Posts Tagged ‘The Age of Fakery’

LIGO NOBEL: A Duty-to-inform message

October 20, 2017


nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nobel fraud, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, nobel committee for physics, nobel committee for physics 2017, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, david reitze ligo, physical review letters, pierre meystre, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, nils martensson, olga botner

nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nobel fraud, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, nobel committee for physics, nobel committee for physics 2017, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, david reitze ligo, physical review letters, pierre meystre, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, nils martensson, olga botner

Advertisements

LIGO COURTROOM DRAMA: Trial Part 8

October 13, 2017

TRIAL PART 8

ON THE WITNESS STAND: Rainer Weiss (for the Defendants)

VINO MOSCATO (Attorney for the Defendants): Professor Weiss, it is an honor to have you here. Congratulations on your Nobel Prize. Now, we know that you do not read stuff Dr. De puts out on the Internet or his book on LIGO. But at my request, you read that book before coming here. What is your reaction?

RAINER WEISS: I believe he cannot understand that LIGO is a novel instrument which cannot be judged by conventional instrumentation concepts.

MOSCATO: So is his entire book dismissible?

WEISS: I believe so.

MOSCATO: Is it correct to conclude that Dr. De is wallowing in his own misunderstandings in his book?

WEISS: I think that’s right.

MOSCATO: Thank you, Professor Weiss. I will not burden you further with this sort of thing. Your witness, Ms. Veritas.

ASSUMPTA VERITAS (Attorney for the Plainfiffs): Good Morning, Professor Weiss. Let’s get right down to it. Does the LIGO instrument have an input signal and an output signal, and if so, what are they? Also, for the ease of understanding, let us use the term wiggle for signal.

WEISS: Yes, there is an input wiggle and there is an output wiggle. The input wiggle would be a time trace of a number that is the linear size of something that is being sequentially contracted and expanded by the passage of a gravitational wave. The output wiggle would be this same wiggle as reported by the LIGO measuring system.

VERITAS: And the two wiggles are different?

WEISS: Yes.

VERITAS: So, is Dr. De correct in describing LIGO as a two-port instrument with an input port and an output port?

WEISS: We don’t look at it this way, but that description is OK up to a point.

VERITAS: And is he correct in saying that the input wiggle and the output wiggle – which are different – are related by an Instrument Transfer Function which must be determined and reported for LIGO to be a valid scientific instrument?

WEISS: This is where his confusion begins. What we do with LIGO is take the output wiggle as reported by LIGO, remove the noise component from it, and what remains is the input wiggle. This process is our equivalent of the conventional Transfer Function. The Instrument Transfer Function procedure is not applicable to LIGO.

VERITAS: Thank you for that clear statement. And the stuff you remove as noise, where does it come from?

WEISS: There are very many sources of noise – seismic ground vibration, a truck passing by, waves lapping on shore, distant thunder, … , And then there are also many types of instrument-origined noise.

VERITAS: When you speak of noise here, anything that is not gravitational wave signal is noise. Is this correct?

WEISS: Yes.

VERITAS: Very good. So, let us make a list of all possible external noise sources and label them A through K, say. Then all instrument-origined noise L through P, say. And let Q be the gravitational wave signal. So when your computer takes out the noise part, does it subdivide the noise into all these categories A through P, and show the tabulated values for the categories?

WEISS: Of course not. Our sophisticated digital technique can distinguish between signal and noise, and remove all that it identifies as noise, namely, A through P taken as a consolidated lump. Only the signal Q then remains, and that is the input wiggle. This is what we compare with the theory wiggle for black hole merger.

VERITAS: But the instrument-origined noise L through P is different from external noise A through K. The latter is not dependent on LIGO, the former is. It is more likely than not that L-P is correlated with Q, the input signal. The “noise” L-P could be harmonics of Q, for example. If your algorithm has instruction to take out out L-P, would not it take out some of Q as well? Or wouldn’t it leave some of L-P with Q? You simply cannot lump together A-K and L-P for the purpose of extracting Q. It may be convenient for the computer, but it is wrong physics.

WEISS: Now we are getting into complicated areas.

VERITAS: Not at all. We have just clarified your misunderstanding. It is the components L through P that necessitate the Instrument Transfer Function, not A through K. You are mixing up and mishandling them, and you are doing so to your benefit. By bypassing the Transfer Function procedure, you have given yourself leeway to make up your custom discovery wiggles from the data. There is nothing about LIGO that cannot be described and analyzed in terms of conventional instrument concept. What is your response to that?

WEISS: As I said, this subject is too complicated.

VERITAS: OK, let’s move on. As Dr. De has pointed out in his book, there is no written evidence anywhere that you have taken into account the Earth’s static magnetic field on the LIGO instrument all these years. What do you have to say about that?

WEISS: This effect is being studied.

VERITAS: So are your discoveries valid even though you left out this effect?

WEISS: This effect cannot be so important as to invalidate our discoveries.

VERITAS: And then Dr. De has also pointed out that you take the hypothetical properties of gravitational wave as true and operative, to deduce the passage of gravitational wave. You assume that the mirror motions are invisibly entangled (because a gravitational wave is passing through) to prove that a gravitational wave has passed through. There is absolutely no experimental evidence of any kind that the mirror motions are in invisible entanglement. This is a pure flight of fancy that leads you to report a tangible discovery.

WEISS: As I said, this is too complicated.

VERITAS: Dr. De has also shown that LIGO is not a complete scientific instrument. I believe the expression he used is “it is not all there.” LIGO cannot detect gravitational waves even if they existed and traversed LIGO. That is because it is the invisible entanglement of the mirrors that LIGO must experimentally demonstrate to report the detection of the wave. And LIGO has no way to do this.

WEISS: We have detected gravitational wave – four times now.

VERITAS: So you say. Professor Weiss, who is wallowing in his own misunderstanding, you or Dr. De? And what about your 1000 colleagues?

MOSCATO: Objection, Your Honor. There is no cause for this kind of taunt.

JUDGE: Overruled. You started this, Mr. Moscato!

VERITAS: Your Honor, I have no further questions.

JUDGE: The witness is excused.

THE DIABOLIC CON OF WEISS AND THORNE

October 8, 2017


Of the many expansive scientific lies upon which LIGO is built, perhaps the most effective one for them is that (they say in their website) LIGO is blind to electromagnetic (EM) signals. LIGO senses only mechanical vibrations.

It is in fact EM that LIGO sees most readily. Here is how it works: An EM disturbance is incident on LIGO steel tubes. Since the walls of the tube are thin, this disturbance penetrates through and hits the LIGO innards, in which electric currents are generated. However, there is the Earth’s static magnetic field. Therefore the innards are set in mechanical vibration (following that old motor principle). And such mechanical vibrations are precisely what LIGO is designed to detect.

It seems that the Ligonauts suffer from clinical amnesia about the Earth’s magnetic field, which is THE most crucial factor for their instrument.

Additionally, the km-scale LIGO tubes are especially efficient attractors of geomagnetic disturbances.

Thus, quite unintentionally, LIGO is a fine detector of geomagnetic disturbances, and nothing else.

All this I have explained in this blog within days after the first LIGO detection was announced. They are also in my book.

So you can see that simultaneous observation of a signal at two or three stations does not make a case for gravitational wave. Chirp, ringdown etc – if they are truly present in the data – are related to instrument response upon being actuated by a geomagnetic disturbance. Everything is terrestrial. There is no cause here to invoke extraterrestrial phenomena unless there is some pressing need to come up with grandiose discoveries.

One of the important conclusions that follows is that nothing the Ligonauts say, or explain should be believed. If anyone is interested in assessing anything about LIGO, they have to go completely outside the physics establishment, and ask some group that this establishment cannot “get to.” The establishment can no longer be trusted – not for scientific competence nor for honesty.


nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel prize, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, ligo india, ligo kagra, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board

nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel prize, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, ligo india, ligo kagra, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board

LEMME ‘SPLAIN LIGO TO THE SWEDES….

October 7, 2017


Folks, do you know that even as the LIGO Nobel Prize was announced, there was a very prominent and widely known position within the physics establishment that there was no discovery here? This position was held by some scientists at the University of Copenhagen.

Do you also know that there was a position communicated directly to the Nobel Committee that the LIGO instrument had no valid calibration? A scientific instrument without calibration is like a tape measure without any markings on it.

Both positions are correct, and they together establish without the slightest question that there was no discovery. No way no how.

Do you also know that the Nobel folks have repeatedly expressed the position that they like to wait many years after a discovery is reported to be sure that it can stand the test of time?

So why was this prize given in an unseemly hurry under these clear circumstances? And why isn’t anybody raising any issues about this most bizarre award in the entire history of the Nobel Prize?

The LIGO Nobel Prize was rammed through with total disregard for science or society or even the Nobel tradition. It is a dirty power play on the part of some very ugly people hellbent on prevailing against any dissent of any kind. They have some agenda and some timetable, and no one is going to stand in their way.They are not going to wait for anyone or anything.

But, lighten up. May be I can use a little humor to explain to the Swedes for once what it is that they have just anointed.



nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, kip thorne, rainer weiss

nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, kip thorne, rainer weiss

BILLION-DOLLAR BULLSHIT AWARDED NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS 2017

October 6, 2017

The following conclusions are from my book. Conclusions 1 – 11 are in the book, and Conclusion 12 has been added for clarity.

The first edition of the book was published in August 2016, and was available the whole time the Nobel Prize deliberations were taking place.

THE NOBEL FIRMAMENT

October 5, 2017


nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga Vetenskapsakademien, ligo collaboration, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, john mather nobel prize, rainer weiss nobel prize, saul perlmutter nobel prize, national science foundation, national science board, pontifical academy of sciences

nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga Vetenskapsakademien, ligo collaboration, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, john mather nobel prize, rainer weiss nobel prize, saul perlmutter nobel prize, national science foundation, national science board, pontifical academy of sciences

THE LIGO NOBEL PRIZE RUSH JOB

October 4, 2017


nobel prize, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, rainer weiss nobel prize, kip thorne nobel prize, ligo collaboration, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo

nobel prize, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, rainer weiss nobel prize, kip thorne nobel prize, ligo collaboration, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo

NOBEL BY NUMBER

October 4, 2017


nobel prize, nobel prize physics, nobel prize fraud, scientific misconduct, science fraud, ligo discovery, asymptotic freedom, penzias -wilson, smoot mather, wilczek politzer gross, perlmutter schmidt reese, weiss thorne barish

nobel prize, nobel prize physics, nobel prize fraud, scientific misconduct, science fraud, ligo discovery, asymptotic freedom, penzias -wilson, smoot mather, wilczek politzer gross, perlmutter schmidt reese, weiss thorne barish

Read all about it here:

SERIAL SCIENCE FRAUD AWARDED NOBEL PRIZE

October 3, 2017

.

.


nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, royal swedish academy of sciences, nobel foundation, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l. rafael reif mit

nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, royal swedish academy of sciences, nobel foundation, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, l. rafael reif mit

LIGO FOURTH DETECTION

October 1, 2017


ligo fourth detection, Ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, ligo nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board, pierre meystre, physical review letters, kip thorne, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss ligo, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, gabriella gonzalez ligo, tarun souradeep, somak raychaudhury, breakthrough prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, korber foundation prize, princess of asturias prize, udan-zhongzhu science award, Frédérique Marion ligo, Giovanni Losurdo ligo, fred raab ligo, Jo van den Brand ligo

ligo fourth detection, Ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, ligo nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board, pierre meystre, physical review letters, kip thorne, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss ligo, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, laura cadonati ligo, gabriella gonzalez ligo, tarun souradeep, somak raychaudhury, breakthrough prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, korber foundation prize, princess of asturias prize, udan-zhongzhu science award, Frédérique Marion ligo, Giovanni Losurdo ligo, fred raab ligo, Jo van den Brand ligo
</FONT