Posts Tagged ‘When the nobles scam you’

LIGO NOBEL: A Duty-to-inform message

October 20, 2017


nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nobel fraud, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, nobel committee for physics, nobel committee for physics 2017, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, david reitze ligo, physical review letters, pierre meystre, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, nils martensson, olga botner

nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, nobel fraud, kip thorne, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, kip thorne nobel prize, rainer weiss, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, rainer weiss nobel prize, nobel committee for physics, nobel committee for physics 2017, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, david reitze ligo, physical review letters, pierre meystre, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, nils martensson, olga botner

Advertisements

LIGO FIFTH FRAUD

October 19, 2017


france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board, ligo science collaboration, lsc collaboration, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, rafael l. reif mit, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, royal swedish academy of sciences, laura cadonati ligo, ligo neutron star merger, neutron star merger, binary neutron star, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, pierre meystre, physical review letters

france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board, ligo science collaboration, lsc collaboration, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, thomas f. rosenbaum caltech, rafael l. reif mit, david reitze ligo, david shoemaker ligo, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, royal swedish academy of sciences, laura cadonati ligo, ligo neutron star merger, neutron star merger, binary neutron star, scientific misconduct, science fraud, physics fraud, pierre meystre, physical review letters

LIGO: Neutron Star merger a total scam

October 16, 2017

Folks, there is no question that an astronomical event happened and multiple electromagnetic observatories observed this. There is no question that the role of LIGO in this is a total scam.

What I will do is make this the subject of the courtroom drama series. In the the next post, Attorney Assumpta Veritas will explain everything to you in clear terms. So hang in there!

LIGO COURTROOM DRAMA: Trial Part 8

October 13, 2017

TRIAL PART 8

ON THE WITNESS STAND: Rainer Weiss (for the Defendants)

VINO MOSCATO (Attorney for the Defendants): Professor Weiss, it is an honor to have you here. Congratulations on your Nobel Prize. Now, we know that you do not read stuff Dr. De puts out on the Internet or his book on LIGO. But at my request, you read that book before coming here. What is your reaction?

RAINER WEISS: I believe he cannot understand that LIGO is a novel instrument which cannot be judged by conventional instrumentation concepts.

MOSCATO: So is his entire book dismissible?

WEISS: I believe so.

MOSCATO: Is it correct to conclude that Dr. De is wallowing in his own misunderstandings in his book?

WEISS: I think that’s right.

MOSCATO: Thank you, Professor Weiss. I will not burden you further with this sort of thing. Your witness, Ms. Veritas.

ASSUMPTA VERITAS (Attorney for the Plainfiffs): Good Morning, Professor Weiss. Let’s get right down to it. Does the LIGO instrument have an input signal and an output signal, and if so, what are they? Also, for the ease of understanding, let us use the term wiggle for signal.

WEISS: Yes, there is an input wiggle and there is an output wiggle. The input wiggle would be a time trace of a number that is the linear size of something that is being sequentially contracted and expanded by the passage of a gravitational wave. The output wiggle would be this same wiggle as reported by the LIGO measuring system.

VERITAS: And the two wiggles are different?

WEISS: Yes.

VERITAS: So, is Dr. De correct in describing LIGO as a two-port instrument with an input port and an output port?

WEISS: We don’t look at it this way, but that description is OK up to a point.

VERITAS: And is he correct in saying that the input wiggle and the output wiggle – which are different – are related by an Instrument Transfer Function which must be determined and reported for LIGO to be a valid scientific instrument?

WEISS: This is where his confusion begins. What we do with LIGO is take the output wiggle as reported by LIGO, remove the noise component from it, and what remains is the input wiggle. This process is our equivalent of the conventional Transfer Function. The Instrument Transfer Function procedure is not applicable to LIGO.

VERITAS: Thank you for that clear statement. And the stuff you remove as noise, where does it come from?

WEISS: There are very many sources of noise – seismic ground vibration, a truck passing by, waves lapping on shore, distant thunder, … , And then there are also many types of instrument-origined noise.

VERITAS: When you speak of noise here, anything that is not gravitational wave signal is noise. Is this correct?

WEISS: Yes.

VERITAS: Very good. So, let us make a list of all possible external noise sources and label them A through K, say. Then all instrument-origined noise L through P, say. And let Q be the gravitational wave signal. So when your computer takes out the noise part, does it subdivide the noise into all these categories A through P, and show the tabulated values for the categories?

WEISS: Of course not. Our sophisticated digital technique can distinguish between signal and noise, and remove all that it identifies as noise, namely, A through P taken as a consolidated lump. Only the signal Q then remains, and that is the input wiggle. This is what we compare with the theory wiggle for black hole merger.

VERITAS: But the instrument-origined noise L through P is different from external noise A through K. The latter is not dependent on LIGO, the former is. It is more likely than not that L-P is correlated with Q, the input signal. The “noise” L-P could be harmonics of Q, for example. If your algorithm has instruction to take out out L-P, would not it take out some of Q as well? Or wouldn’t it leave some of L-P with Q? You simply cannot lump together A-K and L-P for the purpose of extracting Q. It may be convenient for the computer, but it is wrong physics.

WEISS: Now we are getting into complicated areas.

VERITAS: Not at all. We have just clarified your misunderstanding. It is the components L through P that necessitate the Instrument Transfer Function, not A through K. You are mixing up and mishandling them, and you are doing so to your benefit. By bypassing the Transfer Function procedure, you have given yourself leeway to make up your custom discovery wiggles from the data. There is nothing about LIGO that cannot be described and analyzed in terms of conventional instrument concept. What is your response to that?

WEISS: As I said, this subject is too complicated.

VERITAS: OK, let’s move on. As Dr. De has pointed out in his book, there is no written evidence anywhere that you have taken into account the Earth’s static magnetic field on the LIGO instrument all these years. What do you have to say about that?

WEISS: This effect is being studied.

VERITAS: So are your discoveries valid even though you left out this effect?

WEISS: This effect cannot be so important as to invalidate our discoveries.

VERITAS: And then Dr. De has also pointed out that you take the hypothetical properties of gravitational wave as true and operative, to deduce the passage of gravitational wave. You assume that the mirror motions are invisibly entangled (because a gravitational wave is passing through) to prove that a gravitational wave has passed through. There is absolutely no experimental evidence of any kind that the mirror motions are in invisible entanglement. This is a pure flight of fancy that leads you to report a tangible discovery.

WEISS: As I said, this is too complicated.

VERITAS: Dr. De has also shown that LIGO is not a complete scientific instrument. I believe the expression he used is “it is not all there.” LIGO cannot detect gravitational waves even if they existed and traversed LIGO. That is because it is the invisible entanglement of the mirrors that LIGO must experimentally demonstrate to report the detection of the wave. And LIGO has no way to do this.

WEISS: We have detected gravitational wave – four times now.

VERITAS: So you say. Professor Weiss, who is wallowing in his own misunderstanding, you or Dr. De? And what about your 1000 colleagues?

MOSCATO: Objection, Your Honor. There is no cause for this kind of taunt.

JUDGE: Overruled. You started this, Mr. Moscato!

VERITAS: Your Honor, I have no further questions.

JUDGE: The witness is excused.

LIGO COURTROOM DRAMA: Trial Part 7

October 13, 2017

TRIAL PART 7

ON THE WITNESS STAND: France Cordova (for the Defendants)

VINO MOSCATO (Attorney for the Defendants): Dr. Cordova, would you please tell the court who you are and what your connection to LIGO is?

FRANCE CORDOVA: I am the Director of National Science Foundation which is an autonomous agency that funds scientific research. The agency has supported LIGO research to detect gravitational wave for decades. Through good times and bad, our support has remained unwavering.

MOSCATO: And what is the total amount NSF has invested in LIGO thus far?

CORDOVA: It is about a billion dollars.

MOSCATO: Was it worth it? If yes, would you tell the court why?

CORDOVA: It was worth every cent we spent. LIGO gave us the greatest scientific discovery ever made. An entire new field of astronmy – called gravitational wave astronomy – has opened up. It gives us a new window on the Universe. We today speak already of multi-messenger astronomy.

MOSCATO: That’s great, Dr. Cordova. And how sure are you that the discovery is solid?

CORDOVA: I am absolutely sure. I have said so repeatedly in public and I have promised our continued support.

MOSCATO: And just to cover all grounds, has your agency’s Inspector General received any complaints about LIGO?

CORDOVA: None that I am aware of. There is no cloud hanging over the LIGO discovery as far as the agency is concerned. It is one of the most vetted scientific results in history.

MOSCATO: Thank you, Dr. Cordova. Your witness, Ms. Veritas.

ASSUMPTA VERITAS (Attorney for the Plainfiffs): Good Afternoon, Dr. Cordova. You have given us a picture of LIGO within your agency that is one hundred percent worry-free and trouble-free. But that’s not quite the case, is it?

CORDOVA: I don’t know what you mean.

VERITAS: Well, your IG may not have received any complaints about LIGO. But did you?

CORDOVA: Well, actually, a referral to the White House about LIGO was forwarded to us. It had some concerns about LIGO.

VERITAS: Do you recall who made that referral?

CORDOVA: I believe it was Dr. De who is sitting here in the courtroom.

VERITAS: And what did you do about those concerns?

CORDOVA: We had actually supported – regardless of that complaint – a study of the role of geomagnetic disturbances on LIGO that was one of Dr. De’s concerns.

VERITAS: OK, just so the jury can follow this issue, geomagnetic disturbances are of earthly origin while gravitational waves come from the far reaches of the Universe. The issue is which one of these LIGO is looking at. Looking at gravitational wave would mean a discovery. Looking at geomagnetic disturbance would mean no discovery. Is this correct?

CORDOVA: Yes, this is correct.

VERITAS: So then, what did that study conclude?

CORDOVA: I believe the study concluded that geomagnetic disturbances could mimic gravitational waves with respect to their simultaneous observation at multiple stations as well as the frequency content of the signal observed. It recommended that every LIGO station have the dedicated means of monitoring geomagnetic disturbances at a high level of accuracy. This monitoring is done with devices called magnetometers.

VERITAS: I will now read portions from the above study: “Going forward, Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo will have low noise magnetometers installed at each observatory site. It will be important to use the magnetometer data to identify coincident magnetic transient events, and veto those times…. Correlated
noise will be a real and legitimate concern for gravitational-wave searches using ground based detectors.”

In view of these findings, why aren’t the past discoveries suspect? If geomagnetic disturbances will be of such crucial importance in future, why were they not an issue in the past? Why aren’t the discoveries thus far suspect?

CORDOVA: We received assurances from the LIGO leaders that their discoveries thus far were shipshape.

VERITAS: Did it not occur to you that such assurances had to be false because no geomagnetic monitoring was available in the cases of the past discoveries?

CORDOVA: We took their word in implicit trust.

VERITAS: So you did not pursue this issue further?

CORDOVA: We had no reason to.

VERITAS: Would it have been within your authority to commission an independent engineering study of the LIGO instrument – independent of the LIGO organization? Such a study could be peformed, for example, by a high-tech consulting company likeThe Aerospace Corporation?

CORDOVA: It would have been within my authority, but that thought never ocurred to me.

VERITAS: Is this a failure of imagination?

CORDOVA: It is not usual for the agency to go outside the scientific establishment and order independent scientific investigations.

VERITAS: So – to summarize – you did receive a complaint about LIGO. You did conduct a study on it. The study gave categorical support to the complaint. But then you closed the matter based of assurances from LIGO and/or from LIGO proponents.

CORDOVA: We attended to the complaint. It had no merit. We moved on.

VERITAS: Who determined that it had no merit?

CORDOVA: The LIGO scientists did.

VERITAS: So you dismissed a complaint that is in scientific evidence as having substance, based on the recommendation of the very project against whom the complaint was made? And all this you did in a secret two-party dealing – NSF and LIGO?

CORDOVA: There is nothing secret about it. The study of geomagnetic disturbances was published.

VERITAS: Exactly where was it published?

CORDOVA: It was published in a special issue of the Journal of Classical and Quantum Gravity.

VERITAS: Is this even a remotely logical place to publish this study on the influence of geomagnetic disturbances on the LIGO instrument? Where do we get gravity here – classical or quantum?

CORDOVA: I cannot say why they decided to publish a paper in a particular journal. We do not micromanage the projects we fund.

VERITAS: Well, it seems to me that for various reasons the paper had to be published, but it was not desirable for it to become widely known. So it was buried in a journal where nobody would look for it.

MOSCATO: Objection, You Honor. Counsel is testifying.

JUDGE: Move on, Ms. Veritas.

VERITAS: Dr. Cordova, was the public informed of this highly significant geomagnetic study in any of the many LIGO public outreach forums where LIGO progress and LIGO developments were constantly being broadcast, bandied about and gloried upon?

CORDOVA: I don’t know the answer to that.

VERITAS: And after that study you still maintain that the discovery is one hundred percent solid?

CORDOVA: I certainly do.

VERITAS: Did it occur to you to inform the Nobel folks of this little-known but highly relevant study you conducted, a study that placed the LIGO discoveries in serious question?

CORDOVA: We do not get involved with the Nobel process.

VERITAS: Are you aware of two other independent studies – one from Japan and one from Russia – suggesting LIGO may have observed just geomagnetic disturbances? These studies were published even as LIGO was undergoing evaluation for the Nobel Prize.

CORDOVA: No. We are not researchers ourselves. We would not know of such studies unless LIGO or others inform us.

VERITAS: And now learning about those studies, you still maintain that the discovery is one hundred percent solid?

CORDOVA: Obviously I cannot answer that without having those studies you mention looked at, and receiving advice.

VERITAS: And who would be doing that looking and advising? LIGO? Would you be satisfied with more assurances from LIGO leaders?

CORDOVA: I suppose a completely independent report could be commissioned from outside the scientific establishment.

VERITAS: It would be a little late, wouldn’t it? The Nobel Prize has already been awarded and it is irrevocable.

CORDOVA: We are not responsible for what the Nobel people do.

VERITAS: I have no further questions for this witness, Your Honor.

JUDGE: The witness may step down.

LIGO COURTROOM DRAMA: Introduction

October 12, 2017


Scientific fraud – especially fraud at the highest, most rarefied levels of physics – cannot be understood by public in general. The best they can do is listen to generalized expert opinions and decide who they can trust. However, it is usually the party at fault which controls what is communicated to the public. This is certainly the case with LIGO.

So I have long wondered how I can effectively explain the LIGO fraud to the butcher, the baker and the candlestick maker. How can the trusting public understand the hanky-panky that goes on in the backrooms of the inviolate temple of learning?

I have watched some courtroom drama on TV. And it has occurred to me that this can be a very effective vehicle to adopt here. The award of the Nobel Prize for this fraud has now prompted me to compose such a drama.

Starting with the next post, I will relate a courtroom drama series on LIGO. This is completely imaginary. Although I will use real names of real people (in public life and/or on public payroll), the statements I will have them making are not statements they ever made. But these statements will be consistent with the public persona they have presented in promoting and installing the LIGO fraud.

Now for the setting:

The LIGO Organization has been sued in the civil court by a taxpayer group that calls themselves The Guardians of Civilization. This group seeks to make LIGO regurgitate the public funds and to have a judge direct their criminal prosecution by the Government for science fraud and taxpayer fraud. Remember the following names:

Assumpta Veritas, Attorney for the Plaintiffs
Vino Moscato, Attorney for the Defendants
Asha Solomon, Judge

THE DIABOLIC CON OF WEISS AND THORNE

October 8, 2017


Of the many expansive scientific lies upon which LIGO is built, perhaps the most effective one for them is that (they say in their website) LIGO is blind to electromagnetic (EM) signals. LIGO senses only mechanical vibrations.

It is in fact EM that LIGO sees most readily. Here is how it works: An EM disturbance is incident on LIGO steel tubes. Since the walls of the tube are thin, this disturbance penetrates through and hits the LIGO innards, in which electric currents are generated. However, there is the Earth’s static magnetic field. Therefore the innards are set in mechanical vibration (following that old motor principle). And such mechanical vibrations are precisely what LIGO is designed to detect.

It seems that the Ligonauts suffer from clinical amnesia about the Earth’s magnetic field, which is THE most crucial factor for their instrument.

Additionally, the km-scale LIGO tubes are especially efficient attractors of geomagnetic disturbances.

Thus, quite unintentionally, LIGO is a fine detector of geomagnetic disturbances, and nothing else.

All this I have explained in this blog within days after the first LIGO detection was announced. They are also in my book.

So you can see that simultaneous observation of a signal at two or three stations does not make a case for gravitational wave. Chirp, ringdown etc – if they are truly present in the data – are related to instrument response upon being actuated by a geomagnetic disturbance. Everything is terrestrial. There is no cause here to invoke extraterrestrial phenomena unless there is some pressing need to come up with grandiose discoveries.

One of the important conclusions that follows is that nothing the Ligonauts say, or explain should be believed. If anyone is interested in assessing anything about LIGO, they have to go completely outside the physics establishment, and ask some group that this establishment cannot “get to.” The establishment can no longer be trusted – not for scientific competence nor for honesty.


nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel prize, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, ligo india, ligo kagra, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board

nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga vetenskapsakademien, kip thorne, kip thorne nobel prize, kip thorne caltech, kip thorne ligo, rainer weiss, rainer weiss nobel prize, rainer weiss mit, rainer weiss ligo, ligo india, ligo kagra, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, national science foundation, national science board

LEMME ‘SPLAIN LIGO TO THE SWEDES….

October 7, 2017


Folks, do you know that even as the LIGO Nobel Prize was announced, there was a very prominent and widely known position within the physics establishment that there was no discovery here? This position was held by some scientists at the University of Copenhagen.

Do you also know that there was a position communicated directly to the Nobel Committee that the LIGO instrument had no valid calibration? A scientific instrument without calibration is like a tape measure without any markings on it.

Both positions are correct, and they together establish without the slightest question that there was no discovery. No way no how.

Do you also know that the Nobel folks have repeatedly expressed the position that they like to wait many years after a discovery is reported to be sure that it can stand the test of time?

So why was this prize given in an unseemly hurry under these clear circumstances? And why isn’t anybody raising any issues about this most bizarre award in the entire history of the Nobel Prize?

The LIGO Nobel Prize was rammed through with total disregard for science or society or even the Nobel tradition. It is a dirty power play on the part of some very ugly people hellbent on prevailing against any dissent of any kind. They have some agenda and some timetable, and no one is going to stand in their way.They are not going to wait for anyone or anything.

But, lighten up. May be I can use a little humor to explain to the Swedes for once what it is that they have just anointed.



nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, kip thorne, rainer weiss

nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, ligo hanford, ligo livingston, ligo virgo, ligo kagra, ligo india, france cordova nsf, kip thorne, rainer weiss

BILLION-DOLLAR BULLSHIT AWARDED NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS 2017

October 6, 2017

The following conclusions are from my book. Conclusions 1 – 11 are in the book, and Conclusion 12 has been added for clarity.

The first edition of the book was published in August 2016, and was available the whole time the Nobel Prize deliberations were taking place.

THE NOBEL FIRMAMENT

October 5, 2017


nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga Vetenskapsakademien, ligo collaboration, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, john mather nobel prize, rainer weiss nobel prize, saul perlmutter nobel prize, national science foundation, national science board, pontifical academy of sciences

nobel prize, nobel prize 2017, nobel prize physics, nobel prize physics 2017, nobel foundation, royal swedish academy of sciences, kungliga Vetenskapsakademien, ligo collaboration, lsc collaboration, france cordova nsf, nsf ligo, john mather nobel prize, rainer weiss nobel prize, saul perlmutter nobel prize, national science foundation, national science board, pontifical academy of sciences