Posts Tagged ‘Planck Satellite vs COBE Satellite’

BIG BANG EXPERIMENTERS: Sittin’ on the dock of the bay….

December 26, 2014

BIG BANG EXPERIMENTERS: They are …

… sittin’ on the dock of the bay
Wastin’ time …
(and your money!)

LORD HAVE MERCY!

Cosmic blackbody, Big Bang Cosmology, NSF OIG, BICEP2, BICEP3, POLARBEAR, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, Planck Satellite, EBEX Telescope, Keck Array, B-Mode polarization

Cosmic blackbody, Big Bang Cosmology, NSF OIG, BICEP2, BICEP3, POLARBEAR, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, Planck Satellite, EBEX Telescope, Keck Array, B-Mode polarization

IMPORTANT NOTE: WHY DO THEY NOT CONFIRM COBE BLACKBODY?

You can see from above diagram that the frequencies chosen with great deliberation for the WMAP and the Planck satellites (which are far more accurate than COBE) would together confirm the rising edge, the falling edge and the peak of the all-important COBE Blackbody Spectrum extremely well.

If this confirmation happened, why do they not tell us?

If this confirmation did not happen, why do they not tell us?

Does this make any sense to anyone at all?

When they are reapeatedly telling you how one experiment after another is impressively confirming the CMB Power Spectrum, CMB skymap etc, why this strange silence on the confirmation of the CMB Blackbody Spectrum?

When they are so concerned with confirming the B-Mode swirls, why this strange silence on confirming the Blackbody Spectrum?

Confirmation, confirmation, confirmation – that has been the name of the Big Bang Game.

Why this inexplicable reluctance in presenting the confirmation of what is the very core of everything they do?

Why does not the physics establishment ask this most logical and most obvious question about the blackbody confirmation?

Why do not the science reporters ask this question?

Why do not the funding agencies, the Decadal Survey, the Proposal Review Panels and the refereed journal referees ask this question?

The answer: COBE Blackbody was solidly disproved by WMAP and Planck. There is nothing in the sky even remotely approaching this blackbody. But to come out and say so would spell the end of the line for this diabolic, tax money-guzzling, well-organized and far-flung Scam Syndicate.

This is how they were able to progressively advance from the Blackbody Taxpayer Fraud Scam to the CMB Power Spectrum Taxpayer Fraud Scam to the B-Mode Swirl Taxpayer Fraud Scam.

The physics establishment and the science media are aiding and abetting. May be they are doing it willingly. May be they hope to become Big Bang’s made men. May be they are afraid of Big Bang’s Luca Brasi.

Another subtle deception that many may not have noticed is this: They started calling the statistical distribution of patchy structures in the sky the CMB Power Spectrum! This is not a natural name. It has been cleverly devised to confuse the world into thinking that they are here talking of clinching the real CMB Power Spectrum (= CMB intensity spectrum) real good! This is yet another mass psychology technique they are applying.

But perhaps the most important practical issue is this – Why do the government funding agencies remain silent on this overt and blatant taxpayer fraud?

Advertisements

BIG BANG: The Second CMB Deception

December 5, 2014

Folks, as I am revising my Big Bang Fraud Book to get it ready for publication as a regular book, I realize that I have not covered the issue of the Second CMB Deception. So here it is in a nutshell:

Big Bang Cosmology, Inflation Theory, CMB Power Spectrum, CMB Spectrum, Relic Radiation, Blackbody, Planck Satellite, WMAP Satellite

Big Bang Cosmology, Inflation Theory, CMB Power Spectrum, CMB Spectrum, Relic Radiation, Blackbody, Planck Satellite, WMAP Satellite

SIMPLE QUESTION FOR THE PLANCK2014 MEETING

November 28, 2014

Jean-Jacques Dordain, esa, Jan Tauber, esa, planck satellite, planck collaboration, Planck CMB Spectrum, Big Bang Blackbody Relic Radiation, Big Bang Cosmology

Jean-Jacques Dordain, esa, Jan Tauber, esa, planck satellite, planck collaboration, Planck CMB Spectrum, Big Bang Blackbody Relic Radiation, Big Bang Cosmology

UPDATE ON 12/04/2014:

As recently as today, two currently active leaders of the field – both currently receiving government money – are averring that:

… the CMB has a blackbody spectrum that peaks near a frequency ν of 160 GHz …

Is this true?
Where is the Planck CMB Spectrum?
Where is the WMAP CMB Spectrum?

BICEP2-PLANCK: The mother of all collaborations!

October 2, 2014

BICEP2 Telescope, Planck Satellite

BICEP2 Telescope, Planck Satellite

10 SKELETONS IN THE BIG BANG CLOSET

August 15, 2014


Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Theory, Kavli Prize 2014, Cosmological Inflation Theory, Bicep2 discovery, Bicep2 South Pole, Bicep2 galactic dust, Cosmological redshift, Hubble redshift, expanding universe, Alan Guth MIT Kavli Prize, Andrei Linde Stanford Kavli Prize, John Kovac Harvard Bicep2, Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford Bicep2, Jamie BocK JPL Bicep2, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, Planck Satellite, Big Bang Blackbody Spectrum, CMB Spectrum, Cosmic Background Radiation CMB, Kavli Foundation, Keck Foundation, NSF
big-bang-cosmology-and-inflation-theory
Big Bang Cosmology, Big Bang Theory, Kavli Prize 2014, Cosmological Inflation Theory, Bicep2 discovery, Bicep2 South Pole, Bicep2 galactic dust, Cosmological redshift, Hubble redshift, expanding universe, Alan Guth MIT Kavli Prize, Andrei Linde Stanford Kavli Prize, John Kovac Harvard Bicep2, Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford Bicep2, Jamie BocK JPL Bicep2, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, Planck Satellite, Big Bang Blackbody Spectrum, CMB Spectrum, Cosmic Background Radiation CMB, Kavli Foundation, Keck Foundation, NSF

LET PLANCK DO RIGHT BY THE WORLD

June 30, 2014

Things are hotting up. This is what will happen in a conference in Valencia, Spain later this week:

Another issue of particular interest is the results of the BICEP2 experiment, which according to recent announcement, establish some primary evidence of the cosmic inflation process that occurred in the first moments of the universe after the Big Bang. “A presentation and discussion of the results will be held as well as the confirmation or contestation that should be provided by the European satellite Planck. This issue is to be one of the hot moments of the Conference”, Fuster states.

Another report has it that a wood-framed glass case has been set up in front of Alan Guth’s MIT office to hold the forthcoming Nobel Diploma:

“It” is not just any prize but one thing in particular: a citation for the Nobel Prize in physics. Even since his remarkable work analyzing the gravitational ripples after the big bang, Guth’s perhaps inevitable acceptance of a Swedish-accented phone call from the Nobel committee is now the talk of the physics world.

When Planck issued its main results in 2013, no one asked them about corroborating the Nobel prizewinning COBE Satellite discovery of the 2.7 degree K cosmic blackbody spectrum, and the Planck team never said anything. They knew there was hide nor hair of this blackbody in the sky – but they kept mum. Faces were saved and science was sacrificed.

Now bicep2 is being readied for the next round of Big Bang Nobel Prizes. The first necessary step towards this – the publication of the discovery in a refereed journal – has already been accomplished. The dust issue will blow over (It was planned that way!). So the only other thing that is necessary now is for Planck to keep mum on bicep2 instrumental botch up. That will clear the way to filling Guth’s glass case.

Believe me, the Planck people are smart cookies, and if anyone within the establisahment has figured out that bicep2 was a scandalous instrumental botch up, the Planck people have. In fact, I would go so far as to surmise that they have known this from long before I ever came on the scene.

Since the Nobelgivers will not read Internet blog sites, they will never know that there were any instrumental issues in absence of any indications from Planck. Everything will be shipshape for the award to proceed.

(Have you been enjoying as much as I have this jockeying for position among the potential Inflation Nobel candidates? Kovac and Guth have the most campaign clout going for them!)

Don’t be COBEd by Planck yet once again, World! Don’t let them biceptwo you too. Don’t let them equivocate. Remember this:

planck satellite, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 cmb, bicep2 telescope, jean-jacques dordain esa, galactic dust, b-mode polarization, cosmic inflation, gravitational wave, john kovac harvard, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli

planck satellite, bicep2 discovery, bicep2 cmb, bicep2 telescope, jean-jacques dordain esa, galactic dust, b-mode polarization, cosmic inflation, gravitational wave, john kovac harvard, bicep2 nsf, bicep2 keck foundation, bicep2 kavli

WHY BICEP2 PAPER SHOULD BE RETRACTED, PART I

June 24, 2014

WHY BICEP2 PAPER SHOULD BE RETRACTED, PART I

PART I: THE APERTURE FAULT

I.1 Basic fallacies

Bicep2 is a refractor telescope directed at observing the polarization characteristics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB) at 150 GHz (wavelength 2 mm). It has an aperture diameter 26 cm. Its focal plane is populated by a large number ( ~ 500) of small (physically and electrically) antennas with wide beams. The linearly polarized antennas are alternately at 90 degrees to one another to receive two orthogonal polarizations.

The aperture of the bicep2 telescope has two fatal design faults stemming from:

A. MISUNDERSTANDINGS (of telescope science)

B. MISINFORMATION (about the amount of CMB power available in the sky)

I.2 Misunderstandings

While I cannot speak for others, I myself was most baffled that such a small diameter (about the diameter of a standard dinner plate) telescope could not only receive, but also produce detailed high resolution maps of the very dilute CMB radiation. Remember that the scientists and engineers in the past went to larger and larger collecting aperture from COBE to WMAP to Planck satellites – all directed at observing CMB. The COBE-FIRAS instrument which had a collecting area comparable to BICEP2 was a total failure.

However, the following scientific justification was offered by the bicep2 team for the use of the “novel” use of small aperture:

Small telescopes have an overlooked capability to gather a lot of light with a wide field of view. … it was a novel approach in CMB measurements and gave us an enormous 20 degree field of view. In fact the light gathering power of BICEP is not so different from that of the 10-meter telescope looming over us at the South Pole, but BICEP’s aperture is just 26 centimeters.

While it is not spelled out, this comment refers to an isotropic radiation field (which is what CMB is) where the spectral radiation flux Fν (watts per sq meter, say, integrated over the bandwidth) is the same in all directions.


Figure 1

Let

d = diameter of BICEP2 (= 26 cm)

D = diameter of 10-meter South Pole Telescope (=1000 cm)

A_B = PI*d**2/4, the aperture of BICEP2 telescope

A_SP = PI*D**2 /4, the aperture of South Pole Telescope

Referring to Figure 1, we see that for the BICEP2 Telescope, radiation enters the antenna aperture from all directions within its 20 degree field of view. For the narrow beam South Pole Telescope, radiation enters only in the direction parallel to the telescope axis. This is how it is possible for the same amount of radiation (watts) to enter the aperture of a small telescope and a large telescope. To this extent, the statement from the BICEP2 team is correct.

But it has nothing to do with anything.

What has everything to do with everything is how much radiation P (watts) is received by a single focal plane antenna element. This amount is

P_B = Fν*A_B

P_SP = Fν*A_SP

P_SP/P_B ~ 1500

So everything is in order. An antenna element at the focal plane of a small telescope receives little power, and the same at the focal plane of a large telescope receives great power. This is true in a directed radiation field or an isotropic radiation field. There is no “novel” way to defeat this basic physics.

The above comments pertain to the design of the BICEP2 Telescope. Is there any observational affirmation that the design is defective? It should be noted that Planck Satellite, with vastly larger aperture than BICEP2, reports low power levels difficult to process in the region of the sky that BICEP2 mapped with such clarity. This should rightly be accepted as the observational evidence that BICEP2 Telescope results do not pertain to CMB.

I.3 Misinformation

To design a telescope aperture, one needs a design value for the flux available. In this case it is the CMB flux Fν in the sky.

It is a matter of record that the BICEP2 Telescope was designed for a value of Fν corresponding to the ~ 3 K cosmic blackbody radiation discovered by the COBE Satellite.

However, it is an open secret within the scientific establishment that this blackbody does not exist and the actual value of Fν may be two orders of magnitude lower. This information has been available to the BICEP2 team for many years. But the academics have such an inflated collective ego that they would rather design wrong things and report wrong results than to acknowledge that a grave science fraud was committed with their COBE discovery.

The above two faults in BICEP2 design constitute more than enough reason to retract the BICEP2 discovery. However, in Part II I will discuss the BICEP2 imaging technique and associated faults for good measure. I will tell you about how a modern high precision multi-million dollar scientific instrument is periodically given a whirl the way Buddhist prayer wheels are periodically given a whirl.

I do not know yet if BICEP2 is periodically given a whack also, the way the olden days TVs sometimes needed to be given a whack. But I live and learn.

AND THAT’S ALL, FOLKS!

February 5, 2014

For seven years I have tried to bring American sham, scam and fraud science and its American purveyors to account.

The American scientific establishment continues to blatantly stonewall and raucously fete the purveyors.

The American Government continues to blatantly stonewall and raucously fete the purveyors.

The American Congress continues to blatantly stonewall and raucously fete the purveyors.

The young of America find no shame in glomming on to the greatest science fraud in history.

The European scientists are suppressing the truth they themselves have found out and are kowtowing to the Americans.

The Nobel-givers are kowtowing to the Americans.

The Vatican blesses the greatest fraud in the firmament history.

But it is not that I am giving up. I will continue to work on my free eBook designed to educate the World outside of the above spheres – should that world wish to be educated on this Great Evil that has befallen our civilization.

THE GEORGE SMOOT CHAPTER IS WRITTEN!

January 6, 2014

I have now completed a draft of the scientific chapter on George Smoot for my free eBook. Click on Chapter IV-3. Charles Bennett is included in this chapter.

THE JOHN MATHER CHAPTER IS WRITTEN!

January 2, 2014

I have now completed a draft of the scientific chapter on John Mather for my free eBook. Click on Chapter IV-2.