Posts Tagged ‘Science fraud through ages’

LIGO: Space warps, Ligonaut chirps

October 26, 2017


ligo science collaboration, lsc collaboration, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, ligo gravitational wave, binary black hole merger, binary neutron star merger, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize in physics 2017, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, nsf ligo, france cordova nsf, Fudan-Zhongzhi Science Award, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, pierre meystre, physical review letters

ligo science collaboration, lsc collaboration, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, ligo gravitational wave, binary black hole merger, binary neutron star merger, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize in physics 2017, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, nsf ligo, france cordova nsf, Fudan-Zhongzhi Science Award, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, pierre meystre, physical review letters

Advertisements

PHYSICS ESTABLISHMENT FRAUD EXPLAINED TO NONPHYSICISTS

May 18, 2017


Consider the first diagram which explains a communal diagram strategy pursued by the physics establishment.

Then consider the next diagram. It seems that they like this strategy very much, but only up to a point!

Not only are Big Bang and Inflation frauds, but the finding of the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is likewise a fraud.

From the Penzias-Wilson black body in 1964 to the inflation fraud today – it is a long string of ‘begats’ – fraud perpetuating fraud.


Big bang cosmology, inflation theory, cosmic black body spectrum, cosmic microwave background, cobe satellite, wmap satellite, planck satellite, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud

PHYSICS AND PHYSICISTS AT THE THRESHOLD OF 2017

January 2, 2017

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

LIGO: Sample nomination letter for Nobel Prize

October 11, 2016


Folks, the Nobel-for-LIGO campaign has started up all over again. They have started to build up a head of steam again. Witness:


“Everybody was shocked about that — but I’m not disappointed,” said (Laura) Greene, the president-elect of the American Physical Society. “I’m sure they’ll get the Nobel Prize at some point.”


“Natürlich gibt es dafür einen Nobelpreis, da geht gar kein Weg dran vorbei, aber eben noch nicht in diesem Jahr”, sagte Karsten Danzmann, Direktor des Max-Planck-Instituts für Gravitationsphysik, am Dienstag nach der Bekanntgabe der diesjährigen Preisträger.

So I thought I would help the campaign by drafting a sample nomination letter that makes the strongest possible case for the Prize. The central strategy is to create pressure on the Nobel Committee from as many directions as one can. This recommendation comes from an imaginary Professor Everard Vitton, a Rope Theorist.

Professor Sven Svensson
Chairman, 2017 Nobel Committee for Physics

Dear Professor Svensson:

Thank you for inviting me to nominate candidates for the 2017 Nobel Prize for Physics. Since self-nomination is not permitted, I would like to nominate instead Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss and Barry Barish for their discovery of black holes Merger & Acquisition with the LIGO instrument. This M&A creates the greatest IPO in the history of science. The stock will skyrocket.

As most authoritatively adjudged by science reporters and blog hosts, this discovery is a shoo-in for the Nobel Prize – a slam-dunk, a sure bet. Also, the sequential award to LIGO of the Breakthrough Prize, the Gruber Prize, the Shaw Prize and the Kavli Prize creates a strong collegial compulsion on the Nobel Committee to make this award and complete the sequence. After all, the tycoon prizes must stick together. Otherwise these other prizes will be left holding the bag. As it is, because of the Nobel non-award to LIGO this year, when Thorne and Weiss meet with President Obama in the Oval Office or hobnob with rented Hollywood divas in an airport hangar, there will be a dark cloud hanging over the ceremony.

Recently the world got the impression that whoever competently analyzed LIGO found it flawed to the extreme. Whoever gave kneejerk approval found it absolutely perfect. Do not be misled by this false impression. The former group constitutes riffraff while the latter group is made of establishment stalwarts.

The LIGO proponents, especially the establishment theorists and the science reporters, should be your most trusted counsel. As you know, I have been likened to Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, a fine experiment-oriented type. As such I can testify to things experimental even if I cannot tell which end of LIGO is up. And of course our top-flight academic experimentalists have fully endorsed LIGO even though they do not know which end of LIGO is down.

Kip Thorne, as he said himself, is a man of history. Rainer Weiss, when he said the Nobel Prize would —- up his life, actually meant that he would love to have the Prize. And please forgive Barry Barish’s showing that off-color graphic. It is nothing compared to what a US Presidential candidate has done.

In sum, Thorne, Weiss and Barish will eminently enhance that glorious roster hallowed by names like Penzias & Wilson, Smoot & Mather, and Perlmutter, Schmidt & Riess.

Sincerely yours,
Everard Vitton
Whatchamacallit Distinguished Chair of Mathematical Physics


ADDED 10/18/2016:

Folks, please to take a look at this old graphic of mine. Will there be more red ink here?

POST NO. 500: PUBLIC ADMISSION OF BIG BANG BOTCH UP

January 31, 2015

THIS POST IS REMOVED BECAUSE IT STEMMED FROM A MISUNDERSTANDING ON MY PART OF LANGUAGE IN A PRESS RELEASE. APOLOGIES!

SEE INSTEAD THE POST AFTER NEXT.

EVERYBODY UNDERSTAND WHAT BIG BANG COSMOLOGY TRULY IS

December 8, 2014

Here are the frontispieces of the sections of my Big Bang Fraud Book.

Always remember – don’t ever forget – that I have hauled away tens of billions of dollars worth of Big Bang garbage at no cost to you. My trash-collecting service is gratis.

BIG BANG COSMOLOGY: Not science fraud, but felony fraud

October 25, 2014


For a long time I have been saying that Big Bang Cosmology should be seen for what it is: Collective criminal defrauding of taxpayers under the elaborate cover of procedural legitimacy.

The following article therefore resonates with me:

It’s time to criminalise serious scientific misconduct

The opiner in this article has the stones. But this applies to Big Bang Cosmology (including the BICEP2 business unfolding now – a collective cover up of instrumental botch up) before it applies to any other scientific discipline.

More and more, such courageous voices of clear conscience will arise. And one day the world will understand and arise in great anger.

The problem with the physics establishment today is that nobody honest has the stones to take a stand against the criminals right in their midst…

UPDATED 10/26/14:

ELEMENTS OF FRAUD: LEGAL DEFINITION

Fraud must be proved by showing that the defendant’s actions involved five separate elements:

(1) a false statement of a material fact, (averral that the 2.7 K blackbody is real)

(2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue, (establishment knows what John Mather did; it knows that neither WMAP nor Planck found the blackbody. It simply keeps mum on this issue.)

(3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim,(knowing this full well, they continue to requisition billions of dollars of taxpayer money by false representation that the blackbody is real year after year after year.)

(4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement (children have been totally indoctrinated into these falsehoods; they have been harmed. government funding agencies have relied on these false representations to give out taxpayer money; Wikipedia, on which a great many rely, has become an instrument of Big Bang corruption; …), and

(5) injury to the alleged victim as a result (children are being mentally abused; other fields of science are being deprived of funds because Big Bang Cosmologists are usurping them; other cosmologies have been shut out by Big Bang Cosmologists riding roughshod over them; millions of dollars of bogus merchandise are being sold to the public, to the libraries, …)..

*****

And lastly, folks, note this one example (of multiple instances) how a NASA scientist is going around deriding the Steady State Cosmologists (at least they were honest scientists!):


Despite the now widely accepted Big Bang theory, Mather told the students it was not easy to convince skeptics who continued to believe the so-called steady-state theory that offered the universe has infinite age.

“They still wouldn’t give up,” said the astrophysicist. “We had to wait until they died,” he joked.

I feel greatly saddened to see the memory of the non-Big Bang Cosmologists being sullied this way before young students by a despicable fraud. They were good men and decent scientists. God rest their souls.

COSMOLOGICAL REDSHIFT: Physics first, damn it!

May 13, 2014

Big Bang Cosmology is an error of history. Again and again, physicists did not do their job when they needed to, and that is how Big Bang has got so much out of hand. That is how today wild and crazy mathematicians spin wild and crazy theories, and wild and crazy experimenters confirm them with wild and crazy accuracies. And the world laps it all up. And nothing is ever retracted!

My specific idea below in this context may or may not be right. But then, step up to the plate, you vaunted theoretical physicists! Clean up your own mess. How much longer am I going to carry the burden of your failure to do the right thing?!

I have presented my idea of the basic physics cause of cosmological redshift before here, but now I present it in a new context: If the flight-time stretching of wavelength of light has already been accepted as a physics effect, why not first consider the physics cause of it? Why bypass physics and jump to the ad hoc Big Bang cause?

Cosmological redshift, Edwin Hubble, George Lemaitre, Hubble’s law, Big Bang Cosmology, expanding universe, stretching of space

Cosmological redshift, Edwin Hubble, George Lemiitre, Hubble’s law, Big Bang Cosmology, expanding universe, stretching of space

SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, SCIENCE FRAUD: Who’s committing it?

October 9, 2013

[Click to enlarge]
Nobel Prize Physics fraud scientific misconduct science fraud NASA Big Bang Cosmology fraud John Mather Nobel Prize John Mather Nobel Laureate John Mather NASA

Nobel Prize Physics fraud scientific misconduct science fraud NASA Big Bang Cosmology fraud John Mather Nobel Prize John Mather Nobel Laureate John Mather NASA
.

[Click to enlarge]
Anil Potti, Dipak Das, Bharat Aggarwal, John Mather, George Smoot, Charles Bennett, Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, Adam Riess, science frauds

Anil Potti, Dipak Das, Bharat Aggarwal, John Mather, George Smoot, Charles Bennett, Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, Adam Riess, science frauds

THE GREAT PHYSICS FRAUD TRIO

May 13, 2013


[Click to enlarge]
Science fraud physics scientific misconduct, Big Bang Cosmology Theory CMB Relic Radiation Blackbody Spectrum, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate, University of California Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Victor Ninov, Jan Hendrik Schon

Science fraud physics scientific misconduct, Big Bang Cosmology Theory CMB Relic Radiation Blackbody Spectrum, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate, University of California Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Victor Ninov, Jan Hendrik Schon