoritative language that Big Bang Cosmology has been proved beyond the shadow of a doubt. The truth is that it is the worst kind of chicanery that has ever been perpetrated under the guise of science.