Posts Tagged ‘Showcasing science fraud’

The Brotherhood of Nobel

January 17, 2018

john mather, john mather nobel prize, john mather nasa, carl wieman, carl wieman nobel prize, nobel prize physics, nobel prize in physics, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, ostp, ostp white house, science fraud, physics fraud, scientific misconduct

john mather, john mather nobel prize, john mather nasa, carl wieman, carl wieman nobel prize, nobel prize physics, nobel prize in physics, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, ostp, ostp white house, science fraud, physics fraud, scientific misconduct

Advertisements

LIGO FRAUD: Apportionment of blame

January 16, 2018


This is the link for the quotation in the following graphic.


ligo discovery, ligo nobel prize, lsc collaboration, ligo india, american physical society, american institute of physics, american astronomical society, institute of physics, european physical society, national academy of sciences, aaas, pierre meystre, physical review letters, astrophysical journal letters, nobel prize physics 2017, carl-henrik heldin, christina moberg kth, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, france cordova nsf, national science foundation, national science board, black hole apocalypse, black hole apocalypse nova, black hole apocalypse pbs, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, rafael l. reif mit, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel prize, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, edward witten, joseph weber award, joseph weber award for astronomical instrumentation, fudan-zhongzhi science award, icts bangalore, icts bengaluru, Vishveshwara Lectures, Infosys Science Foundation

ligo discovery, ligo nobel prize, lsc collaboration, ligo india, american physical society, american institute of physics, american astronomical society, institute of physics, european physical society, national academy of sciences, aaas, pierre meystre, physical review letters, astrophysical journal letters, nobel prize physics 2017, carl-henrik heldin, christina moberg kth, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, france cordova nsf, national science foundation, national science board, black hole apocalypse, black hole apocalypse nova, black hole apocalypse pbs, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, rafael l. reif mit, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel prize, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, edward witten, joseph weber award, joseph weber award for astronomical instrumentation, fudan-zhongzhi science award, icts bangalore, icts bengaluru, Vishveshwara Lectures, Infosys Science Foundation

LIGO: The Great Academic Betrayal

January 14, 2018


A proverb applicable to those who continue to promote, protect or otherwise condone the LIGO fraud:

“He that lieth down with dogs shall rise up with fleas”


ligo discovery, ligo nobel prize, lsc collaboration, ligo india, american physical society, american institute of physics, american astronomical society, institute of physics, european physical society, national academy of sciences, aaas, physical review letters, astrophysical journal letters, nobel prize physics 2017, carl-henrik heldin, christina moberg kth, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, france cordova nsf, national science foundation, national science board, black hole apocalypse, black hole apocalypse nova, black hole apocalypse pbs, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, rafael l. reif mit, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel prize, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, edward witten, Christopher L. Eisgruber, Christopher L. Eisgruber princeton, ias princeton, institute for advanced study princeton

ligo discovery, ligo nobel prize, lsc collaboration, ligo india, american physical society, american institute of physics, american astronomical society, institute of physics, european physical society, national academy of sciences, aaas, physical review letters, astrophysical journal letters, nobel prize physics 2017, carl-henrik heldin, christina moberg kth, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, france cordova nsf, national science foundation, national science board, black hole apocalypse, black hole apocalypse nova, black hole apocalypse pbs, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, rafael l. reif mit, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel prize, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, edward witten, Christopher L. Eisgruber, Christopher L. Eisgruber princeton, ias princeton, institute for advanced study princeton

LIGO and the cabals of corrupt intellectuals

January 11, 2018


lsc collaboration, ligo india, american physical society, america institute of physics, american astronomical society, institute of physics, national academy of sciences, aaas, physical review letters, nobel prize physics 2017, carl-henrik heldin, christina moberg kth, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, france cordova nsf, black hole apocalypse, lack hole apocalypse nova, black hole apocalypse pbs, infosys prize, infosys prize 2017, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, rafael l. reif mit, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel laureate, david reitze, Priyamvada Natarajan, Priyamvada Natarajan yale, Janna Levin, paula apsell, paula apsell nova

.
.
infosys prize, infosys prize 2017, ligo india, infosys science foundation, kip thorne nobel prize, kip thorne


infosys prize, infosys prize 2017, ligo india, infosys science foundation, kip thorne nobel prize, kip thorne

Fake Baba Kip goes to India

January 8, 2018


Kip Thorne is expected to be in Bangalore this week. On January 10, he will felicitate this year’s winners of the Infosys Prize. The winners will be shaking hands with him – all smiley smiley – and be recorded for posterity on videotape. I suppose that’s OK as long as the winners don’t mind a lifelong blight on their public images. They have each made that choice: US$100,000 to publicly shake hands with the greatest science fraud in history.

I once read a person lamenting: “My degree certificate is signed by Ken Lay. I have had bad luck ever since.”

After that, as soon as I could dig up my degree certificate to check whose signature was on it, I found it was

Ronald Reagan

So that was OK. And while at it, I can tell you that my thesis was signed by

Hannes Alfvén

So that was OK too. I am pretty much blight-free, I’d say. So I feel a little bad for the bright, up and coming folks who won the Infosys Prize. But, as I said, these are adults who made the conscious choice to aid and abet the grooming of a science fraud before the world, for a price. Doctor Faustus would approve. Whoever foisted Kip Thorne on them did not mean them well. Not at all.

Kip_Thorne_Royal_snub

On January 11, Kip Thorne will give a much-publicized lecture at the International Center for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS), Bangalore. It will be on gravitational wave discovery.

Thorne’s lecture will be a pack of lies from beginning to end. There has never been a detection of gravitational wave. Witness:

(1). Thorne’s theory calculations have been pointed out to be deceitful.

(2). I have proved his instrumentation to be a fraud.

(3). I have also proved that his interfacing of his theory and his experiment was an additional fraud.

Kip Thorne is a 100% authentic fraud that the Indian scientific community will be worshipping with great reverence. And why not? They worshipped exposed fraud Nobel Laureates John Mather, George Smoot, David Gross …

India has become a veritable colonial outpost for grooming sahib frauds.

DAVID REITZE LAYING GARBAGE SCIENCE THICK ON INDIA

January 8, 2018


LIGO Executive Director David Reitze is in India this week. He has created a huge media blitz there with his totally upbeat pronouncements of LIGO, emphasizing that an India LIGO is needed to better localize gravitational wave sources in the sky. This is utterly, patently and absurdly false physics. You cannot localize a source by having observatories that are closer than the wavelength, period. In fact, the station spacing has to be far greater than the wavelength.

But this blatantly irresponsible and reckless conduct on the part of one who is essentially representing the US officially, with international implications of his actions, again highlights the fact that LIGO is out of control. It has nothing to do with science at all. It never had.

Start viewing LIGO as criminal fraud

January 3, 2018


The history of cosmology is replete with efforts of individuals or small groups battling a mighty establishment. The most prominent “establishment” we have is Big Bang Cosmology – a totally bogus science built on fraudulent discoveries. No one – repeat no one – has made any headway against this mafialike syndicate that was sucking up all available resources and workspace and public exposure. The dissidents (like Hannes Alfvén, Fred Hoyle, Halton Arp…) used the gentlemanly language of polite discourse, and gained no ground whatsoever. They died with the knowledge that they were right but that no one was coming forward to help them.

If you are battling something, you have to know what it is. You have to start by calling it by its right name. The right names to consider today are criminal fraud and organized crime. The stark language of public accountability is needed. The very last thing we want here is polite discourse circumscribed by learned community rules.

This is because the syndicate hides behind a façade of correct procedure: peer review, grant review, prizes and accolades etc., the way the Mafia hid behind legitimate-sounding businesses. This whole façade today is a sham: The reviews etc are controlled by this very syndicate. We have seen this: The Physical Review Letters will publish any crap that comes from LIGO. The National Science Board backs LIGO funding decade after decade. If this Board is not packed with consummate morons, then it knows that LIGO is a fraud. It is a fool’s errand to try to fight this evil in the scientific arena. If you do that, you have already lost.

LIGO is a mafialike syndicate. Once you realize this, everything will fall in place for you. The only way to tackle this apocalyptic evil that has befallen the human society is through the laws of the land. We need Eliot Ness and the Untouchables.

The Last Train from Fraud Hill

December 29, 2017


Pardon me, boy, is that the Chattanooga Choo Choo?
No, Sir, this is the Stockholm Boo Boo.

LIGO COURTROOM DRAMA: Trial Part 15

December 29, 2017

TRIAL PART 15

ON THE WITNESS STAND: Olga Botner (for the Defendants)

VINO MOSCATO (Attorney for the Defendants): Professor Botner, you are a member of the Committee that awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics. You had no obligation to come to this court, but you agreed to help the defendant Nobel Laureates in this case to the extent you can. The defendants are grateful for that. The parties in this case have stipulated that because of the Nobel secrecy rules, there are some areas we cannot go into. So if we ask any questions in those areas, you may simply decline to answer. Now Professor Botner, you and the Chairman of your Committee, Professor Nils Martensson, are two world-renowned experimentalists on the Committee, are you not?

OLGA BOTNER: We are experimentalists, yes.

MOSCATO: So is it correct to say that the two of you – who by the way work at the same place – that you have fully evaluated the LIGO experiment personally and collaboratively to your satisfaction before deciding on the award?

BOTNER: I cannot answer who evaluated what and how.

MOSCATO: But can you say if there are any doubts about the instrument being perfect?

BOTNER: Obviously, since we have given the Nobel Prize, there are no doubts.

MOSCATO: Thank you, Professor Botner. I have no further questions at this time. Your witness, Ms. Veritas.

ASSUMPTA VERITAS (Attorney for the Plaintiffs): Good Morning, Professor Botner. Were you and your fellow committeemen aware about any issues that had been raised by some critics about the LIGO instrument when you were deliberating on this award?

BOTNER: I cannot answer that.

VERITAS: OK. I will ask this another way. LIGO has two mirrors that are about 5.7 kilometers apart, and are not mechanically coupled in any way. The mirrors hang freely. The axes of the two mirrors are at right angles. Would that be a correct description?

BOTNER: In a simple way, yes.

VERITAS: We will keep it simple then. These mirrors move or oscillate or vibrate for a number of reasons: earth tremors, vehicles passing by and so on. Is this correct?

BOTNER: Yes.

VERITAS: Do the mirrors vibrate independently of each other – or is this some type of concerted motion?

BOTNER: They vibrate independently.

VERITAS: And what happens when a gravitational wave comes down?

BOTNER: Then the mirrors move in a concerted motion, as predicted by theory.

VERITAS: Is this concert observable? I mean, how do we know that the mirrors are moving in concert when normally they do not and there is no coupling of any kind between them?

BOTNER: We cannot actually observe this concerted motion because it is extremely small. But the LIGO readout shows that the motion is concerted.

VERITAS: Are you saying that the LIGO readout wiggles prove a concerted motion is prevailing?

BOTNER: Well, no. The concerted motion is a property of the gravitational wave. The wiggles tell us a gravitational wave is passing by, and that is how we then know that the mirrors must be in concerted motion.

VERITAS: And how exactly do the wiggles tell you that they are from a gravitational wave passing by?

BOTNER: Because the wiggles match black hole merger model.

VERITAS: You are trying to prove the existence of theorized gravitational waves by utilizing their theorized property of producing concerted motion. So isn’t the concerted motion the first thing you have to experimentally demonstrate as happening? How can you gloss over the very point of the experiment, the very purpose for which LIGO was built?

BOTNER: There is no way to demonstrate the concerted motion directly. We assume it to be happening.

VERITAS: That makes the whole business of LIGO detecting gravitational waves just an assumption in its entirety. Isn’t that right? It is just your word. There is absolutely no science behind this.

BOTNER: No, it is not right. LIGO is a high quality instrument for detecting gravitational waves.

VERITAS: Now, in reality, those mirrors are contained within a hermetically sealed steel vessel. So, you say that the gravitational wave does some business inside the vessel, business that you have no way of verifying. There is going on some type of unobservable entanglement of the two mirror motions. Then you say Hail Mary full of grace, and simply declare that the said business has actually taken place inside the vessel. Then you start matching this black hole merger stuff. And then you string together a complete story. Is that even remotely a scientific way of doing things?

BOTNER: I cannot answer that question because of Nobel secrecy.

VERITAS: Ah … the Nobel secrecy! Your Honor, I have no further questions.

JUDGE: Any redirect, Mr. Moscato?

MOSCATO: Yes, Your Honor. Professor Botner, did the Nobel Committee not say that the first LIGO detection was model independent? In other words, the black hole merger model is not necessary to invoke in order to demonstrate that the mirrors are in concerted motion? Wouldn’t that mean that just the readout wiggles by themselves prove that concerted motion is happening inside the vessel?

BOTNER: I .. er .. cannot go into that area.

MOSCATO: No further questions, You Honor.

JUDGE: The witness is excused.

WHY U.S. SHOULD PROSECUTE LIGO

December 27, 2017

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT:

Over the past two years, a series of fantastic astronomical discoveries in the realm of gravitational waves (resulted from black hole merger, neutron star merger) has created a worldwide media blitz. The scientific instrument that made these discoveries is called the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO). Every single one of these discoveries was a scientific fraud.

In a bizarre spectacle, three LIGO leaders just received the Nobel Prize in Physics. This is stark testimony to the breadth and the depth of intellectual corruption we are witnessing.

THE CASE AGAINST LIGO:

(1). The LIGO team built an instrument network that has been placed in documented scientific evidence in public as not being able to do what it had set out to do (detect gravitational waves). This has not been admitted by the LIGO team, and the falsehood that LIGO is a proven detector of gravitational waves has been strongly maintained by the LIGO team and a number of supporting/enabling groups.

(2). Assuming for the sake of argument that LIGO were in principle able to detect gravitational waves, there still remain (publicly documented) fatal scientific defects that have not been admitted by the LIGO team, and the false discoveries have been strongly maintained.

(3). LIGO has thus far cost upwards of 1 billion tax dollars, and more moneys are being requisitioned on the strength of the patently false discoveries reported.

(4). LIGO’s main funding agency, National science Foundation, is in evidence as being blind and deaf to scientific criticism by qualified and credentialed scientists. On the contrary, emphatic statements issued by the agency could have the effect of deterring any such criticisms.

Anyone interested may start with this blog site. First read the “LIGO scamorama” series of graphics; and then dig deeper by reading the “LIGO Courtroom Drama” series. Then there is my book.

When the LIGO scientists and engineers are put on a witness stand under penalty of perjury, and there is not that fearsome establishment power (ride roughshod over everything, totally ignore scientific criticisms) that protects them outside of the courtroom, the whole thing will quickly unravel. This is why criminal prosecution is the only way to stop this runaway corruption that is bleeding the taxpayers interminably.

The principle of self-policing promulgated by the scientific establishment is a ruse to prevent outside prying, and to do ‘damage control’. What small policing effort there was in this regard by a few insiders was ignored out of hand. A recent report by a UC Berkeley expert showing that the results for all but one of the discovery reports “are very weak signals whose amplitude does not rise significantly during the GW (Gravitational Wave) event, and they are indistinguishable from non-stationary detector noise.” This momentous study had zero impact on the triumphal march of LIGO. We are dealing with a mafialike syndicate. The facts on the ground are absolutely clear: Nothing short of a courtroom setting can address this the greatest and the longest-running science fraud in history.

If President Donald Trump genuinely wishes to take a stand against corrupt scientists defrauding the nation with the help of the corrupt media, this is the exact place to take that stand. He did not felicitate the American LIGO Nobel Laureates, for whatever reason. He lucked out. There will be no photographs of him shaking hands with frauds.