Posts Tagged ‘TIME MAGAZINE’s influential man is a fraud’

PHYSICS AND PHYSICISTS AT THE THRESHOLD OF 2017

January 2, 2017

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

american institute of physics, american physical society, optical society of america, society of physics students, physical review, physical review letters, physics today, nature magazine, science magazine, science news, pbs nova, ostp, ostp white house, nsf, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, nasa, ligo gravitational waves, ligo india, cobe satellite, big bang cosmology, big bang theory cosmology, bicep2, harvard smithsonian center for astrophysics,kip thorne ligo, kip thorne caltech, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss caltech, john mather, john mather nasa, john kovac harvard, nobel prize in physics, nobel prize physics, physics nobel prize, kavli prize, gruber prize, shaw prize, breakthrough prize, time magazine most influential person, 2016 breakthrough of the year, scientific breakthrough of the year, nature’s 10, scientific misconduct, science fraud

Advertisements

THE LIGO SCAM BOOK IT IS HERE!

August 1, 2016

bibhas de, bibhas de book, ligo, ligo gravitational wave, gravitational wave, black hole merger, binary black hole merger, ligo discovery, gravitational wave observatory, gravitational wave astronomy, physical review letters, ligo criticism, ligo investigative report, ligo scam, ligo fraud, ligo hoax, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, ligo breakthrough prize, ligo shaw prize, ligo kavli prize, ligo gruber prize, ligo india, ligo indigo, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss ligo, kip thorne time100, kip thorne most influential person, ligo scientific collaboration, france cordova ligo, david reitze ligo, ligo senate hearing, ligo dissidents, michio kaku ligo, brian greene ligo, lawrence krauss ligo

LIGO fraud

bibhas de, bibhas de book, ligo, ligo gravitational wave, gravitational wave, black hole merger, binary black hole merger, ligo discovery, gravitational wave observatory, gravitational wave astronomy, physical review letters, ligo criticism, ligo investigative report, ligo scam, ligo fraud, ligo hoax, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, ligo breakthrough prize, ligo shaw prize, ligo kavli prize, ligo gruber prize, ligo india, ligo indigo, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss ligo, kip thorne time100, kip thorne most influential person, ligo scientific collaboration, france cordova ligo, david reitze ligo, ligo senate hearing, ligo dissidents, michio kaku ligo, brian greene ligo, lawrence krauss ligo

LIGO fraud

bibhas de, bibhas de book, ligo, ligo gravitational wave, gravitational wave, black hole merger, binary black hole merger, ligo discovery, gravitational wave observatory, gravitational wave astronomy, physical review letters, ligo criticism, ligo investigative report, ligo scam, ligo fraud, ligo hoax, nsf ligo, mit ligo, caltech ligo, ligo breakthrough prize, ligo shaw prize, ligo kavli prize, ligo gruber prize, ligo india, ligo indigo, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss ligo, kip thorne time100, kip thorne most influential person, ligo scientific collaboration, france cordova ligo, david reitze ligo, ligo senate hearing, ligo dissidents, michio kaku ligo, brian greene ligo, lawrence krauss ligo


Q: How much does the book cost?

A: The physical book costs about as much as a Cafe Mocha Grande. The eBook you can buy with change you may find in your sofa.

Q: When will the book be available?

A: The book is available now on

createspace.com

amazon.com

amazon.com (eBook)

In a few days it will be available online widely.

For more information visit the book’s web page:

UNCHALLENGED PRIVILEGE

THE LIGO FRAUD FOR THINKY FOLKS

May 5, 2016

While Thorne and the Ligonauts are reveling on the good ship Ligosy on high seas, let us schmooze a little.

In various prior posts I explained what LIGO actually observed (geomagnetic disturbance.) However, if you are interested only in the proof that LIGO never detected any gravitational waves, you need not go into all that. This proof comes entirely from the LIGO discovery diagram itself.

I. THE DISCOVERY ASSUMPTIONS

The inference of detection of gravitational wave and the discovery of Blackhole merger rest 100% on these unproven claims about the instrument:

(a). The instrument functions at such level of precision that it can quantify “movement” down to one-thousandth the diameter of a proton.

(b). The gravitational waveform incident on LIGO appears as an interferometer-generated waveform at its output, where the two waveforms are linked by the transfer function of an ideal instrument. Only then can a prediction-verification connection be established between the two waveforms (i.e. there’s present no instrumental distortion.)

(c). The two LIGO instruments are functionally identical.

The precision of (a) and the idealness of (b) are interlinked. If you say instrument has any distortion, then that precision is degraded.

II. LIGO INSTRUMENTAL DISTORTION

Instrumental distortion of an input signal passing through the instrument can be understood in simplified terms as follows.

Let g(t) be the strain (fractional length change) created at LIGO by the incident gravitational waveform, taken in its entirety (starting from zero baseline and coming back to zero baseline.)

Let I(f) be the instrument transfer function (f = frequency).

The signal g(t) can be decomposed into its constituent frequencies:

g(f) = ∫g(t) exp (-2i π ft) dt

At the output of the instrument, g(f) is modified to

h(f) = g(f)xI(f)

Now the output signal is

h(t) = ∫g(f) exp (2i π ft) df

The LIGO output strain h(t) is a computer-generated trace obtained from the LIGO inteferometer.

So this is how g(t) is transformed to h(t).

The LIGO discovery assumes without proof that I(f) = 1.

In addition to I(f), there can be external sources of noise N(f) that will need to be expressed as a strain and added to g(f).

III. LIGO OBSERVATION AND THE CORRECT CONCLUSIONS

ligo_data

(1) Whereas the predicted LIGO incident signal (bottom panels) is a smooth undulation, the observed output signal (top panel) is jagged and sharp. There is no physical process in Blackhole merger that can imprint such features in the gravitational waveform. These features are added by instrumental effect I(f). The Ligonauts have averred strongly that there is no external noise of any kind in the main body of the signal.

Thus no prediction-verification link can be made between the input signal and the output signal before quantifying that instrument effect I(f).

Once this effect is quantified and removed from h(t), one can have a waveform g(t) that is to be compared with the predicted waveform (bottom panels).

With known instruments – such as a radio telescope – this is not a problem. The observed signal will generally be found to be a corrupted version of the incident signal. However, LIGO is an entirely unknown territory and one can make no such statements.

Furthermore, I(f) is not quantifiable because the conditions of a gravitational wave cannot be reproduced in a controlled experiment.

The ringing and the chirp in h(t) – the telltale identifying signatures of the Blackhole merger – could have come from I(f), for all we know. We have absolutely no knowledge what g(t) was actually observed . The bottom panels in the above figure are not g(t). The world has been deceived into thinking it is. This is the central LIGO deception.

(2) The output signals h(t) at two stations (WA and LA) are different from each other, counterindicating a gravitational waveform. (There is no way in which the gravitational waveform g (t) can change between two stations.)

(3) Any explaining away of these conundrums to salvage the discovery would require invoking ad hoc instrumental faults. But any such faults would undermine both the discovery assumptions (a) and (b), and hence the discovery itself.

There is no way out. This is what happens when you operate with an uncharacterized and uncharacterizable instrument.

But of course these conundrums are not real. They arise falsely because the inference of detection of gravitational wave is false to begin with.

So what is one to do with LIGO?

If the LIGO tubes were covered with bright-colored fabric, they might serve as a piece of Christo-style art.

SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, SCIENCE FRAUD: Who’s committing it?

October 9, 2013

[Click to enlarge]
Nobel Prize Physics fraud scientific misconduct science fraud NASA Big Bang Cosmology fraud John Mather Nobel Prize John Mather Nobel Laureate John Mather NASA

Nobel Prize Physics fraud scientific misconduct science fraud NASA Big Bang Cosmology fraud John Mather Nobel Prize John Mather Nobel Laureate John Mather NASA
.

[Click to enlarge]
Anil Potti, Dipak Das, Bharat Aggarwal, John Mather, George Smoot, Charles Bennett, Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, Adam Riess, science frauds

Anil Potti, Dipak Das, Bharat Aggarwal, John Mather, George Smoot, Charles Bennett, Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, Adam Riess, science frauds

BIG BANG THEORY STATUS REPORT 2013

September 26, 2013

[Click to enlarge]
John Mather Nobel Prize Laureate NASA Big Bang Cosmology Big Bang Theory 2013

John Mather Nobel Prize Laureate NASA Big Bang Cosmology Big Bang Theory 2013

What is the point of this graphic?

As recently as 26 September 2013, NASA’s John Mather promulgated his fraudulent discovery in a public ticket event:


Nobel Prize Winner John Mather Informs and Entertains at Shaw Lecture

….he discussed a variety of topics including NASA’s Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite …

The COBE measured the spectrum (color) of the heat radiation from the Big Bang …

Either NASA is in complete collusion with their fraudster, or they have no control over him at all. What Mather is doing is not an issue of scientist’s freedom (as in the case of the controversial climate guy); it is an unchecked promulgation of proven fraud by a currently employed government scientist.

(You can see in this video that he is standing 100% behind this discovery.)

It may be that Mather has such backing from the US Congress or the White House that nobody can do anything about it.

And thus is how great science is being shaped today. Thus is how the leaders of universities are inspiring their students today.

And everyone and every group all around seems to be happy with it – except me.

The most frightening thing about the nation to me is that the young of America embrace Mather with open arms, eager to be branded by him. Hamelin comes to mind.

So in the end no one at all is standing with me. But I am very fine with this.

That’s the point of the above graphic. It is a clear statement about the measure of a man.

JOHN MATHER’S NOBEL PRIZE DEFENSE AND TIME MAGAZINE DEFENSE

June 6, 2013

If someone who is not an expert on the nitty-gritty scientific issues involved in the John Mather fraud hears today that there are questions about his long-ago discovery, that someone might reasonably dismiss this out of hand by saying: “But he was given a Nobel Prize for this!”

This is a reasonable position because the Nobel Prize, for the hard sciences especially, comes at the end of a long and elaborate process of examination and vetting by the expert scientific community. In many cases there are subsequent verifications and convincing applications of the discovery. So the underlying assumption is that if there were anything the matter with the discovery, it would have surfaced during this long process. Every stone has been turned. John Mather, for example, made his discovery in 1990 and received his Nobel Prize in 2006. During the intervening period, his discovery was considered to be strenghtened by one new result after another.

So let us examine this Nobel Prize Defense. The right question to ask here is not

“But did he not get the Nobel Prize?”

but

“If something wrong were to emerge with the discovery after it had received the Nobel Prize, what would the Nobel Prize givers say or do?”

The answer: Absolutely nothing. They would remain mum. The reason for this is that the Nobel Prize, by its charter, is absolutely irrevocable. Even if a Laureate himself confesses to have committed science fraud or serial science fraud, he would remain a Nobel Laureate till the ends of time.

Furthermore, the deliberations of the Nobel Prize Committee in awarding the Prize remain secret for a period of 50 years from the year it is awarded. This means that nothing can be known about the process, and nothing can be said about the process today. So the prizegivers cannot say or do anything to indicate anything.

John Mather committed serial science fraud. We know today from the results of two modern satellites, the WMAP and the Planck, that there is hide nor hair of a 3 degrees Kelvin Big Bang Blackbody Spectrum in the sky. Yet in 1975 Mather reported discovering the full spectrum. It was crude, and did not get much attention. In 1990, using the COBE Satellite, he reported the spectrum again, this time with picture-perfect quality. This time he got attention. In due course he got the Nobel Prize.

All of the vetting and all the usual arguments about how the Nobel Prize is the final word failed in the case of Mather. This was a singular case, an exception rather than the rule. But now an exception is trying to hide under the umbrella of the rule.

The bottom line: There can be no Nobel Prize Defense for John Mather. The fact that the Nobel givers do not say anything cannot – by the evidence of their own charter – mean they are defending the discovery.

The fact of the matter is that no genuine discoverer ever needs to invoke the Nobel Prize Defense.

Let me also draw your attention to the repeated public allusions by Mather and his cohort to the facts that he was TIME Magazine’s one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2007, and again one of the 25 most influential people in space in 2012 as supports for his scientific discovery. Can you get any more desperate than this?

PERIMETER DEFENSES FOR NASA SCIENCE FRAUD JOHN MATHER

May 23, 2013

[Click to enlarge]
John Mather Nobel Laureate NASA GSFC science fraud, Smithsonian Associates Future is Here Conference, National Geographic Big Idea, TIME Magazine Most Influential Man in Space, US Congress, James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scientific misconduct, decline and fall of the American civilization

John Mather Nobel Laureate NASA GSFC science fraud, Smithsonian Associates Future is Here Conference, National Geographic Big Idea, TIME Magazine Most Influential Man in Space, US Congress, James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scientific misconduct, decline and fall of the American civilization

REFERENCES:

How powerful Democratic members of the US Congress have repeatedly expressed solidarity with science fraud John Mather

How the James Webb Space Telescope crew have used the platform to promote the individual Mather

How National Geographic feted John Mather (VIDEO)

How TIME Magazine feted John Mather

How the Smithsonian Institution fetes Mather

John C. Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud/scientific misconduct

John C. Mather (left) NASA Nobel Prize Laureate science fraud was never publicly acknowledged in six years since it was exposed. There is no public mention that there was anything the matter with his discovery. His fraud is being handled by various parties concerned by slinking away from his “discovery”. Even as this surreptitious back-pedaling is happening, he is being enabled by people in very high places to whoop it up as a high profile celebrity and a NASA icon, and to inspire young people with his own example.
And now about the luckless ones whose backs no one has.
The frauds of Dr. Anil Potti, Dr. Diapk Das and Dr. Bharat Aggarwal (right, top to bottom) – all Indian-Americans, in unconnected research programs – have all been subjected very promptly and with great urgency to zealous investigation and media reporting, as they should be.
Their careers have pretty much ended.

IN CONCLUSION:

The true intent of the US policy on science fraud/scientific misconduct/scientific integrity clarified

BIG BANG RELIC RADIATION: Then & Now

May 1, 2013

BIG BANG TRENDING – BUT WHICH WAY?

[Click to enlarge]
Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation

Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation

THE BIG BANG THEORY BLACKBODY SPECTRUM:

The success of Big Bang Cosmology rests 100.00% on the discovery of the Cosmic Blackbody Spectrum. This is what the Big Bang Cosmologists themselves have strongly averred. It was with the Blackbody that they shut out all alternative cosmologies and all the critics, and beat up some of them badly.

But there is an attempt today to cite a laundry list of other things that support Big Bang. The idea is to continue Big Bang Cosmology without the Blackbody, now that that scam has been laid bare. Do not fall for this deception. Do not let Big Bang Cosmologists outrun their scam! Do not let these hombres weasel out of this one!

The strangest thing! After plastering the world with the glory of the Big Bang Blackbody all these years, after installing it in museums and in monuments and in children’s textbooks, after garnering all these prizes and accolades and limelight, after conducting such brisk commerce with glossy books and dvds, suddenly everyone has clammed up on it.

The scientific establishment does not ask any questions about this. The scientific media does not ask any questions about this. Why?

Are there parallels between Big Bang Blackbody and Iraqi WMD?

When a science fraud is very fully exposed, what do they do? They simply deep-six the fraudulent discovery. A NATO style secrecy is imposed around it.

Not only that. In concert with the cover up plan, they are relaunching their great hero, science fraud John Mather this summer through a platform as high as the Smithsonian Institutions!

The greatest science fraud in history has been saved by the greatest cover up plan in history – engaged in by a coalition of willing nations.

[Click to enlarge]
Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation
Cover Up of science fraud, scientific misconduct NASA Satellite fraud
Physics Nobel Prize for Physics 1978, 2006, 2011

Planck Satellite, COBE Satellite, WMAP Satellite, John Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate
Big Bang Cosmology Cosmic Relic Radiation, CMB, Big Bang Blackbody Radiation
Cover Up of science fraud, scientific misconduct NASA Satellite fraud
Physics Nobel Prize for Physics 1978, 2006, 2011

Because there has been no official retraction of the Blackbody from any quarters, all the peripheral pundits today are going like energizer bunnies, telling the world in most authoritative language that Big Bang Cosmology has been proved beyond the shadow of a doubt. The truth is that it is the worst kind of chicanery that has ever been perpetrated under the guise of science.

JOHN MATHER SPACE TELESCOPE (JMST)

November 15, 2012

Folks, if you have been following my posts, you will recall that I referred the matter of John Mather science fraud to President Obama on 24 August 2010 after referrals to all levels leading up to him failed to produce any results. John Mather is a Government Scientist with NASA. President Obama is the direct superior of the NASA Administrator. So this was a procedurally correct referral.

I never received any response to that referral. There was some activity in evidence suggesting that Dr. Carl Wieman, an Associate Director of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP), was having some exchanges with Mather following that referral. (Wieman is a fellow Physics Nobel Laureate to John Mather.) On 1 June 2012, Wieman abruptly left that job. (This is the third abrupt high level departure following some dealing of the official concerned with John Mather.) There is no visible indication that anything came out of my referral to President Obama. All indications are that Mather is now soaring even higher.

This was by far the most important issue of returning science to its rightful place on President Obama’s desk – for more than half his first term. He had the noble calling upon him to stand before the world – hat in hand – to say: I am sorry. And then to say: Kids everywhere, I am so sorry that my nation subjected you to this textbook horror. This would have been a poignant image in history: No US President has ever impacted the course of scientific civilization in this way. The President did not do that. Perhaps he was badly advised.

However, I should note that the Government continues to keep John Mather confined to the most humiliating NASA doghouse ( = his pre-Nobel job classification.) So, he has not been officially exonerated by the White House. Officially, his rank remains frozen at the pre-Nobel Prize step. That’s something.

Today an intense revival of John Mather the celebrity is underway. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is being used by NASA scientists as the main platform for this activity, designed to simply fete their colleague out of the science fraud rap. So much so that you might start calling the JWST the John Mather Space Telescope (JMST) for all practical intents and purposes. The JWST twitter and the web page are being used to sing the paeans of “our own John Mather” doing this, doing that, doing the other thing. If Mather sneezes, they report it. If Mather coughs, they report it. If Mather breaks wind, they report it. Recent posts include photo spreads of Mather being interviewed by BBC TV, being anointed by TIME Magazine … etc et al. And watch this video which may be aptly titled “Happy Buddha singing John Mather’s praise.” (About 40 seconds from the start.)

[CLICK TO ENLARGE]
JOHN MATHER BLEW TWO SPACE TELESCOPES:
Billions of taxpayer dollars d–o–w–n the drain!

NASA’s John C. Mather – with his demonstrated unique combination of bungling scientific idiocy and a diabolic capacity for scientific deceit – is respoinsible for blowing two of the major satellite programs.
In an honest and functioning scientific establishment, Mather’s science career should have ended with the failure of the COBE Satellite. He had proved himself incomptetent not once but twice, and that should have been the end of it. Instead, he is today the Space Science Superman.

Earlier, you might recall, JWST was used as the reason for arranging photo shoots of John Mather with powerful congressional leaders. Before that there was a time when the news column on the right of the JWST web page was practically dedicated to John Mather news.

[CLICK TO ENLARGE]
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is all about grooming John Mather

This NASA web page shows how the international public project James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has become all about John Mather.

NASA – before all – knows that Mather committed science fraud. Yet, when an outside outlet like TIME Magazine dishonestly promotes Mather, NASA turns right back around and reports this event with big splash in their Government web pages as though this represented independent scientific affirmation of Mather!

[CLICK TO ENLARGE]
THE JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE (JWST):
Being used for cover up of science fraud

Certain NASA employees have usurped the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) project to use it as a platform to groom NASA science fraud John Mather out of accountability.
The James Webb name is being eclipsed and sullied in the process.

The NASA scientists who are promoting Mather are sitting around figuring out the next move to groom the science fraud in their midst – on your payroll. They have created a whole new value system for science: Media exposure equals scientific recognition and scientific exoneration! And when they find time to do science themselves, they do garbage science – as I have shown you in many earlier posts.

The icon attached to the next generation space telescope is no longer James Webb. He is being upstaged in public perception by John Mather. The Cult of John Mather Worshippers has systematically brought this situation about.

My hopes that the academic scientific establishment is taking over from me the task of dealing with this the greatest science fraud in history have also been shattered. There too, a tremendous John Mather Revival Festival is underway. Even as I write, Clemson University is most irresponsibly exposing its students to Mather’s bold-faced lies, as did Georgia Tech and Tuskegee University. Here is how Clemson is pitching Mather to the public:

Mather travels to universities to explain NASA’s largest project and present his prize-winning research.

So John Mather is taking a roadshow out to the academia and the JWST is being used as a Trojan Horse to sneak in Mather’s fraudulent discovery. Then there is this:

Mather won the Nobel Prize for physics in 2006 by leading a cosmic radiation project that launched a revolutionary space instrument, the Cosmic Background Explorer. This instrument gathered information on high-frequency and radiation patterns traced from the beginning of time.

I suppose, technically, you could call the most expensive piece of space junk “a revolutionary space instrument.”

And here is Clemson’s Physics Chair Mark Leising telling his students stock lies. Any scientific person in the field worth anything knows and understands today that these are no longer true. NASA themselves have officially deep sixed this discovery, as have others. Unretracted lies are not truth – but Leising is passing them off as such.


Clemson University Physics Chair Mark Leising (Clemson photo)

*****

Mark Leising, Clemson’s physics department chairman, said Mather’s work 20 years ago confirmed what scientists had suspected was the case.

“Cosmic microwave background radiation is a kind of echo of the Big Bang,” Leising said. “It’s light that was emitted when the universe was much hotter and denser. Since it has cooled, this light has escaped, moving everywhere at all times.”

Mather was able to measure the light’s energy — which exists at 3 degrees Kelvin above absolute zero — with unprecedented precision, Leising said. Scientists knew the energy should be there, Leising said, and Mather proved it was.

“It put to rest all doubt about the Big Bang,” Leising said.

*****

Clemson is deceiving its students and the public with purposeful deliberation.

And Purdue University is not only feting him, but is making sure to spread the word around to the media. And not to be outdone as a contributor to the John Mather Revival Festival, University of Iowa warmed up some old news from last summer and spinned it as a hot new item: One of their students received “the prestigious” John Mather Nobel Scholarship.

Meanwhile, the school children of the world are being taught fraud science as the scientific ground truth. Their eager minds are being seeded with perverse science. What an auspicious beginning!

Thank you, President Obama!
Thank you, NASA scientists!
Thank you, academics!
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
Not in all my children’s ghost stories have I been able to create such horror for them.

Children of the planet, you are doomed!

They will take years and decades to roll back the scourge of Big Bang Cosmology – in an orchestrated way that saves faces and covers butts. That’s what is important to them. You are not important. You will continue to be fed perverse science to serve their cause.

Nothing more I can do for you. I will pray for you that the European Planck scientists will have the honesty and the decency and the moral courage that the civilization requires of them to end this Great American Deception.

To me it is the civilization’s greatest obscenity that you have to serve as the firewood that produces the light in which a few scamming scientists can do their celebrity dance. This is a terrible price to pay. This is not a sacrifice you should ever have to make – like some latter day Iphigenia. Scientists of you own nations should have been protecting you from this.

[Click to enlarge]
Big Bang Cosmology Nobel Prize Laureates

Big Bang Cosmology Nobel Prize Laureates:
How much more price do the children of the world have to pay to keep these scammers dancing in the limelight?
(i.e. How much longer before the scourge of Big Bang Cosmology is dealt with?)

[Click to enlarge]

To John Mather promoters, protectors, anointers, adorners, handlers, minders, touts, image remakers, cover uppers, regroomers, groupies, worshippers, cult followers, swooners, …
It is written!
I have been saying this for more than five years.
I can say it because it is true and provable.
This is why the NASA Administrator keeps John Mather tied to his doghouse.
This is why you cannot do anything about
that there situation.

THE JOHN C. MATHER NASA SCIENCE FRAUD:
Crystal clear now!

The John C. Mather NASA Nobel Prize Laureate Science Fraud is now crystal clear to the entire world citizenry.

TIME MAGAZINE APPLAUDS SCIENCE FRAUD JOHN MATHER – again!

November 2, 2012


A post in the public interest:
Bad elements within Time Magazine are deceiving the World Citizenry as to John Mather

NASA is glorying that their own John Mather has been chosen by TIME Magazine as one of the 25 Most Influential persons in space science and its future. Earlier, TIME Magazine had given Mather full-page billing as one of the 100 Most Influential People in the World.

How influential is John Mather?

1. John Cromwell Mather – NASA’s first and the only Nobel Laureate – has been kept confined to his pre-Nobel job status by NASA’s leadership since Spring of 2008. In addition to his pre-Nobel assignments, he emphatically has no advisory, visionary or leadership role in NASA. He was given the exalted role of NASA Chief Scientist in the Spring of 2007 in recognition of his Nobel Prize in 2006, but was yanked back to his pre-Nobel job – not too gently – in the Spring of 2008, a year after this author made the allegation of science fraud.

John Mather today is in the same job classification as he was in 1993 (Senior Astrophysicist). He is in the same capacity (Senior Project Scientist) at the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) today as he was in 1995. After sending him back to these positions in the Spring of 2008, NASA has not given any promotions or advancements or decorative titles to this “first civil service Nobel Laureate.” I see his current stewardship of the JWST as simply a result of that 2008 decision, and to not reflect any renewed confidence in him. NASA Leadership may have decided to leave him this fig leaf in 2008.

Who knows Mather better than his own lifelong employer? What justification does the NASA HQ Leadership have on their side to take such drastic steps on America’s space science superhero – a most glittering national treasure? And why does the greatest discoverer of all time stay on in this condition of abject humiliation? Why can’t he convince his own employer that his discovery was legitimate? Why does he instead seek out little outlets like HuffPo to tell the world his discovery was OK? Why can’t Mather’s powerful protectors get NASA HQ Leadership to play along? How can all the outside accolades and feting mask this stench at home? If TIME Magazine has discovered a way to mask BO, they should tell it to Jerry Seinfeld.

These are the facts on the ground about John Mather that the public are not being told by the media represented by TIME Magazine.

2. A recent program HUNTING THE EDGE OF SPACE often aired on PBS has pointedly and surgically removed the Smoot & Mather discovery from the history of cosmology. This stands as a highly public statement on Mather.

3. Judging from Mather’s once-vibrant “Speaking Schedule”, the mainstream academic establishment – much to its credit – has gone cold on him. The incredibly loud feting of Mather today is occurring outside the expert scientific establishment – by people who know nothing about the detailed science and technology involved in the Mather science fraud. This is like a bunch of orangutans dancing around Bernie Madoff within his prison cell, averring that this is a genius human being.

4. Following this author’s referral of the John Mather Science Fraud to President Obama, Mather was summoned to the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy a number of times. The outcome of these meetings is not known – but Mather continues to be confined to his pre-Nobel job status.

5. In the face of the allegation of science fraud, John Mather’s cronies have always tried to keep him afloat and in stark limelight, to engineer his photo-shoots with powerful congressional leaders, etc. It is possible that the former White House Chief of Staff for Science and the former NASA Goddard Center Director both abruptly left their heady and secure Government jobs over some matter to do with their trying to groom Mather out of the charge of science fraud. No explanations for these abrupt high level departures were ever given.

6. This year John Mather had big billing to appear in the Blouin Creative Leadership Summit – a New York do described as the gathering of “movers and shakers and culture makers” of the World. Mather was going to be in the intellectual stratosphere. It appears that he was unceremoniously dropped at the last minute.

7. John Mather reported observing the Cosmic Blackbody Radiation Spectrum with phenomenal precision, using the NASA COBE Satellite. He got his Nobel Prize for this. This was a gigantic science fraud at two levels: First, the instrument he designed was a worthless piece of junk, incapable of making any such measurements. Second, the preliminary findings of the European Space Agency’s Planck Satellite now suggest that that Blackbody Spectrum was never there in the sky to measure. Mather made this out of whole cloth.

8. Thus, John Mather falsified the universe and corrupted the scientific civilization. His undealt fraud subsequently led to more Nobel Prizes for others and thus more corruption. He deceived everybody under the sun. His historical fraud is being compounded each day as he maintains that his discovery is legit – which he has been doing for more than five years now since the allegation was made. Had it not been for this author and this author alone, the civilization would stay forvever corrupted for the posterity. The universe would stay forever falsified.

That’s how influential John Mather is. (Say it like Jay Leno – with drumroll!)

Let’s try again – all together now:

How influential is John Mather?

That’s how influential John Mather is!

Let’s try one more time:

How influential is John Mather?

That’s how influential John Mather is!

And one last time:

How influential is John Mather?

That’s how influential John Mather is!

Finally, here is a groomer of science fraud John Mather:


Richard Stengel, Managing Editor, TIME MAGAZINE
(Creative Commons photo)

Mr. Stengel, take a lesson in leadership excellence and leadership responsibility from the former NASA Administrator Michael Griffin, and from the Obama White House: Fire the butts of those involved in promoting science fraud Mather!

Please make independent inquiries – do not let these people do a snow job on you.

.
.

[Click to read]
THE LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA

Letter to President Obama on John Mather, NASA 2006 Physics Nobel Prize Laureate, science fraud who provided clinching evidence for Big Bang Cosmology with “the greatest discovery of all time.”